PO.IM01.11 · 免疫学
PD1-PD-L2相互作用的空间图谱提示非小细胞肺癌中存在另一条检查点轴
Spatial mapping of PD1-PD-L2 interactions suggests an additional checkpoint axis in non-small cell lung cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂已彻底改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗,但持久获益仍然有限。当前的生物标志物,如PD-L1免疫组化(IHC),测量的是蛋白丰度而非功能性的PD1-配体结合,因此预测价值有限。第二种PD1配体PD-L2常被忽视,但在细胞环境中可能影响免疫调节。因此,PD1-PD-L1轴的激活不足以解释临床相关的免疫机制。
方法:我们分析了一组早期、手术切除的NSCLC组织微阵列(N=345),该队列此前已经过广泛的免疫分型,包括PD-L1 IHC和PD1-PD-L1邻近连接分析(PLA)[1]。我们通过荧光PLA(与CD3和泛细胞角蛋白共染色)扩展了这项工作,以可视化肿瘤、基质和T细胞区室中的PD1-PD-L2相互作用,同时通过IHC检测PD-L2蛋白表达。图像分析在QuPath中进行。
结果:在正常肺组织中,PD-L2主要表达于巨噬细胞和偶见的粒细胞。在肿瘤中,鳞状细胞癌(SqCC)显示出比腺癌(AD)更高的PD-L2表达(p=0.003)和更多的PD1-PD-L2相互作用(p=0.047),与更强的免疫浸润一致。值得注意的是,包含PD-L1和PD-L2基因座的9p24.1扩增在SqCC中也观察到更为频繁。PD1-PD-L2相互作用呈现出与PD1-PD-L1不同的免疫背景。在肿瘤细胞区室内,PD1-PD-L2仅与CD4⁺、CD8⁺、CD163⁺、FoxP3⁺、PD1和PD-L1弱相关,而PD1-PD-L1与这些免疫细胞群显示出强关联,提示部分不同的免疫调节机制。在基质中,两种配体显示出更为相似的免疫关联模式。临床上,高PD1-PD-L1相互作用总体上与更好的预后相关。相比之下,SqCC中的PD1-PD-L2相互作用仅显示出更好生存的趋势(p=0.061),而在AD中则显示出较短生存的趋势(p=0.092)。此外,肿瘤基质中区室特异性的PD1-PD-L2相互作用与不良预后相关,尤其是在T细胞丰富基质的SqCC中(p=0.033)。
结论:我们的研究结果提示,PD1-PD-L2代表了NSCLC中一条在空间上和生物学上均不同的检查点轴,在免疫表型和临床关联方面均与PD1-PD-L1不同。纳入PD-L2特异性相互作用分析可能有助于增进对检查点生物学的理解,并支持更精细的患者分层,尤其是在PD-L2共扩增和上调似乎更为常见的SqCC中。
参考文献:[1] Lindberg A, Muhl L, Yu H, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20:625-640。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet durable benefit remains limited. Current biomarkers, such as PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), measure protein abundance rather than functional PD1-ligand engagement and therefore provide limited predictive value. The second PD1 ligand, PD-L2, has often been ignored, but may influence immune regulation in the cellular context. Therefore, the activation of the PD1-PD-L1 axis is not sufficient to explain clinically relevant immune mechanisms.
Methods: We analyzed a tissue microarray of early-stage, surgically resected NSCLC (N=345), a cohort previously extensively immunoprofiled, including PD-L1 IHC and PD1-PD-L1 proximity ligation assay (PLA) [1]. We extended this work using fluorescent PLA (co-stained for CD3 and pan-cytokeratin) to visualize PD1-PD-L2 interactions across tumor, stromal, and T-cell compartments, alongside PD-L2 protein expression by IHC. Image analysis was performed in QuPath.
Results: In normal lung, PD-L2 was primarily expressed on macrophages and occasional granulocytes. Among tumors, squamous cell carcinomas (SqCC) showed higher PD-L2 expression than adenocarcinomas (AD) (p=0.003) and increased PD1-PD-L2 interactions (p=0.047), consistent with greater immune infiltration. Notably, amplification of 9p24.1, including the PD-L1 and PD-L2 locus, was also observed more frequent in SqCC. PD1-PD-L2 interactions displayed a distinct immune contexture from PD1-PD-L1. Within tumor cell compartment, PD1-PD-L2 correlated only weakly with CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD163⁺, FoxP3⁺, PD1, and PD-L1, while PD1-PD-L1 showed strong associations with these immune populations, indicating partly distinct mechanisms of immune regulation. In the stroma, both ligands showed more similar immune-association patterns. Clinically, high PD1-PD-L1 interaction was generally associated with better prognosis. In contrast, PD1-PD-L2 interaction in SqCC showed only a trend toward better survival (p=0.061), whereas in AD it demonstrated a trend toward shorter survival (p=0.092). Also, compartment-specific PD1-PD-L2 interactions in the tumor stroma were associated with poor prognosis, particularly in SqCC with T cell-rich stroma (p=0.033).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PD1-PD-L2 represents a spatially and biologically distinct checkpoint axis in NSCLC, differing from PD1-PD-L1 in immune phenotypes and clinical associations. Including PD-L2-specific interaction analyses may enhance understanding of checkpoint biology and support refined patient stratification, particularly in SqCC, where PD-L2 co-amplification and upregulation appear to be more common.
References: [1] Lindberg A, Muhl L, Yu H, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20:625-640.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Gorbunova, None..
A. Lindberg, None..
L. Muhl, None..
G. Lessan Toussi, None..
H. Yu, None..
P. Micke, None..
C. Strell, None.