PO.CL12.01 · 临床研究

使用基于AI的分类器通过分子谱分析识别肿瘤原发部位

Identifying the tumor site of origin using molecular profiling with an AI-based classifier

海报缩略图:使用基于AI的分类器通过分子谱分析识别肿瘤原发部位
编号 3875 展板 8 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 46 主讲 Sourat Darabi, MS;PhD
分会场 Molecular Classification and Tumor Biology in Cancer
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Carlos E. Zuazo, Michael J. Demeure, David R. Braxton, Sourat Darabi

Hoag Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:准确、及时地识别肿瘤原发部位是有效治疗癌症的关键步骤。在原发灶不明癌的病例中,基于深度学习的基因组分类器能够改善诊断流程并减少误差,已在既往研究中被验证用于临床,但缺乏临床应用价值的报告。利用分子谱分析识别原发部位在约70-95%的病例中显示出准确性,并可揭示可用于治疗的可操作靶点。我们报告在一家大容量社区癌症中心的常规实践中使用商业化AI分类工具的一系列连续病例经验。 方法:对初始被分类为原发部位不明癌的患者肿瘤进行分子谱分析和基于AI的基因组分类(GPSai),该工具能够识别90个不同的原发肿瘤部位及许多组织学亚类。分子谱分析包括对FFPE肿瘤样本进行全外显子组和全转录组测序,以及由商业实验室(Caris Life Sciences)执行的其他预测性生物标志物检测。报告了可靶向突变的识别结果,但在报告基因组改变时排除了意义未明的变异。 结果:我们回顾了2022年12月至2025年10月期间使用GPSai进行分析的313例患者的320份样本,其中77份(24%)为原发灶不明癌。无法分类的病例由分子病理学家进一步研究。在获得分类器肿瘤类型分配的243份(76%)样本中,非小细胞肺癌占比最高,为243份中的41份(16.9%),其次是胰腺腺癌,为243份中的25份(10.3%),以及结肠癌,为243份中的21份(8.6%)。分类器还分配了各种罕见癌症类型的分类(243份中的21份,即8.6%),包括横纹肌肉瘤、血管肉瘤和胸腺癌。313例患者中161例(51.4%)为女性,152例(48.6%)为男性,201例(64%)年龄在65岁及以上。320份样本中173份(54%)发现了突变,最常见的为TP53、KRAS和TERT。此外,所分析样本中51份(16%,320份中)具有高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB),10份(3%,320份中)存在错配修复缺陷,45份(14%,320份中)PD-L1(SP142)阳性,53份(16.6%,320份中)PD-L1(22c3)阳性。 结论:330份中的243份(76%)患者样本被分配了癌症诊断,与迄今已发表研究报告的范围(70-95%)一致。在无法分类的样本中,常发现可靶向突变,包括KRAS和EGFR。基于AI的肿瘤原发部位基因组分类在临床实践中有助于为患者识别治疗选择。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Identifying the primary site of origin for tumors in an accurate and timely manner is a critical step in treating cancer in an effective way. In cases of cancers of unknown primary, deep learning-based genomic classifiers that can improve diagnostic workflows and decrease inaccuracies have been validated for clinical use by previous studies, but reports of clinical utility are lacking. Use of molecular profiling for identification of site of origin has shown to be accurate in about 70-95% cases and can reveal actionable targets for treatment. We report our experience of consecutive cases where a commercial AI-based classification tool was used in routine practice at a high-volume community cancer center. Methods: Patient tumors, initially classified as cancers where the primary site was uncertain, were subjected to molecular profiling and AI-based genomic classification (GPSai) capable of recognizing a set of 90 distinct primary tumor sites and many histological subclasses. Molecular profiling consisted of whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing of FFPE tumor samples, along with other predictive biomarker assays performed by a commercial laboratory (Caris Life Sciences). The identification of targetable mutations was reported, but variants of unknown significance were excluded when reporting genomic alterations. Results: We reviewed 320 samples from 313 patients between December 2022 and October 2025 who were profiled using GPSai, 77 (24%) of which were cancers with unknown primary. Those cases which were unable to be classified were further investigated by a molecular pathologist. Of the 243 (76%) samples that received a tumor type assignment by the classifier, non-small cell lung cancer was the most represented, with 41 of 243 (16.9%), followed by pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with 25 of 243 (10.3%), and colon cancer, with 21 of 243 (8.6%). The classifier also assigned classifications of miscellaneous rare cancer types (21 of 243, or 8.6%), including rhabdomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, and thymic carcinoma. 161 of 313 (51.4%) patients were women, 152 of 313 (48.6%) were men, and 201 of 313 (64%) patients were 65 or older in age. Mutations were found in 173 of 320 (54%) samples, with the most common being in TP53, KRAS, and TERT. Further, 51 of 320 (16%) of samples analyzed had a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), 10 of 320 (3%) had a mismatch repair deficiency, and 45 of 320 (14%) samples were positive for PD-L1 (SP142) and 53 of 320 (16.6%) for PD-L1 (22c3).. Conclusion: 243 of 330 (76%) patient samples were assigned a cancer diagnosis, which is consistent with the range reported in published studies to date (70-95%). Among those that could not be classified, targetable mutations were commonly found, including KRAS and EGFR . AI-based genomic classification of tumor site of origin is useful in clinical practice in identifying treatment options for patients.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. E. Zuazo, None. M. J. Demeure, whitehawk therapeutics Other, Consulting. Orphagen Other, Consulting. Theralink Other, Consulting. TD2 OnCusp Other, Consulting. Bayer Other, Consulting. Pfize Other, Consulting. Aadi Biosciences Other, Consulting. Corcept Other, Consulting. Crinetics Other, Consulting. Lilly Other, Consulting. D. R. Braxton, Corramedical Inc. Other, Advisor and equity holder, 2024 to present. AbbVie Other, Advisory Board participant. Diaceutics Other, Advisory Board participant. Johnson & Johnson Oncology Other, US Medical Affairs Speakers bureau. Janssen pharmaceuticals Other, Biomarker advisory panels. Precidx Corp Other, Medical Advisor & equity holder. Dxome laboratories Other, Principal Investigator; with royalty; developing commercial NGS assays for clonal hematopoiesis. Corramedical Inc Other, Sub-Investigator; “Innovative 2-Chamber Specimen Separation System to Improve the Clinical utility of Small Biopsy Specimens”. ImageneAI Other, Principal Investigator; AI based biomarker prediction from Whole Slide Images. S. Darabi, BostonGene Independent Contractor.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索