PO.IM01.11 · 免疫学

PD1-PD-L2相互作用的空间图谱提示非小细胞肺癌中存在另一条检查点轴

Spatial mapping of PD1-PD-L2 interactions suggests an additional checkpoint axis in non-small cell lung cancer

海报缩略图:PD1-PD-L2相互作用的空间图谱提示非小细胞肺癌中存在另一条检查点轴
编号 2820 展板 25 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 7 主讲 Carina Strell, Dr Rer Nat
分会场 Immune Checkpoints
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Anna Gorbunova1, Amanda Lindberg2, Lars Muhl3, Ghazal Lessan Toussi1, Hui Yu2, Patrick Micke2, Carina Strell2

1Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway,2Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden,3Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂已彻底改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗,但持久获益仍然有限。当前的生物标志物,如PD-L1免疫组化(IHC),测量的是蛋白丰度而非功能性的PD1-配体结合,因此预测价值有限。第二种PD1配体PD-L2常被忽视,但在细胞环境中可能影响免疫调节。因此,PD1-PD-L1轴的激活不足以解释临床相关的免疫机制。 方法:我们分析了一组早期、手术切除的NSCLC组织微阵列(N=345),该队列此前已经过广泛的免疫分型,包括PD-L1 IHC和PD1-PD-L1邻近连接分析(PLA)[1]。我们通过荧光PLA(与CD3和泛细胞角蛋白共染色)扩展了这项工作,以可视化肿瘤、基质和T细胞区室中的PD1-PD-L2相互作用,同时通过IHC检测PD-L2蛋白表达。图像分析在QuPath中进行。 结果:在正常肺组织中,PD-L2主要表达于巨噬细胞和偶见的粒细胞。在肿瘤中,鳞状细胞癌(SqCC)显示出比腺癌(AD)更高的PD-L2表达(p=0.003)和更多的PD1-PD-L2相互作用(p=0.047),与更强的免疫浸润一致。值得注意的是,包含PD-L1和PD-L2基因座的9p24.1扩增在SqCC中也观察到更为频繁。PD1-PD-L2相互作用呈现出与PD1-PD-L1不同的免疫背景。在肿瘤细胞区室内,PD1-PD-L2仅与CD4⁺、CD8⁺、CD163⁺、FoxP3⁺、PD1和PD-L1弱相关,而PD1-PD-L1与这些免疫细胞群显示出强关联,提示部分不同的免疫调节机制。在基质中,两种配体显示出更为相似的免疫关联模式。临床上,高PD1-PD-L1相互作用总体上与更好的预后相关。相比之下,SqCC中的PD1-PD-L2相互作用仅显示出更好生存的趋势(p=0.061),而在AD中则显示出较短生存的趋势(p=0.092)。此外,肿瘤基质中区室特异性的PD1-PD-L2相互作用与不良预后相关,尤其是在T细胞丰富基质的SqCC中(p=0.033)。 结论:我们的研究结果提示,PD1-PD-L2代表了NSCLC中一条在空间上和生物学上均不同的检查点轴,在免疫表型和临床关联方面均与PD1-PD-L1不同。纳入PD-L2特异性相互作用分析可能有助于增进对检查点生物学的理解,并支持更精细的患者分层,尤其是在PD-L2共扩增和上调似乎更为常见的SqCC中。 参考文献:[1] Lindberg A, Muhl L, Yu H, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20:625-640。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet durable benefit remains limited. Current biomarkers, such as PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), measure protein abundance rather than functional PD1-ligand engagement and therefore provide limited predictive value. The second PD1 ligand, PD-L2, has often been ignored, but may influence immune regulation in the cellular context. Therefore, the activation of the PD1-PD-L1 axis is not sufficient to explain clinically relevant immune mechanisms. Methods: We analyzed a tissue microarray of early-stage, surgically resected NSCLC (N=345), a cohort previously extensively immunoprofiled, including PD-L1 IHC and PD1-PD-L1 proximity ligation assay (PLA) [1]. We extended this work using fluorescent PLA (co-stained for CD3 and pan-cytokeratin) to visualize PD1-PD-L2 interactions across tumor, stromal, and T-cell compartments, alongside PD-L2 protein expression by IHC. Image analysis was performed in QuPath. Results: In normal lung, PD-L2 was primarily expressed on macrophages and occasional granulocytes. Among tumors, squamous cell carcinomas (SqCC) showed higher PD-L2 expression than adenocarcinomas (AD) (p=0.003) and increased PD1-PD-L2 interactions (p=0.047), consistent with greater immune infiltration. Notably, amplification of 9p24.1, including the PD-L1 and PD-L2 locus, was also observed more frequent in SqCC. PD1-PD-L2 interactions displayed a distinct immune contexture from PD1-PD-L1. Within tumor cell compartment, PD1-PD-L2 correlated only weakly with CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD163⁺, FoxP3⁺, PD1, and PD-L1, while PD1-PD-L1 showed strong associations with these immune populations, indicating partly distinct mechanisms of immune regulation. In the stroma, both ligands showed more similar immune-association patterns. Clinically, high PD1-PD-L1 interaction was generally associated with better prognosis. In contrast, PD1-PD-L2 interaction in SqCC showed only a trend toward better survival (p=0.061), whereas in AD it demonstrated a trend toward shorter survival (p=0.092). Also, compartment-specific PD1-PD-L2 interactions in the tumor stroma were associated with poor prognosis, particularly in SqCC with T cell-rich stroma (p=0.033). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PD1-PD-L2 represents a spatially and biologically distinct checkpoint axis in NSCLC, differing from PD1-PD-L1 in immune phenotypes and clinical associations. Including PD-L2-specific interaction analyses may enhance understanding of checkpoint biology and support refined patient stratification, particularly in SqCC, where PD-L2 co-amplification and upregulation appear to be more common. References: [1] Lindberg A, Muhl L, Yu H, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20:625-640.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Gorbunova, None.. A. Lindberg, None.. L. Muhl, None.. G. Lessan Toussi, None.. H. Yu, None.. P. Micke, None.. C. Strell, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索