PO.CL01.04 · 临床研究
利用单核多组学揭示与局部晚期疾病相关的透明细胞肾细胞癌异质性
Unveiling clear cell renal cell carcinoma heterogeneity associated with locally advanced disease using single nucleus multi-omics
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)是最常见的肾癌类型,其临床病程多样,由分子和组织学异质性驱动。随着辅助治疗(包括免疫治疗和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI))的引入,ccRCC患者的总生存显著改善,尤其是对于肾切除术后复发风险较高的患者。然而,对于那些复发者,这些靶向治疗的反应率差异很大。为破解与晚期ccRCC相关的治疗反应性的分子基础,我们对8例患者肾切除术后采集的新鲜肿瘤样本进行了基因表达和染色质动力学的单核分析。
在比较3期(n=6)和1期(n=2)患者之间不同的ccRCC亚群时,我们观察到大范围的全局转录差异,其中一部分代谢活跃、EDIL3表达升高的RCC细胞发生富集。除了该RCC亚群在3期患者中分布增加外,我们还在这些细胞中鉴定出与4个ccRCC风险增加的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)命中位点重叠的染色体区域(Purdue等,2024)。在本队列所发现的ccRCC亚群集群中,EDIL3-ccRCC的基因特征在I-III期TCGA-KIRC(n=372)中与较短的生存时间显著相关(OR=4.65;P=1.9E4)。有趣的是,这些细胞以及一个FOS表达的ccRCC集群,在我们队列中最终复发的患者中同样富集。结合与其他肿瘤细胞相比ERK和RAS信号的上调,EDIL3-ccRCC中脂肪酸代谢的增加可能代表一种替代信号机制,可通过转移和疾病复发促进进展。药物反应性的计算机模拟预测显示,EDIL3-ccRCC对多种EGFR抑制剂的治疗敏感性总体下降。相反,虽然FOS-ccRCC特征似乎也与疾病复发相关,但这些细胞对多种TKI尤其是舒尼替尼高度敏感。这些结果提示可利用ccRCC亚群的差异性治疗易感性,从而在临床中提供更佳的联合治疗。
为改进辅助治疗设计的概念框架,我们的研究深入刻画了与更高分期和疾病进展相关的ccRCC亚群,其可能通过不同的可成药致癌通路发挥作用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer with diverse clinical courses that are driven by molecular and histological heterogeneity. Overall survival of ccRCC patients has improved significantly with the introduction of adjuvant therapies, including immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), particularly for patients at higher risk of recurrence post-nephrectomy. However, the response rate to these targeted therapies for those that relapse can vary greatly. To decipher the molecular underpinning of therapy responsiveness associated with advanced stage ccRCC, we performed single nucleus analysis of gene expression and chromatin dynamics on fresh post-nephrectomy tumor samples collected in 8 patients.
Upon comparing different ccRCC subpopulations between stage 3 (n=6) and stage 1 (n=2) patients, we observed large global transcriptional differences with an enrichment of a subset of metabolically active RCC cells with heightened EDIL3 expression. Besides the increased distribution of this RCC subset in stage 3 patients, we have identified chromosomal regions in these cells that overlapped with 4 genome-wide association study (GWAS) hits for increased risk of ccRCC (Purdue et al., 2024). Among the clusters of ccRCC subsets discovered in this cohort, the gene signatures of EDIL3 -ccRCC are significantly associated with lower survival time (OR= 4.65; P=1.9E4) in stage I-III TCGA-KIRC (n = 372). Intriguingly, these cells, as well as a FOS expressing ccRCC cluster, are also enriched in patients in our cohort that eventually relapsed. Together with the upregulation of ERK and RAS signaling compared to other tumor cells, the increased fatty acid metabolism in EDIL3 -ccRCC may present an alternative signaling mechanism that can contribute to progression due to metastasis and disease recurrence. In silico prediction of drug responsiveness revealed an overall decrease of therapeutic sensitivity of EDIL3 -ccRCC toward various EGFR inhibitors. In contrast, while FOS -ccRCC signature also appears to be associated with disease recurrence, these cells are highly sensitive to various TKI and Sunitinib in particular. These results suggest the potential to leverage the differential therapeutic vulnerability of ccRCC subpopulations to provide better combination therapies in the clinic.
With the goal of improving the conceptual framework for the design of adjuvant therapies, our study offers an in-depth characterization of ccRCC subpopulations that are associated with higher stages and disease progression, possibly through different druggable oncogenic pathways.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. Shah, None..
A. Ng, None..
J. Wang, None..
H. Khalili, None..
T. Pham, None..
M. Neumann, None..
X. Zhu, None..
A. Lee, None.