PO.PR01.04 · 预防研究
长期跑步与结直肠腺瘤及癌症的风险
Long-term running and risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:尽管体力活动与较低的结直肠癌风险相关,但有假说认为高水平的长距离跑步可能诱发胃肠道缺血和损伤,从而引发对结直肠癌变风险潜在增高的担忧。目前仅有一项纳入100名参与者的小型横断面研究提示,高强度长距离跑步是进展期结肠腺瘤的危险因素。尚无大型前瞻性研究全面评估长期跑步与结直肠腺瘤及癌症风险之间的关系。
方法:我们使用了三项前瞻性队列的数据:卫生专业人员随访研究(Health Professionals Follow-up Study)、护士健康研究(Nurses' Health Study, NHS)和NHSII。跑步情况通过每两年一次的经验证问卷进行评估,并计算为过去8年期间的累积平均值,以反映长期模式。在160,367名随访期间至少接受过一次下消化道内镜检查的参与者中,采用考虑重复观测的logistic回归模型评估结直肠腺瘤风险。在238,491名随访长达32年的参与者中,采用Cox比例风险模型分析结直肠癌风险。多变量模型对潜在混杂因素以及除跑步以外的总体力活动进行了校正。我们还检验了跑步与静息心率及心血管代谢生物标志物之间的关联。
结果:在随访期间,我们记录了12,426例传统腺瘤、11,251例锯齿状息肉和3583例结直肠癌。跑步与传统腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的风险呈负相关。对于高危腺瘤,与报告不跑步的参与者相比,跑步>0-<1、1-<2、2-<3、3-<4和≥4 h/周的OR(95% CI)分别为0.86(0.76-0.98)、0.75(0.55-1.00)、0.83(0.56-1.23)、0.94(0.52-1.66)和0.51(0.29-0.91)。对于结直肠癌,与不跑步相比,跑步>0-<1 h/周的HR(95% CI)为0.86(0.76-0.97),1-<2 h/周为0.60(0.41-0.87),≥2 h/周为0.81(0.58-1.12)。在进一步校正体重指数后,结果保持相似。生物标志物分析显示,较高水平的跑步与显著较低的静息心率、较低的炎症状态(较低的CRP和IL-6)、较好的胰岛素状态(较低的C肽)和血脂谱(较高的HDL胆固醇和较低的甘油三酯)相关,为我们对跑步的评估提供了生物学支持。
结论:在三项大型队列中,长期跑步与结直肠腺瘤、锯齿状息肉或结直肠癌风险的增加均无关联。中等水平的跑步(约至多2 h/周)与较低的结直肠癌风险相关,而≥4 h/周的水平与较低的高危腺瘤风险相关。这些发现令人放心地表明,习惯性跑步(至少达到4 h/周的水平)在结直肠肿瘤风险方面是安全的,并可能具有潜在益处。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Although physical activity is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer, it was hypothesized that high levels of long-distance running may induce gastrointestinal ischemia and injury, raising concern about potential increased risk of colorectal carcinogenesis. Currently only a small cross-sectional study of 100 participants suggested intensive long-distance running is a risk factor for advanced colon adenomas. No large prospective study has comprehensively evaluated long-term running in relation to risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer.
Methods: We used data from three prospective cohorts: Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and NHSII. Running was assessed with biennial validated questionnaires and calculated as cumulative average over the past 8-year period to reflect long-term patterns. Colorectal adenoma risk was evaluated among 160,367 participants with at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during follow-up with logistic regression models accounting for repeated observations. Colorectal cancer risk was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models among 238,491 participants followed up to 32 years. Multivariable models were adjusted for potential confounders and total physical activity other than running. We also examined associations between running with resting heart rate and cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Results: We documented 12,426 conventional adenomas, 11,251 serrated polyps, and 3583 colorectal cancers during the follow-up period. Running was inversely associated with risk of conventional adenoma and serrated polyps. For high-risk adenoma, compared to participants who reported no running, the ORs (95% CIs) across >0-<1, 1-<2, 2-<3, 3-<4, and ≥4 h/week of running were 0.86 (0.76-0.98), 0.75 (0.55-1.00), 0.83 (0.56-1.23), 0.94 (0.52-1.66), and 0.51 (0.29-0.91), respectively. For colorectal cancer, compared to no running, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.86 (0.76-0.97) for >0-<1 h/week, 0.60 (0.41-0.87) for 1-<2 h/week, and 0.81 (0.58-1.12) for ≥2 h/week. Results remained similar when further adjusted for body mass index. Biomarker analysis showed higher levels of running were associated with significant lower resting heart rate, lower inflammation status (lower CRP and IL-6), better insulinemic (lower C-peptide) and lipid profile (higher HDL-cholesterol and lower triglycerides), providing biologic support of our assessment of running.
Conclusion: In three large cohorts, long-term running was not associated with an increased risk of colorectal adenoma, serrated polyps, or colorectal cancer. Moderate running levels (approximately up to 2 h/week) were associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer and levels ≥4 h/week were associated with a lower risk of high-risk adenoma. These findings provide reassurance that habitual running, at levels up to at least 4 h/week, is safe and potentially beneficial with respect to colorectal neoplasia risk.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Zhang, None.