PO.CL01.07 · 临床研究

一种针对新兴生物标志物的新型检测策略:利用循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测MTAP缺失

A novel detection strategy for an emerging biomarker: MTAP loss detection with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)

海报缩略图:一种针对新兴生物标志物的新型检测策略:利用循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测MTAP缺失
编号 1131 展板 12 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 44 主讲 Shirish Gadgeel, MD
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Lauren S. Welch1, Radhika Gutta2, Fawzi Abu Rous2, Bindu R. Potugari2, Sudha Sadasivan2, Shirish M. Gadgeel2

1Guardant Health, Inc, Palo Alto, CA,2Henry Ford Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:甲硫腺苷磷酸化酶(MTAP)是一种在癌症中频繁缺失的抑癌基因,最常通过9p21位点(MTAP、CDKN2A、CDKN2B)的缺失而丢失。MTAP缺失是一种新兴生物标志物,具有在研疗法,但其检测一直依赖组织分析,在晚期(adv)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的患病率估计为10-18%。通过ctDNA检测大片段基因缺失在技术上较为困难,且大多数商业化ctDNA检测组合并不报告MTAP缺失。鉴于液体活检的便捷性及扩大试验入组资格的潜力,我们使用一种商业化ctDNA检测分析了肺癌中MTAP缺失的患病率和基因组格局。 方法:从Guardant Health数据库中识别出2024年7月至2025年6月期间接受Guardant360®液体检测的晚期肺癌患者(pts)。起始日期与该检测的扩展(>740个基因/表观基因组学)及纳入MTAP缺失报告相一致。MTAP缺失定义为通过纯合缺失(HomDel)导致的双等位基因缺失,或伴有共存功能丧失变异的单拷贝缺失(del);按组织学类型和肿瘤分数(TF)评估患病率及共存改变(co-alt)。共存改变比较采用双侧Fisher精确检验(p<0.05为显著)。 结果:在所有肺癌患者中,MTAP缺失的检出率为1.9%(330/17,333),鳞状细胞癌为2.1%(55/2591),非鳞状细胞癌(nsq)为1.8%(244/13,745),与TF无关;其中94%(310/330)为NSCLC。中位(m)年龄为69岁;54.2%为男性。对于晚期NSCLC,患病率随TF升高而增加,在TF>10%的患者中达到10.9%(294/2706),与基于组织的检出率一致。在非鳞状NSCLC中,频繁共存改变的基因包括CDKN2A(96%)、TP53(73%)、EGFR(43%)、KRAS(28%)、KEAP1(27%)、STK11(26%)、RB1(25%)和CCNE1(24%)。与无MTAP缺失的非鳞状NSCLC相比,CDKN2A(多为HomDel)、CCNE1、EGFR、BRCA2、KEAP1、STK11、RB1和FGFR1呈富集(p<1×10⁻¹⁰)。MTAP缺失队列中的mTF和bTMB更高(30.9% vs 0.7%;15.1 vs 12.5 mut/Mb)。致癌性EGFR突变(muts)发生率为16.4%(54/330),包括外显子19缺失(46%)、L858R(23%)、外显子20插入(11%)及其他突变(20%);mTF为28.1%(范围7.7-90%)。致癌性KRAS突变存在于19.1%(63/330),最常见为G12X(70%),mTF为26.3%(范围1.6-80.7%)。在EGFR和KRAS突变型NSCLC中,MTAP缺失的总体患病率分别为2.3%(54/2304)和2.0%(63/3172)。 结论:这项首次针对NSCLC中MTAP缺失患病率及共突变格局的ctDNA分析表明,当TF充足时,MTAP缺失可通过ctDNA在各组织学类型中被检出,为组织不可获得或需要快速结果时提供了一种实用替代方案。对于低脱落病例,ctDNA检测MTAP缺失可通过甲基化方法进一步增强。更广泛地使用ctDNA检测可扩大MTAP缺失的检出,增加临床试验入组资格及获取新疗法的机会。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase ( MTAP ) is a tumor suppressor gene frequently deleted in cancer, most often through loss of the 9p21 locus ( MTAP , CDKN2A , CDKN2B ). MTAP loss is an emerging biomarker with investigational therapies, yet detection has relied on tissue analysis, with prevalence estimates of 10-18% in advanced (adv) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Detection of large gene deletions by ctDNA is technically difficult and MTAP loss is not reported on most commercial ctDNA panels. Given the convenience of liquid biopsy and potential to expand trial eligibility, we analyzed the prevalence and genomic landscape of MTAP loss in lung cancer using a commercial ctDNA assay. Methods: Patients (pts) with adv lung cancer who had Guardant360® Liquid testing between 7/2024-6/2025 were identified from the Guardant Health database. The start date aligned with assay expansion (>740 genes/epigenomics) and inclusion of MTAP loss reporting. MTAP loss was defined as bi-allelic loss by homozygous