PO.IM01.11 · 免疫学
细胞质PD-L1水平与小细胞肺癌的肿瘤进展相关
Cytoplasmic PD-L1 levels are associated with tumor progression in small cell lung cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
肺癌是癌症相关死亡的首要原因。小细胞肺癌(SCLC)约占肺癌诊断的10-15%,是一种异常致命的亚型。由于生长迅速、早期转移和治疗耐药,SCLC常在数月内导致患者死亡。标准一线铂-依托泊苷(PE)治疗显示出显著效果和高反应率。然而,复发几乎不可避免,且复发肿瘤往往对进一步治疗耐药。近来,在SCLC患者中,将抗PD-L1抗体(阿替利珠单抗或度伐利尤单抗)与PE治疗联合应用,相较于单独标准PE治疗显著改善了生存率。然而,与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)不同,包括抗PD-1联合PE在内的其他免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在SCLC中未显示生存获益。为何只有抗PD-L1在SCLC中有效仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。此外,与其他癌症不同,抗PD-L1在SCLC中的疗效与细胞膜上的PD-L1表达不相关。抗PD-L1在SCLC中的选择性疗效提示它可能通过独特的作用机制发挥功能,独立于传统的T细胞依赖性通路。我们此前的研究发现PD-L1以癌细胞内在的方式发挥作用,独立于与PD-1的相互作用。基于这些结果,我们假设非膜性的细胞内PD-L1促成癌细胞内在的PD-L1功能,并与肿瘤进展相关。为检验这一假设,我们对不同疾病分期患者的SCLC标本和SCLC细胞系进行了免疫组化(IHC)和免疫荧光(ICC)。我们的分析显示,在培养的SCLC细胞或患者标本中很少检测到膜性PD-L1。相反,PD-L1表达主要见于SCLC肿瘤细胞的细胞质和细胞核中。在72例SCLC样本中,59例(82%)表现出细胞质PD-L1,10例(14%)显示核PD-L1,而仅6例(8%)显示膜性PD-L1表达。我们观察到,与I期肿瘤相比,II期和III期SCLC肿瘤中细胞质PD-L1的流行率和强度呈增加趋势。相比之下,在大多数NSCLC肿瘤细胞的细胞膜上很容易检测到膜性PD-L1。尽管膜性PD-L1表达极少,抗PD-L1度伐利尤单抗仍以独立于T细胞的方式显著增强了顺铂对SCLC细胞的细胞毒性。我们的发现提示,细胞内而非膜性PD-L1在SCLC进展中发挥关键作用。对其功能和机制的进一步研究可能指导开发更有效的SCLC疗法。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for about 10-15% of lung cancer diagnoses, is an exceptionally lethal subtype. Due to rapid growth, early metastasis, and resistance to therapy, SCLC often causes patient death within months. Standard first-line platinum-etoposide (PE) therapy shows significant effects and high response rates. However, recurrence is nearly inevitable, and recurrent tumors are often resistant to further treatment. Recently, combination treatments incorporating an anti-PD-L1 antibody (either atezolizumab or durvalumab) alongside PE therapy have significantly improved survival rates compared to standard PE treatment alone in SCLC patients. However, in contrast to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-1 combined with PE, have not shown survival benefits in SCLC. The reason why only anti-PD-L1 demonstrate in SCLC remains unclear and requires further investigation. Furthermore, unlike in other cancers, the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 in SCLC is not correlated with PD-L1 expression on the cell membrane. The selective efficacy of anti-PD-L1 in SCLC suggests that it may function through a distinct mechanism of action, independent of the traditional T cell-dependent pathway. Our previous study found that PD-L1 operates in a cancer cell-intrinsic manner, independent of the interaction with PD-1. Based on these results, we hypothesize that non-membranous intracellular PD-L1 contributes to cancer cell-intrinsic PD-L1 functions and is associated with tumor progression. To test this hypothesis, we performed immunocytochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (ICC) on SCLC specimens from patients at various disease stages and on SCLC cell lines. Our analyses revealed that membranous PD-L1 was rarely detected in SCLC cells in culture or in patient specimens. Instead, PD-L1 expression was predominantly found in the cytoplasm and nucleus of SCLC tumor cells. Among 72 SCLC samples, 59 cases (82%) exhibited cytoplasmic PD-L1, 10 cases (14%) displayed nuclear PD-L1, while only 6 cases (8%) showed membranous PD-L1 expression. We observed a trend toward increased cytoplasmic PD-L1 prevalence and intensity in stage II and III SCLC tumors compared with stage I tumors. In contrast, membranous PD-L1 was readily detected on the cell membrane of most NSCLC tumor cells. Despite the minimal membranous PD-L1 expression, anti-PD-L1 durvalumab significantly increased cisplatin cytotoxicity in SCLC cells independent of T cells. Our findings suggest that intracellular, rather than membranous, PD-L1 plays a key role in SCLC progression. Further studies on its functions and mechanisms may guide the development of more effective SCLC therapies.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Lee, None..
A. Das, None..
H. Cheon, None.