PO.CL12.01 · 临床研究
深度学习驱动的急性髓系白血病形态学分析
Deep learning-powered morphological analysis of acute myeloid leukemia
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
在本研究中,我们证明基于深度学习的单细胞图像分析能够根据形态学特征将急性髓系白血病(AML)骨髓(BM)单个核细胞(MNCs)与健康骨髓单个核细胞区分开来。我们进一步表明,对BCL2抑制剂维奈克拉(venetoclax)的体外药物反应差异与维奈克拉敏感(ven-sen)和耐药(ven-res)AML的形态学变化相关联。我们的样本队列包括来自6名健康供体和12名AML供体的冷冻保存骨髓单个核细胞样本。AML样本根据体外对维奈克拉的敏感性进行选择(6例ven-sen + 6例ven-res)。此外,队列中还纳入了来自2名AML患者的2对纵向样本(诊断-复发)。AML样本来自纳入NCT04267081试验的患者,健康供体样本来自接受髋关节置换手术的患者。样本经解冻、用2%多聚甲醛固定,并在+4°C下保存直至成像。样本制备为单细胞悬液,使用高分辨率单细胞成像与分选平台REM-I(Deepcell),每个样本采集25,000–50,000张明场图像。成像数据同步至REM-I的数据套件Axon。通过Axon进行的形态学分析基于115个细胞形态维度:51个人类可解释特征和64个深度学习特征。分析参数设置为随机抽样,每个样本的数据点数量相等。Axon上的差异形态学分析产生了散度评分(范围:0-1),作为形态学区分的量化指标。将健康样本(n=6)与合并的AML样本(n=12)进行比较,结果表明健康和AML骨髓细胞在形态学上截然不同,并在均匀流形近似与投影(UMAP)图中映射到不同的聚类。这些样本组之间的差异形态学分析在前10个差异形态学特征中突出显示了深度学习嵌入特征,散度评分范围为0.55-0.65。此外,将健康样本(n=6)与ven-sen(n=6)和ven-res(n=6)AML进行比较的分析显示,两个不同的AML样本组彼此之间以及与健康样本之间在形态学上均存在差异。最后,在对两对纵向AML患者样本进行AML进展形态学分析时,我们观察到诊断样本与复发样本之间的形态学变化。该分析还揭示,在诊断样本与复发样本之间体外维奈克拉反应变化较大的患者中出现了显著的形态学转变。我们的研究表明,深度学习驱动的前沿方法能够促进对AML高维形态学特征的分析,这是仅依赖人类感知的方法所无法实现的。这些结果表明,AML的药物反应和疾病进展可通过细胞形态学变化得以体现。
查看英文原文 English abstract
In this study we demonstrate that deep learning-based analysis of single cell images can distinguish acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells (MNCs) from healthy BM MNCs based on morphological features. We further show that differences in ex vivo drug responses to BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax links to shifts in morphology of venetoclax-sensitive (ven-sen) and -resistant (ven-res) AML. Our sample cohort consisted of cryopreserved BM MNC samples from 6 healthy donors and 12 donors with AML. The AML samples were selected based on ex vivo sensitvity to venetoclax (6 ven-sen + 6 ven-res). Moreover, 2 longitudinal sample pairs (diagnosis-relapse) from 2 AML patients were included in the cohort. The AML samples were from patients recruited to the NCT04267081 trial and healthy donor samples from patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Samples were thawed, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and stored at +4°C until the time of imaging. The samples were prepared in a single cell suspension and 25,000-50,000 brightfield images collected per sample using the high-resolution single cell imaging and sorting platform, REM-I (Deepcell). Imaging data were synced to REM-I's data suite Axon. Morphological analysis through Axon was carried out based on 115 dimensions of cell morphology; 51 human-interpretable, and 64 deep-learning features. Analysis parameters were set to random sampling with equal number of data points per sample. Differential morphology analysis on Axon yielded divergence scores (Range: 0-1) as a quantified measure of morphological distinction.Comparison of healthy samples (n=6) against pooled AML samples (n=12) demonstrated that healthy and AML BM cells are distinct in their morphology and map into different clusters in a uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) graph. Differential morphology analysis between these sample groups highlighted deep-learning embeddings in the top 10 differential morphology features, with divergence scores ranging from 0.55-0.65. Additionally, an analysis comparing healthy samples (n=6) to ven-sen (n=6) and ven-res (n=6) AML, revealed that the two different AML sample groups were distinct in morphology from each other as well as from the healthy samples. Finally, in the analysis of two longitudinal AML patient sample pairs for morphological analysis of AML progression, we observed changes in morphology between the diagnosis and relapse samples. This anaysis also revealed a substantial morphological shift in the patient that had a higher change in ex vivo ven response between the diagnosis and relapse samples. Our study demonstrates that cutting-edge methods powered by deep learning can facilitate the analysis of morphological features of AML with high-dimensionality that cannot be achieved by methods that depend only on human perception. These results indicate that drug response and disease progression in AML are reflected by changes in cell morphology.
利益披露 Disclosure
E. Olgac, None.
M. Burr,
Deepcell, Inc. Employment.
M. Suvela, None..
D. Mendoza-Ortiz, None..
E. Sinervuori, None..
H. Kuusanmäki, None.
M. Kontro,
Astellas Pharma Other, Consulting.
AbbVie Other, Consulting.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Other, Consulting.
Faron Pharmaceuticals Other, Consulting; Scientific Advisory Board Membership.
Servier Other, Consulting.
Ferring Ventures Other, Consulting.
Proteina Other, Scientific Advisory Board Membership.
C. Heckman,
Novartis ).
Oncopeptides ).
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals ).