PO.MCB06.03 · 分子与细胞生物学

TAPS+ 的效用:一种用于高保真表观遗传分析的阳性读出甲基化测序方法

Utility of TAPS+: a positive-readout methylation sequencing approach for high-fidelity epigenetic profiling

海报缩略图:TAPS+ 的效用:一种用于高保真表观遗传分析的阳性读出甲基化测序方法
编号 3213 展板 23 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 20 主讲 Kimberly Holden, BS;MS
分会场 Epigenetic Changes as Molecular Markers of Cancer
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Kimberly A. Holden1, Kerry D. Fitzgerald1, Adib Shafi1, Ashraf Shabaneh1, Dennis D. Krutkin1, Tong Liu1, Eyad Almasri1, Graham McLennan1, Nathan Faulkner1, Craig Marshall2, Travis Sanders2, Thomas Harrison2, Eduard Casas2, Kristina Giorda2, Doug Wendel2, Brian Kudlow2, Shakti Ramkissoon3, Marcia Eisenberg3, Brian Caveney3, Eric Severson3, Taylor J. Jensen3, Jonathan Williams1

1Labcorp, San Diego, CA,2Watchmaker Genomics, Boulder, CO,3Labcorp, Durham, NC

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
由于 DNA 损伤性化学处理会降低序列多样性,从临床样本进行准确的甲基化测序具有挑战性,这限制了数据质量和可重复性——尤其是对于片段化或低输入量的材料如 cfDNA。本研究的目的是在临床相关队列中评估一种新的阳性读出甲基化方法(TAPS+),并将其性能与采用阴性读出方法的酶促甲基化转换方法进行比较。TAPS+ 是一种非损伤性化学方法,将甲基化胞嘧啶转换为胸腺嘧啶,同时保留未甲基化胞嘧啶,维持完整的序列复杂度并实现直接甲基化检测。该方法应用于一个 24 样本队列,包括浸润性乳腺癌患者、健康供者和涵盖一系列甲基化状态的对照样本。文库与来自酶促阴性读出方法的文库并行测序,以评估转换效率、背景以及差异甲基化区域(DMR)的生物学一致性。使用 R 软件包 methylKit 进行 DMR 分析,并基于注释基因组区域内具有统计学意义的甲基化差异鉴定生物标志物候选。与阴性读出方法相比,TAPS+ 在所有样本类型中实现了更短的周转时间和更高的文库产量。在 cfDNA 样本中,TAPS+ 产生的甲基化比率显著高于阴性读出方法(p = 8.6e-10)。一个甲基化对照使用 TAPS+ 显示 88.8% 的 5mC 率,而阴性读出方法为 76.8%,提示更高的准确性。CpG 岛甲基化在两种方法间高度相关,尽管阴性读出方法在低覆盖度位点噪声更大。乳腺癌患者和健康个体在转录起始位点周围均表现出平均 DNA 甲基化水平的特征性下降,与启动子低甲基化一致,两组间未观察到显著差异。使用 TAPS+ 的 DMR 分析鉴定出显著的生物标志物候选,包括与癌症发生和进展相关的 SHH 高甲基化(q = 3.15e-5)。其他生物标志物与发育通路、癌症信号传导、转录调控和免疫反应相关。阴性读出数据集未显示出提示疾病状态的强生物标志物候选。TAPS+ 能够从多样且具挑战性的临床材料中实现高保真甲基化测序,在简化的工作流程内支持稳健的表观遗传分析。与酶促阴性读出方法相比,阳性读出方法展示了更优的数据质量和生物学相关性,凸显了其在转化研究、早期检测和临床检测开发中的潜在效用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Accurate methylation sequencing from clinical samples is challenging due to DNA-damaging chemistries that reduce sequence diversity, limiting data quality and reproducibility-particularly for fragmented or low-input materials such as cfDNA. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new positive-readout methylation method (TAPS+) in a clinically relevant cohort and compare its performance to an enzymatic methylation conversion method employing a negative-readout approach. TAPS+ is a non-damaging chemistry that converts methylated cytosines to thymines while preserving unmethylated cytosines, maintaining full sequence complexity and enabling direct methylation detection. This method was applied to a 24-sample cohort comprising invasive breast carcinoma patients, healthy donors, and control samples spanning a range of methylation states. Libraries were sequenced in parallel with those from an enzymatic negative-readout method to assess conversion efficiency, background, and biological concordance of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). The R package methylKit was used for DMR analysis, and biomarker candidates were identified based on statistically significant methylation differences within annotated genomic regions. Compared to the negative-readout method, TAPS+ achieved a shorter turnaround time and higher library yields across all sample types. In cfDNA samples, TAPS+ produced significantly higher methylation ratios than the negative-readout method (p = 8.6e-10). A methylated control showed an 88.8% 5mC rate with TAPS+, versus 76.8% with the negative-readout method, suggesting greater accuracy. CpG island methylation was strongly correlated across methods, though the negative-readout method had greater noise at low coverage sites. Both breast cancer patients and healthy individuals exhibited a characteristic dip in average DNA methylation levels around transcription start sites, consistent with promoter hypomethylation, with no significant differences observed between cohorts. DMR analysis with TAPS+ identified significant biomarker candidates, including SHH hypermethylation (q = 3.15e-5), associated with cancer development and progression. Additional biomarkers were associated with developmental pathways, cancer signaling, transcriptional regulation, and immune response. The negative-readout dataset did not demonstrate strong biomarker candidates indicative of disease status. TAPS+ enables high-fidelity methylation sequencing from diverse and challenging clinical materials, supporting robust epigenetic analysis within a streamlined workflow. The positive-readout approach demonstrated superior data quality and biological relevance compared to an enzymatic negative-readout method, highlighting its potential utility for translational research, early detection, and clinical assay development.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. A. Holden, Labcorp Employment, Stock. K. D. Fitzgerald, Labcorp Employment, Stock. A. Shafi, Labcorp Employment, Stock. A. Shabaneh, Labcorp Employment, Stock. D. D. Krutkin, Labcorp Employment, Stock. T. Liu, Labcorp Employment, Stock. E. Almasri, Labcorp Employment, Stock. G. McLennan, Labcorp Employment, Stock. N. Faulkner, Labcorp Employment, Stock. C. Marshall, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. T. Sanders, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. T. Harrison, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. E. Casas, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. K. Giorda, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. D. Wendel, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. B. Kudlow, Watchmaker Genomics Employment, Stock. S. Ramkissoon, Labcorp Employment, Stock. M. Eisenberg, Labcorp Employment, Stock. B. Caveney, Labcorp Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option. E. Severson, Labcorp Employment, Stock. T. J. Jensen, Labcorp Employment, Stock. J. Williams, Labcorp Employment, Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索