PO.CL01.18 · 临床研究

利用外周血ctDNA对实性肺结节进行无创诊断:一个多模态平台的开发

Noninvasive diagnosis of solid pulmonary nodules using peripheral blood ctDNA: Development of a multimodality platform

海报缩略图:利用外周血ctDNA对实性肺结节进行无创诊断:一个多模态平台的开发
编号 1091 展板 1 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 43 主讲 Bai Guangyu, MD
分会场 Early Detection Biomarkers 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Gunangyu Bai1, Luyan Shen1, Shaohua Ma1, Shugeng Gao2

1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institution, Beijing, China,2National Cencer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:早期、无创且准确地区分实性肺结节的恶性与良性对于避免过度治疗和延误干预都至关重要。我们旨在开发一个可临床转化的多组学模型,整合血浆ctDNA甲基化、CT影像组学和常规临床数据,以改善对不确定的纯实性肺结节(≤3 cm)的术前诊断。 方法:在一项前瞻性双中心研究中,我们连续纳入了计划接受手术切除的、患有不确定纯实性肺结节(≤3 cm)的成年人。患者按入组时间被分配到一个建模队列和一个独立验证队列(7:3)。我们构建了三个单模态模型(临床、影像组学、甲基化)和一个融合的多组学模型。我们在每个模态内对特征进行标准化,去除低方差和低相关性特征,然后应用弹性网络(Elastic Net)和基于SHAP的排序,随后进行降维和逐元素融合以获得130个整合特征。一个堆叠式机器学习分类器以逻辑回归和XGBoost作为基学习器、支持向量机作为元学习器,生成了校准后的恶性概率。主要性能指标是独立验证队列中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC);次要指标包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。我们通过DeLong检验(双侧alpha = .05)比较AUC。 结果:共纳入324例患者。在验证队列中,临床模型的AUC为0.72(95% CI,0.63-0.80;敏感性71.9%;特异性73.9%;PPV 87.2%;NPV 51.5%)。影像组学模型的AUC为0.80(95% CI,0.67-0.90;敏感性78.9%;特异性73.9%;PPV 88.2%;NPV 58.6%)。甲基化模型表现更佳,AUC为0.95(95% CI,0.91-1.00;敏感性78.9%;特异性100.0%;PPV 100.0%;NPV 65.7%)。多组学模型显示出最高的判别能力,AUC为0.99(95% CI,0.98-1.00),敏感性87.7%,特异性100.0%,PPV 100.0%,NPV 76.7%。DeLong检验显示,多组学模型显著优于临床模型(p<0.05)和影像组学模型(p<0.01);与甲基化模型的差异无统计学意义(p=0.076),表明ctDNA甲基化提供了主导性的诊断信号,而多模态融合进一步增强了该信号。 结论:在这项前瞻性双中心研究中,一个多组学机器学习模型准确地区分了恶性与良性的纯实性肺结节(≤3 cm)。该模型在独立验证队列中实现了近乎完美的特异性和高敏感性,其中ctDNA甲基化贡献了最大的单模态信号。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Early,noninvasively and accurate differentiation of malignant from benign solid pulmonary nodules is essential to avoid both overtreatment and delayed intervention. We aimed to develop a clinically translatable multi‑omics model that integrates plasma ctDNA methylation, CT radiomics, and routine clinical data to improve preoperative diagnosis of indeterminate pure solid pulmonary nodules ≤3 cm. Methods: In a prospective two‑center study, we consecutively enrolled adults with indeterminate pure solid pulmonary nodules (≤3 cm) scheduled for surgical resection. Patients were allocated by enrollment time into a modeling cohort and an independent validation cohort (7:3). We built three single‑modality models (clinical, radiomics, methylation) and a fused multi‑omics model. We standardized features within each modality, removed low‑variance and low‑relevance features, and then applied Elastic Net and SHAP‑based ranking, followed by dimensionality reduction and element‑wise fusion to obtain 130 integrated features. A stacked machine‑learning classifier, using logistic regression and XGBoost as base learners and a support vector machine as the meta‑learner, generated calibrated malignancy probabilities. The primary performance metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the independent validation cohort; secondary metrics included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). We compared AUCs by DeLong test (two‑sided alpha = .05). Results: A total of 324 patients were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80; sensitivity, 71.9%; specificity, 73.9%; PPV, 87.2%; NPV, 51.5%). The radiomics model yielded an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90; sensitivity, 78.9%; specificity, 73.9%; PPV, 88.2%; NPV, 58.6%). The methylation model performed better, with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-1.00; sensitivity, 78.9%; specificity, 100.0%; PPV, 100.0%; NPV, 65.7%). The multi‑omics model showed the highest discrimination, with an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), sensitivity of 87.7%, specificity of 100.0%, PPV of 100.0%, and NPV of 76.7%. DeLong tests showed that the multi‑omics model significantly outperformed the clinical (p<0.05) and radiomics (p<0.01) models; the difference versus the methylation model was not statistically significant (p =0.076), indicating that ctDNA methylation provided the dominant diagnostic signal, which multimodal fusion further enhanced. Conclusions: In this prospective two‑center study, a multi‑omics machine‑learning model accurately distinguished malignant from benign pure solid pulmonary nodules ≤3 cm. The model achieved near‑perfect specificity and high sensitivity in an independent validation cohort, with ctDNA methylation contributing the largest single‑modality signal.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. Bai, None.. L. Shen, None.. S. Ma, None.. S. Gao, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索