PO.BCS01.03 · 生物信息与计算

对HBV、HCV及非病毒相关HCC的多组学解析揭示不同的增殖、干扰素和代谢特征

Multiomic dissection of HBV-, HCV-, and non-viral HCC reveals distinct proliferation, interferon, and metabolic signatures

海报缩略图:对HBV、HCV及非病毒相关HCC的多组学解析揭示不同的增殖、干扰素和代谢特征
编号 2682 展板 7 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 1 主讲 AMERTI GUTA, BA
分会场 Application of Bioinformatics to Cancer Biology 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Amerti Guta1, Daniel O'Brien2, Aditya V. Bhagwate3, Jean-Pierre A. Kocher3, Lewis R. Roberts4

1Clinical and Translational Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,3Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,4Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的原发性肝癌,通过多种途径发展;然而,HBV、HCV和非病毒病因在多大程度上塑造肿瘤生物学并影响治疗反应仍未得到充分理解。从测序数据中检测病毒的方法以及多组学工作流程的可用性,为研究病因如何影响HCC的分子图景提供了新的机遇。在此,我们分析TCGA的LIHC样本,将其分类为HBV、HCV和非病毒肿瘤,以比较这些HCC肿瘤的基因组、转录组和甲基化谱,从而识别各组特有的生物学通路。 方法:分析了来自TCGA-LIHC(n=325)的全外显子组、RNA-seq和临床数据。使用Exogene(≥5条HBV/HCV读段;排除混合感染;非病毒=0读段)分配病毒状态。使用cBioPortal进行突变和临床比较。RNA-seq数据使用edgeR进行三向差异表达处理(中位计数≥25;|log₂FC|>2;FDR<0.05)。通路富集使用ShinyGO。使用以limma分析的GSE62232微阵列队列验证发现。 结果:人口统计学模式反映了已知的风险特征:HBV患者发病较年轻(平均53.9岁),以男性(78.8%)和亚洲人(92.9%)为主,而HCV和非病毒组年龄较大,以白人为主。非病毒HCC女性比例最高(42.7%),近半数缺乏显著纤维化,与代谢性疾病相符。相比之下,HCV的肝硬化负荷最高(47.2%),HBV肿瘤的低分化组织学比例最大(52.2%)。三种肿瘤亚型间表达基因的比较揭示了不同的病因相关通路。代谢和线粒体相关(包括脂肪酸β氧化)在非病毒HCC中差异表达。在HCV-HCC中观察到抗病毒和干扰素信号的激活,包括I型IFN反应和OAS介导的防御通路。最后,细胞周期和增殖通路在HBV阳性肿瘤中差异表达,这一发现与病毒整合的效应相一致。聚类分析将HBV和非病毒肿瘤分为不同的组。这些特征在验证队列中得到重现。 结论:我们的分析强调,HBV、HCV和非病毒HCC具有不同的转录和信号通路。这些病因特异性特征为开发更精确的生物标志物以及根据各病因的分子生物学定制治疗策略提供了框架。 致谢:我们感谢已故的Sean Cleary医学博士对本项目的宝贵贡献。声明:已使用AI精简语句以符合字数限制。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver cancer, develops through multiple pathways; however, the extent to which HBV, HCV, and non-viral etiologies shape tumor biology and influence treatment responses remain incompletely understood. The availability of viral detection methods from sequencing data and multiomics workflows give us a new opportunities to study how etiology influences the molecular landscape of HCC. Here, we analyze TCGA's LIHC samples categorized into HBV-, HCV-, and non-viral tumors to compare genomic, transcriptomic and methylation profile of these HCC tumors to identify biological pathways specific to each group. Methods: Whole-exome, RNA-seq, and clinical data from TCGA-LIHC (n=325) were analyzed. Viral status was assigned using Exogene (≥5 HBV/HCV reads; mixed infections excluded; non-viral = 0 reads). Mutation and clinical comparisons were performed using cBioPortal. RNA-seq data were processed with edgeR for 3-way differential expression (median count ≥25; |log₂FC|>2; FDR<0.05). Pathway enrichment used ShinyGO. Findings were validated using the GSE62232 microarray cohort analyzed with limma. Results: Demographic patterns reflected known risk profiles: HBV patients presented younger (mean 53.9 years) and were predominantly male (78.8%) and Asian (92.9%), while HCV and non-viral groups were older and primarily White. Non-viral HCC showed the highest proportion of females (42.7%) and nearly half lacked significant fibrosis, consistent with metabolic disease. In contrast, HCV had the highest cirrhosis burden (47.2%), and HBV tumors showed the greatest proportion of poorly differentiated histology (52.2%).The comparison of the expressed genes between the 3 tumor subtypes revealed distinct etiology-associated pathways. Metabolic and mitochondrial including fatty acid beta-oxidation differential expressed in Non-viral HCC. Activation of antiviral and interferon signaling, including type I IFN response and OAS-mediated defense pathways are observed in HCV-HCC. Finally, Cell-cycle and proliferation pathways are differentially expressed in HBV-positive, a finding consistent with effects of viral integration. Clustering analysis separated HBV and non-viral tumors into distinct groups. These signatures were reproduced in a validation cohort. Conclusion: Our analyses highlight that HBV-, HCV-, and non-viral HCC harbor distinct transcriptional and signaling pathways. These etiology-specific signatures provide a framework for developing more precise biomarkers and for tailoring therapeutic strategies to the molecular biology of each etiology. Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the late Dr. Sean Cleary, MD, for his invaluable contributions to this project. Disclosure: AI has been used to trim sentences in order to fit in the word limit.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Guta, None.. D. O'Brien, None.. A. V. Bhagwate, None.. J. A. Kocher, None.. L. R. Roberts, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索