PO.BCS01.03 · 生物信息与计算

对患者和临床前数据的多组学分析凸显了在胶质母细胞瘤中靶向肿瘤异质性的挑战

Multi-omic analysis of patient and preclinical data highlights challenges in targeting tumor heterogeneity in glioblastoma

海报缩略图:对患者和临床前数据的多组学分析凸显了在胶质母细胞瘤中靶向肿瘤异质性的挑战
编号 2683 展板 8 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 1 主讲 Ha Dang, PhD
分会场 Application of Bioinformatics to Cancer Biology 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ha Dang, Verah Nyarige, Gonzalo Lopez, Ann Forslund, Wei Zhang, Bo Hu, Junfei Zhao, Maria Ortiz-Estevez, Alexandre Alloy, Romain Georges, Elizabeth Tindall, Josh Baughman, Kai Wang, Jorge Benitez-Hernandez, Celia Fontanillo

Bristol Myers Squibb, San Diego, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是成人中最具侵袭性和致死性的原发性脑肿瘤,其特征是广泛的肿瘤异质性和细胞可塑性。已报道存在多种紧密嵌入神经和胶质发育程序中的肿瘤细胞状态。响应微环境因素和治疗压力的状态转变对有效治疗构成重大障碍。因此,理解GBM异质性及驱动其的机制对于开发持久疗法至关重要。我们运用整合分析策略,利用大型患者队列中的bulk和单细胞数据,深入表征GBM肿瘤亚型和细胞状态,并识别既能将肿瘤细胞与正常神经-胶质谱系区分开、又在各肿瘤状态中保持组成性激活的可靶向基因。我们的分析识别出约400个多状态基因,它们在多种肿瘤亚型和细胞状态中具有一致的活性,并与正常谱系相区别。有趣的是,尽管EGFR和VEGFA等经典靶点已被广泛研究,却缺乏在所有肿瘤状态中的一致激活。EGFR在NPC样状态中活性较低,而VEGFA仅限于缺氧相关的间充质程序。同样,MDM2在各肿瘤状态中显示激活,但在正常谱系中也广泛表达,限制了其治疗特异性。这些提示这些常见靶点可能无法应对肿瘤异质性的完整谱系,也无法与正常谱系相区别,这很可能是近期临床试验面临挑战的原因之一。进一步分析揭示了多状态基因中细胞周期活动和DNA损伤反应的富集,提示它们是GBM肿瘤与成熟正常脑细胞之间的关键区别因素。此外,多组学分析显示DNA甲基化是多状态基因沉默的主要机制,在某些情况下导致正常细胞中基因完全关闭。最后,与DepMap CRISPR活力筛选数据的整合揭示了一部分基因在各亚型的GBM细胞系和神经球模型中具有强烈依赖性,与患者数据相一致。然而,这些基因中的大多数在泛谱系中也表现出依赖性,凸显了靶向多状态基因时诸如外周毒性等潜在挑战。总之,我们的研究识别出细胞周期调控仍是GBM的一个区别特征,并凸显了区分和靶向肿瘤异质性的复杂性。克服这些挑战可能需要能够选择性靶向多种肿瘤状态的创新治疗手段。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by extensive tumor heterogeneity and cellular plasticity. A wide range of tumor cell states have been reported that are tightly embedded within neural and glial developmental programs. State transition in response to microenvironmental factors and therapeutic pressures poses a major obstacle to effective treatment. Therefore, understanding GBM heterogeneity and the mechanisms driving it is essential for developing durable therapies. We applied integrative analytical strategies leveraging bulk and single-cell data across large patient cohorts to deeply characterize GBM tumor subtypes and cell states and identify targetable genes that both distinguish tumor cells from normal neuro-glial lineages and remain constitutively activated across tumor states. Our analysis identified ~400 multi-state genes with consistent activity in multiple tumor subtypes and cell states and differentiation from the normal lineages. Interestingly, canonical targets such as EGFR and VEGFA , while widely studied, lacked consistent activation across all tumor states. EGFR was less active in NPC-like state and VEGFA was restricted to hypoxia-associated mesenchymal programs. Similarly, MDM2 showed activation across tumor states but was also broadly expressed in normal lineages, limiting its therapeutic specificity. These suggest these common targets may not address the full spectrum of tumor heterogeneity or differentiate from normal lineages, likely contributing to the challenges in recent clinical trials. Further analysis revealed the enrichment of cell cycle activities and DNA damage responses among multi-state genes suggesting they are the key differentiating factors between GBM tumor and matured normal brain cells. In addition, multi-omic profiling showed that DNA methylation was a major mechanism of gene silencing for multi-state genes and in some cases resulted in complete gene shutdown in normal cells. Finally, integration with DepMap CRISPR viability screen data revealed a subset of genes with strong dependencies in GBM cell lines and neurosphere models across subtypes, consistent with patient data. However, most of these genes also demonstrated dependency across pan lineages, highlighting potential challenges such as peripheral toxicity when targeting multi-state genes. In summary, our study identified cell cycle regulation remains a distinguishing feature of GBM and highlighted the complexity of differentiating and targeting tumor heterogeneity. Overcoming these challenges may require innovative therapeutic modalities capable of selectively targeting multiple tumor states.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Dang, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. V. Nyarige, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. G. Lopez, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. A. Forslund, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. W. Zhang, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. B. Hu, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. J. Zhao, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. M. Ortiz-Estevez, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. A. Alloy, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. R. Georges, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. E. Tindall, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. J. Baughman, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. K. Wang, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. J. Benitez-Hernandez, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock. C. Fontanillo, Bristol Myers Squibb Employment, Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索