PO.ET07.02 · 实验与分子治疗
在用于癌症治疗的药物中发现的新型BCRP和P-gp抑制剂
Novel inhibitors of BCRP and P-gp found among drugs used in the treatment of cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
乳腺癌耐药蛋白(BCRP)和P-糖蛋白(P-gp)是参与临床相关药物-药物相互作用(DDI)的ATP结合盒转运体。本研究旨在识别用于癌症治疗的药物中新的BCRP和P-gp抑制剂,因为许多常用抗癌和支持治疗药物的抑制作用仍不明确。使用表达BCRP或P-gp的膜囊泡转运检测,共对133种药物在50 μM下进行BCRP和P-gp抑制筛查。初步筛查后,预测了50%抑制浓度(IC50),并选择最强效的抑制剂进行实验性IC50测定。通过比较估计的肠道浓度(I2;剂量/250 ml)和最大血浆浓度(I1)与IC50值,评估了BCRP和P-gp肠道和全身抑制的风险。如果I2/IC50比值超过10或I1/IC50比值超过0.1,则认为体内抑制是可能的。随后利用机制静态模型评估人体药代动力学DDI的风险。初步筛查后,分别选择了24种和23种药物用于测定BCRP和P-gp的IC50值。在所研究的化合物中,cabozantinib(IC50为0.65 μM)、midostaurin(0.69 μM)和entrectinib(5.8 μM)显示出对BCRP最强的抑制。Nilotinib(1.0 μM)、osimertinib(2.0 μM)和abemaciclib(2.4 μM)显示出对P-gp最强的抑制。BCRP的最高I2/IC50比值见于mitotane(6190)、cabozantinib(1730)和abiraterone(831)。对于P-gp,最高的I2/IC50比值见于nilotinib(2880)、pazopanib(1580)和mitotane(1480)。因此这些化合物可能抑制肠道中的BCRP或P-gp。BCRP的最高I1/IC50比值见于doxorubicin(8.2)、etoposide(2.8)和fosaprepitant(0.84)。对于P-gp,最高的I1/IC50比值见于amscarine(1.6)、vinorelbine(0.55)和fosaprepitant(0.50)。因此这些化合物可能抑制全身性BCRP或P-gp。BCRP抑制剂的机制静态模型表明,cabozantinib、midostaurin和apalutamide几乎可以完全抑制肠道BCRP,使同时给药的rosuvastatin的暴露量分别增加94%、89%和83%。同样,P-gp抑制剂的机制静态模型表明,sorafenib、cabozantinib和nilotinib几乎可以完全抑制肠道P-gp,使同时给药的dabigatran etexilate的暴露量分别增加124%、123%和115%。我们的研究结果识别出多种新型BCRP和P-gp抑制剂,它们可能在癌症治疗中引起转运体介导的DDIs。有必要进行临床DDI研究以调查人体中的潜在相互作用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) are ATP-binding cassette transporters involved in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDI). This study aimed to identify new BCRP and P-gp inhibitors among used in the treatment of cancer, as the inhibition by many commonly used anticancer and supportive care drugs remains unclear. A total of 133 drugs were screened at 50 µM for inhibition of BCRP and P-gp using a transport assay with BCRP or P-gp-expressing membrane vesicles. Following initial screening, 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 ) were predicted, and the most potent inhibitors were selected for experimental IC 50 determination. The risks of intestinal and systemic inhibition of BCRP and P-gp were assessed by comparing the estimated intestinal concentration (I 2 ; dose/250 ml) and maximum plasma concentration (I 1 ) to the IC 50 values. If the I 2 /IC 50 ratio surpassed 10 or the I 1 /IC 50 ratio exceeded 0.1, in vivo inhibition was considered possible. Mechanistic static modelling was then utilized to assess the risk of a pharmacokinetic DDI in humans. Following initial screening, 24 and 23 drugs were selected for the determination of IC 50 values for BCRP and P-gp, respectively. Of the investigated compounds, cabozantinib (IC 50 of 0.65 µM), midostaurin (0.69 µM), and entrectinib (5.8 µM) showed the strongest inhibition of BCRP. Nilotinib (1.0 µM), osimertinib (2.0 µM), and abemaciclib (2.4 µM) showed the strongest inhibition of the P-gp. The highest I 2 /IC 50 ratios for BCRP were observed for mitotane (6190), cabozantinib (1730), and abiraterone (831). For P-gp, the highest I 2 /IC 50 ratios were observed for nilotinib (2880), pazopanib (1580), and mitotane (1480). These compounds might therefore inhibit BCRP or P-gp in the intestine. The highest I 1 /IC 50 ratios for BCRP were observed for doxorubicin (8.2), etoposide (2.8), and fosaprepitant (0.84). For P-gp, the highest I 1 /IC 50 ratios were observed for amscarine (1.6), vinorelbine (0.55), and fosaprepitant (0.50). These compounds might therefore inhibit systemic BCRP or P-gp. Mechanistic static model for BCRP inhibitors suggested that cabozantinib, midostaurin, and apalutamide could almost fully inhibit intestinal BCRP, increasing the exposure to concomitantly administered rosuvastatin by 94%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. Similarly, mechanistic static model for P-gp inhibitors suggested that sorafenib, cabozantinib, and nilotinib could almost fully inhibit intestinal P-gp, increasing the exposure to concomitantly administered dabigatran etexilate by 124%, 123%, and 115%, respectively. Our findings identified multiple novel BCRP and P-gp inhibitors, which may cause transporter-mediated DDIs in cancer treatment. Clinical DDI studies are warranted to investigate the potential interactions in humans.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Timonen, None..
F. Deng, None..
M. Niemi, None.