PO.CL01.07 · 临床研究
使用一种新型超灵敏全基因组测序ctDNA检测法检测结直肠癌术后微小残留病灶
Detection of postoperative minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer using a novel ultrasensitive whole-genome sequencing-based ctDNA test
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:
在根治性手术后准确检测微小残留病灶(MRD)仍是结直肠癌(CRC)管理中的一大局限。当前的ctDNA检测仅能识别30-50%后来发生临床复发的患者,限制了其在辅助治疗升级和安全降级方面的效用。我们评估了一种新型、超灵敏、肿瘤指导的、基于全基因组测序(WGS)的ctDNA检测法,该检测法经过设计以最大化检测灵敏度,同时通过消除对定制患者特异性捕获panel的需求、缩短周转时间、仅需1mL血浆来简化临床实施。
方法:
收集了300例II-III期CRC患者(中位随访35.7个月)的术前和术后血浆样本(术后第14天和第30天采集)。在摘要提交时,已分析161例患者,但完整队列结果(n=300)将在AACR 2026上呈现。该检测法(AccuScan)利用滚环扩增将单链cfDNA转化为串联体,在适度测序深度(中位28×)下实现>1000倍的错误抑制。肿瘤指导的变异追踪源自配对的肿瘤/胚系WGS。ctDNA检测在对临床信息设盲的情况下进行。性能根据复发结局进行评估。
结果:
在161例分析患者中,43例(26.7%)复发。每位患者追踪的肿瘤来源变异中位数为11,822个,平均错误率为4.97×10⁻⁷。术前,该新型WGS检测法在98.1%的样本中检测到ctDNA。术后,在69.8%的复发患者中至少一份样本(第14天或第30天)检测到ctDNA,特异性为91.5%。第14天的灵敏度和特异性分别为55.8%和96.6%,第30天分别为62.8%和94.1%。复发患者的ctDNA水平低至2.7 ppm(中位162 ppm)。将该性能外推至未经选择的III期人群,表明术后ctDNA阴性个体的3年复发率约为10%,与低危II期疾病相当,而后者通常不建议进行辅助治疗。术后ctDNA状态是无复发生存的有力预测因素(HR 11.9;95% CI,6.2-23.1;p<0.001)。在头对头比较中,使用8mL血浆等分试样的肿瘤指导数字PCR在术前(75.4%)和术后(第14天33.3%;第30天51.5%)均实现了显著较低的灵敏度。
结论:
这种新型基于WGS的检测法在术前和术后环境中均提供了卓越的灵敏度,同时仅需极少量血浆。这一简化的工作流程与真实世界临床实施兼容。第14天的灵敏检测为更早的治疗干预提供了机会,且该检测法的性能支持其在未来的治疗降级试验中应用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction:
Accurate detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative intent surgery remains a major limitation in colorectal cancer (CRC) management. Current ctDNA assays identify only 30-50% of patients who later develop clinical recurrence, restricting their utility for both escalation and safe de-escalation of adjuvant therapy. We evaluated a novel, ultrasensitive, tumor-informed, whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based ctDNA test engineered to maximize detection sensitivity while simplifying clinical implementation by eliminating the need for bespoke patient-specific capture panels, reducing turnaround time, and requiring only 1mL of plasma.
Methods:
Pre- and postoperative plasma samples (drawn 14 and 30 days after operation) from 300 stage II-III CRC patients (median follow-up 35.7 months) were collected. At the time of abstract submission, 161 patients have been analyzed, but complete cohort results (n = 300) will be presented at AACR 2026. The test ( AccuScan ) utilizes rolling-circle amplification to convert single-stranded cfDNA into concatemers, enabling >1000-fold error suppression at modest sequencing depth (median 28×). Tumor-informed variant tracking was derived from paired tumor/germline WGS. ctDNA detection was done blinded to clinical information. Performance was evaluated against recurrence outcomes.
Results:
Among the 161 analyzed patients, 43 (26.7%) recurred. A median of 11,822 tumor-derived variants per patient were tracked with a mean error rate of 4.97 × 10⁻⁷. Preoperatively, the novel WGS test detected ctDNA in 98.1% of samples. Postoperatively, ctDNA was detected in at least one sample (day 14 or 30) in 69.8% of recurrence patients with a specificity of 91.5%. Sensitivity and specificity were 55.8% and 96.6% at day 14 and 62.8% and 94.1% at day 30. ctDNA levels in recurrence patients reached as low as 2.7 ppm (median 162 ppm). Extrapolating the performance to an unselected stage III population indicates a ~10% 3-year recurrence rate for postoperative ctDNA-negative individuals, comparable to low-risk stage II disease, for which adjuvant therapy is generally not recommended. Postoperative ctDNA status was a strong predictor of recurrence-free survival (HR 11.9; 95% CI, 6.2-23.1; p<0.001). In a head-to-head comparison, tumor-informed digital PCR using 8mL plasma aliquots achieved substantially lower sensitivity both preoperative (75.4%) and postoperative (33.3% day 14; 51.5% day 30).
Conclusion:
The novel WGS-based test delivers exceptional sensitivity in both preoperative and postoperative settings while requiring minimal plasma. The streamlined workflow is compatible with real-world clinical implementation. Sensitive detection at day 14 offers an opportunity for earlier therapeutic intervention, and the assay's performance supports its use in future therapy de-escalation trials.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Hønholt, None..
T. V. Henriksen, None..
M. H. Rasmussen, None..
C. Demuth, None..
T. Kolbro, None..
P. Bondeven, None..
J. Kildsig, None..
P. V. Andersen, None..
A. Tøttrup, None..
N. H. Schlesinger, None..
C. Jaensch, None..
O. Thorlacius-Ussing, None..
C. Peter, None..
A. Monti, None.
Y. Wang,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
T. Berntsen,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
G. Yeung,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
P. Tang,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
T. Wittkop,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
M. Faham,
AccuraGen, Inc. Independent Contractor.
Illumina Venture Employment.
L. Weng,
AccuraGen, Inc. Employment.
L. H. Iversen, None..
K. A. Gotschalck, None.
C. L. Andersen,
Astra Zeneca ).
Foresight Diagnostics ).
Labcorp ).
Personalis ).
DOMORE Diagnostics ).