PO.IM01.11 · 免疫学
Bhlhe40塑造对抗PD1和抗CTLA4免疫检查点治疗的不同T细胞反应
Bhlhe40 shapes distinct T cell reponses to anti PD1 and anti CTLA4 immune checkpoint therapy
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
使CD4和CD8 T细胞得以维持抗肿瘤免疫的转录程序尚未完全明确。我们研究了转录调节因子Bhlhe40在抗PD-1和抗CTLA-4免疫检查点治疗(ICT)期间塑造CD4和CD8 T细胞反应中的作用。使用条件性敲除小鼠,我们发现抗PD-1的疗效依赖于CD8 T细胞内在的Bhlhe40,CD4 T细胞可能也有贡献。相比之下,抗CTLA-4主要依赖于CD4 T细胞内在的Bhlhe40,即使CD8 T细胞中缺失Bhlhe40仍保持有效。Bhlhe40的缺失使CD8 T细胞偏向TCF-1+的初始/祖细胞耗竭样状态,损害IFNgamma的产生、糖酵解和线粒体适能。CD8 T细胞内在的Bhlhe40也是ICT驱动的巨噬细胞由抑制性CX3CR1+向iNOS+巨噬细胞重塑所必需的。对人类癌症数据集的分析显示,BHLHE40在肿瘤反应性和活化/耗竭的CD8 T细胞中富集,与TCF7(TCF-1)呈负相关,与TOX和IFNG呈正相关。重要的是,在一组基底细胞癌患者队列中,ICT应答者中观察到更高的BHLHE40表达。总之,这些发现表明Bhlhe40是一种亚群特异性和治疗特异性的T细胞程序调节因子,控制着效应分化、代谢和ICT疗效,为抗PD-1与抗CTLA-4不同作用模式提供了机制依据。
查看英文原文 English abstract
The transcriptional programs that enable CD4 and CD8 T cells to sustain anti-tumor immunity are not fully defined. We investigated the role of the transcriptional regulator Bhlhe40 in shaping CD4 and CD8 T cell responses during anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). Using conditional knockout mice, we found that anti-PD-1 efficacy depends on CD8 T cell-intrinsic Bhlhe40, with potential contribution from CD4 T cells. In contrast, anti-CTLA-4 relies primarily on CD4 T cell-intrinsic Bhlhe40 and remains effective even without Bhlhe40 in CD8 T cells. Loss of Bhlhe40 skewed CD8 T cells toward TCF-1+ naïve/progenitor exhausted-like states, impairing IFNgamma production, glycolysis, and mitochondrial fitness. CD8 T cell-intrinsic Bhlhe40 was also required for ICT-driven macrophage remodeling from suppressive CX3CR1 + to iNOS + macrophages. Analysis of human cancer datasets showed that BHLHE40 is enriched in tumor-reactive and activated/exhausted CD8 T cells, correlating inversely with TCF7 (TCF-1) and positively with TOX and IFNG . Importantly, higher BHLHE40 expression was observed in responders to ICT in a cohort of patients with basal cell cancer. Together, these findings show Bhlhe40 is a subset- and therapy-specific regulator of T cell programs, controlling effector differentiation, metabolism, and ICT efficacy, providing a mechanistic basis for the divergent modes of action of anti-PD-1 versus anti-CTLA-4.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Saha, None..
T. Minowa, None..
A. S. Shavkunov, None..
A. J. Salmon, None..
S. Keshari, None..
K. E. Pauken, None..
K. H. Hu, None..
K. Chen, None..
M. M. Gubin, None.