PO.CL01.07 · 临床研究
I-IV期子宫癌患者的肿瘤基因组特征与术后ctDNA状态
Tumor genomic features and postsurgical ctDNA status in patients with stage I-IV uterine cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:使用个性化、肿瘤指导的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)进行分子残留病灶(MRD)检测是子宫癌(UC)早期发现复发和评估治疗反应的有前景的生物标志物。然而,在此背景下ctDNA阳性的生物学和基因组相关因素仍知之甚少。本研究旨在评估UC患者中ctDNA的患病率和动态变化,及其与来自Altera™全面基因组分析的关键基因组改变的关联。
方法:分析了一个回顾性队列,包括200例具有可用术后ctDNA检测(Signatera™,Natera公司)及来自同一原发肿瘤组织的Altera™分析的UC患者。纳入标准要求在手术后2个月内采血,且在辅助或监测期至少有一个额外时间点。评估了ctDNA状态/动态与Altera报告的基因组结果之间的关联。
结果:在200例可评估的UC患者中,43%(86/200)在MRD窗口内为ctDNA阳性(+),57%(114/200)为ctDNA阴性(-)。按分期分层时,早期(ES,I-II期)患者中15%(12/82)、晚期(LS,III-IV期)患者中63%(74/118)为ctDNA(+),表明晚期/侵袭性疾病中MRD负荷更高。基因组相关性分析表明,在MRD窗口内,ctDNA状态与MSI-H/MSS状态显著相关(卡方检验,p<0.05)。MSS和MSI患者中ctDNA阳性率分别为78%(66/85)和22%(19/85)。POLE外切酶突变(N=11;ctDNA(+):18% [2/11];ctDNA(-):82% [9/11])见于55%(6/11)的MSS患者和45%(5/11)的MSI-H患者。在携带POLE突变的MSS患者中(N=6),17%(1/6)为ctDNA(+),83%(5/6)为ctDNA(-)。同样地,在携带POLE突变的MSI-H患者中(N=5),20%(1/5)为ctDNA(+),80%(4/5)为ctDNA(-)。值得注意的是,所有无MMR改变的MSS患者均为ctDNA(+)。纵向分析时,93%(14/15)的MMR改变且ctDNA(-)的患者在整个辅助/监测期持续保持ctDNA(-),而50%(4/8)的MMR改变且ctDNA(+)的患者清除了ctDNA。相反,在无MMR改变的组中,81%(18/95)的ctDNA(-)患者持续保持ctDNA(-),27%(21/77)的ctDNA(+)患者清除了ctDNA。
结论:术后ctDNA状态和动态与疾病分期及基因组特征相关。总体而言,MRD窗口内的ctDNA状态与MSI状态相关。术后缺乏ctDNA阳性及辅助期持续清除ctDNA与POLE改变和/或MMR改变表型相关,与更好的预后一致。鉴于ctDNA状态和动态的高预后价值,整合基于ctDNA的MRD监测可能有助于复发风险评估并指导辅助治疗决策。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Molecular residual disease (MRD) detection using personalized, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for early detection of recurrence and treatment response in uterine cancer (UC). However, the biological and genomic correlates of ctDNA positivity remain poorly understood in this setting. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and dynamics of ctDNA in UC patients, and associations with key genomic alterations derived from Altera™ comprehensive genomic profiling.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 200 UC patients with available post-surgical ctDNA testing (Signatera™, Natera, Inc.) and Altera™ profiling from the same primary tumor tissue were analyzed. Inclusion criteria required blood collection within 2 months of surgery, and availability of at least one additional timepoint during adjuvant or surveillance period. Associations between ctDNA status/dynamics and Altera-reported genomic results were assessed.
Results: Among 200 evaluable UC patients, 43% (86/200) were ctDNA-positive (+) and 57% (114/200) were ctDNA-negative (-) within the MRD window. When stratified by stage, 15% (12/82) of early-stage (ES, stages I-II) and 63% (74/118) of late-stage (LS, stages III-IV) patients were ctDNA(+), indicating a higher MRD burden in advanced/aggressive disease. Genomic correlation analyses demonstrated that during the MRD window, ctDNA status was significantly associated with MSI-H/MSS status (chi-square test, p<0.05). ctDNA positivity rate was 78% (66/85) and 22% (19/85) among MSS and MSI patients, respectively. POLE exonuclease mutations (N=11; ctDNA(+): 18% [2/11]; ctDNA(-): 82% [9/11]) were seen in 55% (6/11) of MSS and 45% (5/11) of MSI-H patients. Among MSS patients with POLE mutations (N=6), 17% (1/6) were ctDNA(+) and 83% (5/6) were ctDNA(-). Similarly, among MSI-H patients with POLE mutations (N=5), 20% (1/5) were ctDNA(+) and 80% (4/5) were ctDNA(-). Notably, all MSS patients without an MMR alteration were ctDNA(+). When analyzed longitudinally, 93% (14/15) of MMR-altered ctDNA(-) patients remained serially ctDNA(-) throughout adjuvant/surveillance period, while 50% (4/8) of MMR-altered ctDNA(+) patients cleared ctDNA. Conversely, in the non-altered MMR group, 81% (18/95) of ctDNA(-) patients remained serially ctDNA(-), and 27% (21/77) of ctDNA(+) patients cleared ctDNA.
Conclusions: Post-surgical ctDNA status and dynamics are associated with disease stage and genomic features. Overall, ctDNA status within the MRD window was associated with MSI status. Post-surgical lack of ctDNA positivity and sustained clearance of ctDNA in the adjuvant period were associated with POLE alterations and/or MMR-altered phenotype, consistent with better prognosis. Given high prognostic value of ctDNA status and dynamics, integrating ctDNA-based MRD monitoring may aid in recurrence risk assessment and guide adjuvant therapy decisions.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Berman,
AZ Other, SAB.
Atheneum Consulting Other, Consultant.
Gerson Lehman Group Other, Consultant.
GOG Travel.
Guidepoint Global Other, Consultant.
Abbvie Other, SAB.
MJH Life Sciences Other, Consultant.
Oncoclinicas do Brasil Other, Consultant.
Society for Integrative Oncology g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role).
Dava oncology Other, Consultant.
MD Outlook Other, Consultant.
Curio Sciences Other, Consultant.
Cardinal Health Other, Consultant.
B. Dwivedi,
Natera Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
C. B. Scalise,
Natera Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
P. Dutta,
Natera Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
A. ElNaggar,
Natera Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
M. Liu,
Natera Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
C. Cosgrove,
GSK ), Other, Advisory.
AbbVie Travel, Other, Advisory.
Regeneron ).
Merck Other, Advisory.