PO.MCB03.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

研究HER4突变对HER2信号的影响

Investigating the impact of HER4 mutations on HER2 signaling

海报缩略图:研究HER4突变对HER2信号的影响
编号 3303 展板 10 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 24 主讲 Denis Collins, PhD
分会场 RTK-ERBB-PI3K and New Targets in Therapeutic Resistance
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Denis M. Collins1, Marta Valenti2, Johanna Gaubatz2, Debbie O'Reilly2, Birgit Bossenmaier3, Bryan Hennessy4, John Paul Crown5

1Cancer Biotherapeutics Research Group, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland,2Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland,3Bossenmaier Consulting, Munich, Germany,4Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland,5St. Vincent's University Hospital - Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:HER2在约20%的乳腺癌(BC)中扩增,是HER/ErbB受体酪氨酸激酶家族的成员,该家族还包括EGFR、HER2和HER3。HER4在7%的HER2+乳腺癌中发生突变,但关于HER4点突变(MUT)对HER2信号影响的数据有限。既往工作已识别EGFR、p38 MAPK、Src和STAT3为受HER4过表达影响的靶点。HEK293细胞表达野生型(WT)EGFR,而HER2、HER3和HER4的水平可忽略不计。本研究利用HEK293细胞中基于质粒的过表达,检测WT HER2与WT HER4或HER4点突变(2个胞外结构域(ECD)和6个胞内结构域(ICD))的共表达。 方法:研究了从COSMIC数据库识别的8个HER4突变。四个被预测为有害/损害性,四个为中性/耐受性(Provean/SIFT)。MUT1(p.E202D)和MUT2(p.P224R)位于ECD;MUT3-MUT8(p.T1036I、p.Y1242C、p.H1245N、p.S1246R、p.L1247M、p.H1255N)位于ICD。使用突变引物(Sigma Aldrich)进行定点诱变(QuikChange Lightning),以pRK5 HER4 WT为模板生成8个经验证的HER4突变质粒(SequiServe)。用空载体、GFP对照、WT HER2质粒、WT HER4、WT HER2/WT HER4,或WT HER2与各HER4突变组合,转染(Fugene)HEK293细胞。通过Western印迹确认转染。蛋白裂解物一式三份通过反相蛋白质芯片(RPPA)分析,以定量50个总蛋白和34个磷酸化蛋白(84个靶点)。通过Student's t检验确定显著变化(p < 0.05)。 结果:转染WT HER2或WT HER4后,总EGFR水平未变化,但WT HER2和WT HER4单独或联合时,EGFR在Y992和Y1068处的磷酸化显著增加(p<0.05)。与WT HER4不同,WT HER2未增加p38 MAPK、Src或STAT3的磷酸化水平。与WT HER2共转染时,WT HER4诱导的变化在Src(Y416)(p=0.02)和STAT3(Y705)(p<0.01)上得以维持,但p38 MAPK(T180/Y182)(p=0.11)上未维持。在WT HER2存在下,HER4 MUT6增加了磷酸化HER2(Y1248)水平(p=0.01),而MUT2、6、7和8显著增加了磷酸化EGFR(Y1173)水平。此外,HER4 MUT6降低了Src(Y527)磷酸化(p=0.01)。 结论:我们的数据报告了不同于HER2的HER4激活的胞内信号通路,以及能够改变EGFR和HER2活性的HER4突变。这些结果为所研究的HER4突变对HER2信号的表型影响提供了初步证据。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: HER2 is amplified in ~20% of breast cancers (BCs) and is a member of the HER/ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family that also includes EGFR, HER2 and HER3. HER4 is mutated in 7% of HER2+ BCs but there are limited data on the impact of HER4 point mutations (MUTs) on HER2 signaling. Previous work has identified EGFR, p38 MAPK, Src and STAT3 as targets impacted by HER4 overexpression. HEK293 cells express wild type (WT) EGFR and negligible levels of HER2, HER3 and HER4. Using plasmid-based overexpression in HEK293 cells, this study examines the co-expression of WT HER2 with WT HER4 or HER4 point MUTs (2 extracellular domain (ECD) and 6 intracellular domain (ICD)). Methods: Eight HER4 MUTs identified from the COSMIC database were investigated. Four were predicted to be deleterious/damaging and four neutral/tolerated (Provean/SIFT). MUT1 (p.E202D) and MUT2 (p.P224R) are in the ECD; MUT3-MUT8 (p.T1036I, p.Y1242C, p.H1245N, p.S1246R, p.L1247M, p.H1255N) are in the ICD. Mutant primers (Sigma Aldrich) were used for site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange Lightning) with pRK5 HER4 WT used as a template to generate eight validated HER4 MUT plasmids (SequiServe). HEK293 cells were transfected (Fugene) with either empty vector, GFP control, WT HER2 plasmid, WT HER4, WT HER2/WT HER4, or WT HER2 combined with each HER4 MUT. Transfection was confirmed by Western blot. Protein lysates were analyzed in triplicate by reverse phase protein array (RPPA) to quantify 50 total and 34 phospho-proteins (84 targets). Significant changes (p < 0.05) were determined by Student's t-test. Results: Total EGFR levels were unchanged in response to transfection with WT HER2 or WT HER4, however EGFR phosphorylation at Y992 and Y1068 increased significantly (p<0.05) for WT HER2 and WT HER4 individually or in combination. Unlike WT HER4, WT HER2 did not increase phosphorylated levels of p38 MAPK, Src or STAT3. When co-transfected with WT HER2, changes induced by WT HER4 were maintained for Src (Y416) (p=0.02) and STAT3 (Y705) (p<0.01) but not p38 MAPK (T180/Y182) (p=0.11). In the presence of WT HER2, HER4 MUT6 increased phosphorylated HER2 (Y1248) levels (p=0.01), and MUTs 2, 6, 7 and 8 significantly increased levels of phosphorylated EGFR (Y1173). In addition, HER4 MUT6 reduced Src (Y527) phosphorylation (p=0.01). Conclusions: Our data reports HER4-activated intracellular signaling pathways distinct from HER2, and HER4 MUTs that can alter EGFR and HER2 activity. These results provide preliminary evidence for the phenotypic impact of the HER4 MUTs examined on HER2 signaling.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. M. Collins, Puma Biotechnology ), Research funding and materials. Sanofi ), Materials for research. Roche/Genentech ), Research materials. WntResearch ), Research funding and materials. M. Valenti, Puma Biotechnology ), Research funding. J. Gaubatz, None.. D. O'Reilly, None. B. Bossenmaier, Pieris Employment. B. Hennessy, None. J. P. Crown, Puma Biotechnology ). Replimune Other, Consultant fees. Immunocore Other, Consultant fees. MSD Other, Consultant fees. Novartis Other, Honoraria. Pierre Fabre Other, Honoraria. Regeneron Travel. MSD Travel. Pfizer Travel. Astrazeneca Travel. Novartis Travel. Replimune Other, Data safety monitoring. Cancer Clinical Research Trust g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role). Oncoassure Stock. Akkure Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索