PO.IM01.02 · 免疫学

肿瘤微环境表型作为免疫浸润潜在生物标志物的特征分析

Characterization of tumor microenvironment phenotypes as potential biomarkers for immune infiltration

海报缩略图:肿瘤微环境表型作为免疫浸润潜在生物标志物的特征分析
编号 2907 展板 17 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 10 主讲 Iqra Arif, No Degree
分会场 Modifiers of Inflammation and the Tumor Microenvironment
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Iqra A. Arif, Ruchi Shah, Katherine A. Johnson, Cheri A. Pasch, Dustin Deming

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Madison, WI

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:需要更优的生物标志物来识别与肿瘤浸润性CD8+ T细胞(TILs)及免疫治疗应答相关的免疫许可性肿瘤微环境(TME)表型。肌成纤维细胞型和炎症型癌症相关成纤维细胞(myCAFs和iCAFs)是参与细胞外基质重塑和免疫调节的CAF亚型。多功能蛋白聚糖(Versican,VCAN)是一种基质蛋白聚糖,其蛋白水解产物versikine(Vkine)可调控CRC TME中的免疫浸润。在此,我们将VCAN蛋白水解与CAF表型共同评估,作为免疫浸润的潜在生物标志物。 方法:采用免疫组织化学方法,在636例原发和转移性患者肿瘤样本中评估下述CAF标志物以及VCAN和Vkine。CD8+ TILs按每高倍视野(HPF)进行定量。所有其他染色根据基质丰度和强度以0-3分制评分。myCAF(alphaSMA和TAGLN)和iCAF标志物(PDPN和ICAM1)评分取平均值并按既往方法分类。VCAN状态按既往方法分类。 结果:在VCAN蛋白水解弱(VPW)的癌症中,25.9%为myCAF高,9.6%为iCAF高,31.9%两者均不高,32.7%两者均高。在VCAN蛋白水解为主(VPP)的癌症中,31.9%为myCAF高,16%为iCAF高,30.3%两者均高。在VCAN/Vkine低(VVL)的癌症中,18.5%为myCAF高,14.1%为iCAF高,14.1%两者均高。在VPW癌症中,各CAF表型的平均CD8+ TILs/HPF均相对较低,其中两者均不高的表型TILs最多(5.7/HPF)。在VVL癌症中,两者均高(3.2)和myCAF高(4.5)表型的平均CD8+ TILs/HPF低于iCAF高(7.7)和两者均不高(12.5)表型。对于VPP癌症,myCAF高癌症的平均CD8+ TILs/HPF(10)显著低于所有其他表型(两者均不高24.2,iCAF高16.5,两者均高23.4)(p=0.045)。 结论:在VVL和VPW转移性癌症中,CAFs缺失或iCAF高表达与T细胞浸润增强相关。对于VPP癌症,myCAF高表型的存在并不抑制T细胞浸润,尽管相对于CAFs缺失或iCAFs存在的癌症有所降低。CAF表型与versican状态的组合应作为免疫治疗应答的生物标志物进一步评估。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background:   Improved biomarkers are needed to identify immune permissive tumor microenvironment (TME) phenotypes that correlate with tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells (TILs) and immunotherapy response. Myofibroblastic and inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs and iCAFs) are CAF subtypes involved in remodeling extracellular matrix and immunomodulation. Versican (VCAN), a matrix proteoglycan, and its proteolysis product, versikine (Vkine), regulate immune infiltration in the CRC TME. Here, we evaluate VCAN proteolysis and CAF phenotypes together as potential biomarkers for immune infiltration.  Methods:    Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the below CAF markers, as well as VCAN and Vkine, in 636 primary and metastatic patient tumor samples. CD8+ TILs were quantified per high-powered field (HPF). All other stains were scored on a scale of 0-3 based on stromal abundance and intensity. MyCAF (alphaSMA and TAGLN) and iCAF marker (PDPN and ICAM1) scores were averaged and categorized as previous. VCAN status was categorized as previous. Results:  Of the VCAN proteolytic weak (VPW) cancers, 25.9% were myCAF high, 9.6% were iCAF high, 31.9% were neither high, and 32.7% were both high. Of the VCAN proteolytic predominant (VPP) cancers, 31.9% were myCAF high, 16% were iCAF high, and 30.3% were both high. Of the VCAN/Vkine low (VVL) cancers, 18.5% were myCAF high, 14.1% were iCAF high, and 14.1% were both high. In VPW cancers, the mean CD8+ TILs/HPF were relatively low across all CAF phenotypes with the neither high phenotype having the greatest TILs (5.7/HPF). In VVL cancers, the mean CD8+ TILs/HPF in the both high (3.2) and myCAF high (4.5) phenotypes were less than that observed with the iCAF high (7.7) and neither high (12.5) phenotpyes. For VPP cancers, the mean CD8+ TILs/HPF in myCAF high cancers (10) is significantly lower (p=0.045) than in all other phenotypes (neither high 24.2, iCAF high 16.5, both high 23.4). Conclusion: The absence of CAFs or the presence of high iCAF correlates with enhanced T-cell infiltration in VVL and VPW metastatic cancers. For VPP cancers, the presence of a high myCAF phenotype does not suppress T-cell infiltration, though it is reduced relative to cancers with an absence of CAFs or presence of iCAFs. The combination of CAF phenotype and versican status should be further assessed as a biomarker for immune therapy response. 
利益披露 Disclosure
I. A. Arif, None.. R. Shah, None.. K. A. Johnson, None.. C. A. Pasch, None. D. Deming, Merck Other, Research funding. Genentech Other, Research Funding. Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Research Funding and Consulting/Advisory Boards. Pfizer Other, Research Funding and Consulting/Advisory Boards. promega Other, Research Funding. Arcus Other, Research Funding. Ipsen Other, Research Funding. Eli Lilly Other, Research Funding and Consulting/Advisory Boards. Transthera Other, Research Funding. ImmutoScientific Other, Research Funding. Foundation Medicine Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Illumina Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Regeneron Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Aadi Biosciences Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Taiho Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Inocras Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. DoMoreDX Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Fortvita Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Takeda Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards. Exelixis Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索