deletion (HomDel) or single copy deletion (del) with a co-occurring loss of function variant; prevalence and co-alterations (co-alt) were assessed by histology and tumor fraction (TF). Co-alt comparisons used two-sided Fisher's Exact Test (p<0.05 significant). Results: MTAP loss was detected in 1.9% (330/17,333) of all lung cancer pts, 2.1% (55/2591) squamous, and 1.8% (244/13,745) non-squamous (nsq), regardless of TF; 94% (310/330) were NSCLC. Median (m) age was 69; 54.2% were male. For adv NSCLC, prevalence increased with TF, reaching 10.9% (294/2706) in pts with TF > 10%, consistent with tissue-based rates. In nsqNSCLC, frequently co-altered genes included CDKN2A (96%), TP53 (73%), EGFR (43%), KRAS (28%), KEAP1 (27%), STK11 (26%), RB1 (25%), and CCNE1 (24%). Compared to nsqNSCLC without MTAP loss, CDKN2A ( mostly HomDel), CCNE1 , EGFR , BRCA2 , KEAP1 , STK11 , RB1 , and FGFR1 were enriched (p<1×10⁻10). mTF and bTMB were higher in the MTAP loss cohort (30.9% vs 0.7%; 15.1 vs 12.5 mut/Mb). Oncogenic EGFR mutations (muts) occurred in 16.4% (54/330), including exon 19 del (46%), L858R (23%), exon 20 insertion (11%), and other muts (20%); mTF was 28.1% (range 7.7-90%). Oncogenic KRAS muts were present in 19.1% (63/330), most commonly G12X (70%), with mTF of 26.3% (range 1.6-80.7%). Overall prevalence of MTAP loss in EGFR and KRAS mutated NSCLC was 2.3% (54/2304) and 2.0% (63/3172), respectively. Conclusion: This first ctDNA analysis of MTAP loss prevalence and co-mutational landscape in NSCLC demonstrates that MTAP loss can be detected by ctDNA across histologies when TF is sufficient, offering a practical alternative when tissue is unavailable or rapid results are needed. ctDNA detection of MTAP loss may be further enhanced by methylation approaches for low-shed cases. Broader use of ctDNA testing could expand MTAP loss detection, increasing clinical trial eligibility and access to new therapies.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. S. Welch, Guardant Health Employment, Stock. R. Gutta, None. F. Abu Rous, Astra Zeneca Other, Advisory Board. Merus Advisory Board. Pfizer Advisory Board. Boehringer Ingelheim Other, Advisory Board. Genentech/Roche Other, Advisory Board. Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Advisory Board. Daiichi Other, Advisory Board. Cigna Other, Advisory Board. Servier Other, Advisory Board. Johnson & Johnson Other, Advisory Board. Rigel Other, Advisory Board. Bayer Other, Consultant. Roche Other, Honoraria. B. R. Potugari, None.. S. Sadasivan, None. S. M. Gadgeel, Pfizer Other, Consulting. Genentech/Roche Other, Consulting. Ellipses Other, consulting. Regeneron Other, consulting. Bayer Other, consulting. Boehringer-Ingelheim Other, consulting. Astra Zeneca Other, Consulting. Astellas Other, consulting. Abbvie Other, consulting. Johnson & Johnson Other, consulting. Daichii Other, consulting. Bristol Meyers Squibb Other, Consulting. Amgen Other, Consulting. Takeda Other, consulting. Nuvation Other, consulting. Gilead Other, consulting. Glaxo Smith Kline Other, consulting.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索