PO.CL01.09 · 临床研究

在Ultima Genomics平台上基于cfDNA片段化的增强型治疗监测

Enhanced cfDNA fragmentation-based treatment monitoring on the Ultima Genomics platform

海报缩略图:在Ultima Genomics平台上基于cfDNA片段化的增强型治疗监测
编号 3863 展板 24 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 45 主讲 Laurel Millberg
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Laurel K. Millberg1, Garrett Graham1, Zachary Skidmore1, Jordan Gumm1, Kevin Jacobs1, Ariel Jaimovich2, Elena Helman2, Bryan Chesnick1, Roberto Olivares-Amaya1, Timothy Mcdaniel1, Sian Jones1, Amoolya Singh1, Lorenzo Rinaldi1

1Delfi Diagnostics, Palo Alto, CA,2Ultima Genomics, Freemont, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:游离DNA(cfDNA)片段化的全基因组分析,如DELFI肿瘤分数(DELFI-TF),已成为监测晚期癌症患者治疗反应的强大工具。在本研究中,我们评估了Ultima Genomics测序平台用于基于cfDNA片段化的监测应用的技术可行性。 方法:本研究包括两个队列:1)采自16例IV期肺癌患者的48份纵向血浆样本,以及2)采自初治IV期患者、涵盖不同肿瘤类型的4份肿瘤、正常及配对血浆样本。cfDNA使用三种方法进行测序:Illumina NovaSeq6000(平均深度:11.8x)以及Ultima UG 100(采用标准方法,每样本8个重复,11.0x,或采用ppmSeq,174.6x)。计算了片段化特征和DELFI-TF,并将DELFI-TF值与来自500基因靶向测序组合的体细胞变异等位基因频率(VAF)进行比较。通过过滤ppmSeq变异检出结果鉴定WGS体细胞变异,并用于将读段按其可能来源分为两组:肿瘤或白细胞(WBC)。随后分别计算各组以及所有读段合并的片段化特征。 结果:Ultima测序质量高,平均88.3%的碱基>Q30碱基质量,99.0%的读段成功比对。在100-220bp范围内的片段长度分布(FLD)(Pearson R > 0.998,p < 1e-5)和全基因组片段化谱(Pearson R > 0.939,p < 1e-5)在两个平台之间高度相关。空白限(自举置信区间相互重叠)和ctDNA检测(100%阳性、95.7%阴性、97.4%总体符合率)也保持一致。Ultima-DELFI-TF与VAF强相关(Pearson R=0.979,p<1e-5),在重复间显示出高精确度(稳健CV中位数:2.6%),并反映了治疗反应中的纵向ctDNA模式。通过ppmSeq的体细胞变异对读段来源进行分类后,肿瘤来源的FLD显示出比WBC来源的FLD更高比例的短片段(p值< 1e-5,KS检验)。与来自ctDNA不可检测样本的参考FLD相比,肿瘤来源的FLD比WBC来源和合并的FLD更偏离参考分布(KL散度中位数为0.227[肿瘤]、0.078[WBC]和0.089[合并])。在整个队列中,10种片段末端基序的相对频率在肿瘤来源片段中一致升高(所有p < 1e-5,卡方检验)。 结论:这些数据支持在Ultima平台上实施DELFI-TF的技术可行性。将DELFI-TF与Ultima ppmSeq相结合,能够检测肿瘤来源的读段,并为实现更灵敏的疾病检测提供了途径。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Whole-genome analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation, such as DELFI-Tumor Fraction (DELFI-TF), has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring therapeutic response in patients with late-stage cancer. In this study, we assessed the technical feasibility of the Ultima Genomics sequencing platform for a cfDNA fragmentation-based monitoring application. Methods: The study consisted of two cohorts: 1) 48 longitudinal plasma samples collected from 16 stage IV lung cancer patients and 2) 4 tumor, normal, and matched plasma samples of varying tumor types from treatment-naive stage IV patients. cfDNA was sequenced using three methods: the Illumina NovaSeq6000 (mean depth: 11.8x) and the Ultima UG 100 using the standard approach (8 replicates per sample, 11.0x) or ppmSeq (174.6x). Fragmentation features and DELFI-TF were computed, and DELFI-TF values were compared against somatic variant allele frequencies (VAF) from a 500-gene targeted sequencing panel. WGS somatic variants were identified by filtering ppmSeq variant calls and used to categorize reads into two groups based on their likely origin: tumor or white blood cell (WBC). Fragmentation features were then calculated per group as well as for all reads combined. Results: Ultima sequences were high quality, with 88.3% of bases >Q30 base quality and 99.0% of reads aligned on average. Fragment length distributions (FLDs) within the 100-220bp range (Pearson R > 0.998, p < 1e-5) and genome-wide fragmentation profiles (Pearson R > 0.939, p < 1e-5) were highly correlated between platforms. Limits of blank, with overlapping bootstrapped confidence intervals, and ctDNA detection (100% positive, 95.7% negative, and 97.4% overall percent agreement) were also consistent. Ultima-DELFI-TF correlated strongly with VAF (Pearson R=0.979, p<1e-5), showed high precision across replicates (median robust CV: 2.6%), and reflected longitudinal ctDNA patterns in treatment response. Classifying read origin by somatic variants from ppmSeq resulted in tumor-derived FLDs that displayed a higher proportion of short fragments than WBC-derived FLDs (p-value < 1e-5, KS test). When compared to a reference FLD derived from samples with undetectable ctDNA, the tumor-derived FLD deviated more from the reference distribution than the WBC-derived and combined FLDs (median KL-divergence of 0.227 [tumor], 0.078 [WBC], and 0.089 [combined]). The relative frequencies of 10 fragment end motifs were consistently elevated in the tumor-derived fragments across the whole cohort (all p < 1e-5, Chi-sq). Conclusions: These data support the technical feasibility of implementing DELFI-TF on the Ultima platform. Combining DELFI-TF with Ultima ppmSeq enables the detection of tumor-originated reads and provides a path toward more sensitive disease detection.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. K. Millberg, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. G. Graham, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. Z. Skidmore, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. J. Gumm, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. K. Jacobs, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. E. Helman, Ultima Genomics Employment. B. Chesnick, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. R. Olivares-Amaya, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. T. Mcdaniel, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. S. Jones, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. A. Singh, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Stock. L. Rinaldi, Delfi Diagnostics Employment, Independent Contractor, Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索