PO.CL05.03 · 临床研究
PARP抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂与免疫检查点抑制剂单药治疗的安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、meta分析和试验序贯分析
The safety of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors versus immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合是一种具有潜在协同效应的有前景策略。临床前研究提示,PARPi诱导的DNA损伤可能增强肿瘤免疫原性并增强ICI的疗效。目前,该方法正在多种恶性肿瘤中开展研究。然而,叠加不良事件的风险仍是一个主要问题。我们开展了首个随机对照试验(RCT)的meta分析,以评估PARPi联合ICI相比ICI单药治疗的安全性。
方法:我们开展了一项符合PRISMA标准的系统评价,检索PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆中比较PARPi+ICI联合治疗与ICI单药治疗的RCT。安全性结局为严重不良事件(SAE)、免疫介导的不良事件(imAE)、治疗中止以及特定的治疗相关不良事件。使用随机效应模型合并风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用I²统计量评估异质性。最后,进行试验序贯分析(TSA)以检验合并结果的可靠性,并将发现分类为确定性、非确定性或提示性。
结果:纳入六项RCT(DUO-E、KEYLYNK-008、ORION、SWOG 1929、MORPHEUS和BAYOU),共1537例患者,比较PARPi+ICI与ICI单药治疗。联合治疗与显著提示性更高的SAE风险(N=5;RR 1.77;95% CI:1.29-2.43;I²=0%)和贫血(N=6;RR 3.27;95% CI:2.50-4.29;I²=16%)、中性粒细胞减少(N=5;RR 4.13;95% CI:2.35-7.27;I²=18%)风险相关,并与显著确定性的白细胞减少(N=3;RR 3.93;95% CI:2.24-6.91;I²=2%)、呕吐(N=6;RR 3.47;95% CI:2.20-5.46;I²=0%)风险相关。相反,联合治疗导致imAE发生率显著非确定性地降低(N=3;RR 0.77;95% CI:0.61-0.98;I²=0%)。在ICI组分的中止(N=5;RR 1.31;95% CI:0.85-2.02;I²=0%,非确定性)、腹泻(N=6;RR 1.15;95% CI:0.81-1.64;I²=5%)、甲状腺功能减退(N=5;RR 0.77;95% CI:0.51-1.16;I²=0%)方面未观察到显著差异,然而这些结果均为非确定性。
结论:在ICI治疗基础上加用PARPi确定性地增加白细胞减少和呕吐的风险。此外,我们的TSA发现SAE、贫血和中性粒细胞减少风险增加的提示性证据。相反,虽然合并分析提示imAE风险降低,但我们的TSA显示该发现为非确定性,需进一步研究。同样,目前关于ICI中止或腹泻风险的证据也是非确定性的。基于这些发现,在考虑该联合方案时,谨慎的临床监测和风险-获益评估至关重要。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: The combination of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represents a promising strategy with potential synergistic effects. Preclinical studies suggest that PARPi-induced DNA damage may enhance tumor immunogenicity and augment the efficacy of ICI. Currently, this approach is being studied across multiple malignancies. However, the risk of additive adverse events remains a major concern. We conducted the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety of PARPi plus ICI versus ICI monotherapy.
Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review, searching PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing PARPi+ICI combination therapy against ICI monotherapy. The safety outcomes were serious adverse events (SAEs), immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs), treatment discontinuation, and specific treatment-related adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Finally, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed to test the reliability of the pooled results and classify findings as conclusive, inconclusive, or suggestive.
Results: Six RCTs (DUO-E, KEYLYNK-008, ORION, SWOG 1929, MORPHEUS, and BAYOU) encompassing 1537 patients comparing PARPi+ICI with ICI monotherapy were included. The combination was associated with a significantly suggestive higher risk of SAEs (N=5; RR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.29-2.43; I²=0%) and anemia (N=6; RR 3.27; 95% CI: 2.50-4.29; I²=16%), neutropenia (N=5; RR 4.13; 95% CI: 2.35-7.27; I²=18%), and significantly conclusive leukopenia (N=3; RR 3.93; 95% CI: 2.24-6.91; I²=2%), vomiting (N=6; RR 3.47; 95% CI: 2.20-5.46; I²=0%). Conversely, the combination led to a significantly inconclusive lower incidence of imAEs (N=3; RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98; I²=0%). No significant differences were observed in discontinuation of the ICI component (N=5; RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.85-2.02; I²=0%, INC), diarrhea (N=6; RR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.81-1.64; I²=5%), hypothyroidism (N=5; RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.51-1.16; I²=0%,), however they all were inconclusive.
Conclusions: The addition of PARPi to ICI therapy conclusively increases the risk of leukopenia and vomiting. Furthermore, our TSA found suggestive evidence for an increased risk of SAEs, anemia, and neutropenia. Conversely, while pooled analysis suggested a reduced risk of imAE, our TSA revealed this finding to be inconclusive and warrants further investigation. Similarly, the current evidence is inconclusive for the risk of ICI discontinuation or diarrhea. Based on these findings, watchful clinical monitoring and risk-benefit assessment are essential when considering this combination.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. T. Mustafa, None..
A. K. Abushanab, None..
A. Y. Alazzam, None..
M. T. Mousa, None..
A. Sa'ed, None..
N. N. Al-Bzour, None..
O. W. Rammaha, None..
Z. M. Ashour, None..
H. M. Alakhras, None..
Y. M. Al-Mashaqbah, None..
A. S. Othman, None..
N. M. Mustafa, None..
R. F. Al Banawi, None..
A. Saeed, None.