PO.CL01.04 · 临床研究

Early-onset low-grade adverse events as predictive biomarkers in advanced NSCL: A multi-treatment cohort analysis

海报缩略图:Early-onset low-grade adverse events as predictive biomarkers in advanced NSCL: A multi-treatment cohort analysis
编号 3734 展板 6 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 41 主讲 Dung-Tsa Chen, PhD
分会场 Biomarkers Predictive of Therapeutic Benefit 4
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Dung-Tsa Chen1, Andreas N. Saltos1, Zachary Thompson1, Junmin Whiting1, Sebastian Viracacha1, Timothy I. Shaw1, Ignacio I. Wistuba2, Jhanelle E. Gray1

1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,2UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

摘要 Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess whether early-onset, grade 1 (G1) and low-grade (LG) treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs) can serve as predictive markers for favorable survival outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across different treatment modalities. Methods: We analyzed data from 577 NSCLC patients across 11 cohorts treated at Moffitt Cancer Center: 5 immunotherapies (n=383), 3 targeted therapies (n=88), and 3 chemotherapies (n=106). Data for analysis used AE data derived from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4-5), treatment response including comparison of responder (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)) versus non-responder (stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD)) and comparison of disease control (DC: CR/PR/SD) versus PD using Wilcoxon two-sample test, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival curve with log-rank test. Our analytic approach leveraged multiple AE parameters to develop a set of innovative AE biomarkers. Early-onset G1/LG TrAEs were defined as those occurring within 30 days of treatment initiation. Results: Early-onset AE analysis across all treatment types revealed that (a) Immunotherapy had lower frequency of G1 and LG TrAEs compared to chemotherapy and targeted therapy; (b) higher frequency of G1 and LG TrAEs were associated with better treatment response in immunotherapy (responder vs non-responder with p=0.047 (G1) and 0.069 (LG); DC vs PD with p=0.005 (G1) and 0.018 (LG)), but no significant results in chemotherapy and targeted therapy; (c) For patients who did not encounter HG non-treatment related AEs (non-TrAEs), if they frequently experienced G1 and LG TrAEs, their survival outcomes tended to be better compared to the ones with less or no AE experiences in immunotherapy (median PFS: 5.5 vs 3.5 months with p=0.03 for G1 and 5.5 vs 3.3 months with p=0.015 for LG; median OS: 18.2 vs 12.2 months with p=0.008 for G1 and 16.1 vs 12.2 months with p=0.04 for LG). Please note that non-TrAEs represent a strong surrogate for compromised baseline health status. Without proper adjustment, this factor may confound the observed association between early-onset G1 and LG TrAEs and survival outcomes. For in chemotherapy and targeted therapy, both G1 and LG TrAEs did not show significant survival association. Conclusion: G1 and LG TrAEs within 30 days of therapy initiation were associated with better treatment response and improved survival in advanced NSCLC, especially in immunotherapy-treated patients. These findings support the use of early-onset G1/LG TrAE profiles as potential predictive biomarkers.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Chen, None.. Z. Thompson, None.. J. Whiting, None.. S. Viracacha, None.

在会议检索中打开