PO.PR01.04 · 预防研究

评估一项临床整合的移动健康干预以减少维持治疗期间ALL青少年和年轻成人久坐时间

Evaluation of a clinically integrated mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary time in adolescents and young adults with ALL during maintenance therapy

编号 3636 展板 22 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 36 主讲 Brittany Ivory, MD;MPH
分会场 Metabolism and Microbiome in Cancer Initiation and Prevention
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Brittany J. Ivory1, Yueh-Yun Chi1, Jeannie M. Shin1, Britni R. Belcher2, David R. Freyer1

1Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,2Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:久坐行为(SB)在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)治疗期间的早期青少年和年轻成人(eAYAs,12-21岁)中普遍存在,并会导致心血管代谢并发症。治疗期间的干预可能具有挑战性,但随着强化治疗毒性的消退以及每月就诊便于定期研究接触,维持期可能是SB干预的适宜时机。 目的:评估在ALL维持期eAYAs中开展临床整合的多组分移动健康(mHealth)SB干预的可行性和可接受性;并评估其对SB和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。 方法:这项正在进行的为期12周的单臂初步试验包括一个带有久坐触发提示的Fitbit、三次诊所或虚拟辅导课程,以及一个基于应用程序的同伴聊天群组。干预与一个12周的维持治疗周期相一致,面对面程序与每月诊所就诊同步。可行性定义为保留率≥70%、招募N=20名,以及≥50%的样本在≥70%的天数中Fitbit佩戴时间≥10小时/天。可接受性通过退出调查评估。在基线和第12周,使用activPAL micro4设备和IPAQ问卷评估SB,通过经过验证的调查评估HRQoL。按入组时已完成的维持周期数比较结局差异(≤2[早期]对比>2[晚期])。 结果:迄今为止,N=20名已入组,N=16名已完成研究(中位年龄=16.2岁;69%为男性;69%为西班牙裔;中位BMI=23.3 kg/m²;56%处于早期维持)。完成者中的保留率为94%(N=15),38%(N=6)达到Fitbit佩戴时间标准,其中大多数处于早期维持(83%[N=5]对比晚期维持14%[N=1])。可接受性高:93%(N=14)报告该干预有助于减少SB,100%会向同伴推荐。与晚期维持相比,早期维持中有更高比例的参与者强烈同意该干预减少了SB(有帮助:88%对比29%,p=0.05;推荐:88%对比0%;p=0.001)。总体而言,设备测量的久坐和坐姿时间减少(分别为−10.4分钟/天和−26.3分钟/天),步数增加(+1,993步/天)(均p>0.05);自我报告的坐姿时间也减少(−154分钟/天,p=0.002)。早期维持的参与者显示出与晚期周期相似的趋势。HRQoL无显著变化。 结论:初步发现表明,这项mHealth SB干预是可行、可接受的,并可在ALL的eAYAs积极维持治疗期间进行临床整合。早期维持的参与者显示出高依从性和参与度,提示在ALL积极治疗期间开展SB干预的可行性和益处,以及推广至其他类型癌症的潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Sedentary behavior (SB) is prevalent in early adolescents and young adults (eAYAs, 12-21 years) during acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment and contributes to cardiometabolic complications. Intervention during therapy can be challenging, but the maintenance phase may be opportune for SB intervention as toxicity from intensive therapy subsides and monthly visits allow for regular study contact. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a clinically integrated, multi-component mobile health (mHealth) SB intervention in eAYAs during ALL maintenance phase; and assess effects on SB and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This ongoing 12-week, single-arm pilot trial includes a Fitbit with inactivity-triggered prompts, three in-clinic or virtual coaching sessions, and an app-based peer chat group. The intervention is aligned with one 12-week cycle of maintenance therapy, and in-person procedures coincide with monthly clinic visits. Feasibility is defined as ≥70% retention, N=20 enrolled, and Fitbit wear time ≥10 h/day on ≥70% days for ≥50% of sample. Acceptability is evaluated via exit surveys. At baseline and week 12, SB is assessed using the activPAL micro4 device and IPAQ questionnaire, and HRQoL is assessed via validated surveys. Outcome differences were compared by number of maintenance cycles completed at enrollment (≤ 2 [early] vs > 2 [late]). Results: To date, N=20 are enrolled and N=16 have completed the study (median age=16.2 yrs; 69% male; 69% Hispanic; median BMI=23.3kg/m 2 ; 56% in early maintenance). Retention among completers is 94% (N=15) and 38% (N=6) met Fitbit wear time criteria, the majority of whom were in early maintenance (83% [N = 5] vs 14% [N = 1] in late maintenance). Acceptability is high: 93% (N=14) reported the intervention helped reduce SB and 100% would recommend it to peers. A greater proportion of participants in early vs late maintenance strongly agreed the intervention reduced SB (helpful: 88% vs 29%, p = 0.05; recommend: 88% vs 0%; p = 0.001). Overall, device-measured sedentary and sitting time decreased (−10.4 min/day and −26.3 min/day, respectively) and steps increased (+1,993/day) (all p>0.05); self-reported sitting time also decreased (−154 min/day, p=0.002). Participants in early maintenance showed similar trends to those in later cycles. There were no significant changes in HRQoL. Conclusions: Preliminary findings indicate this mHealth SB intervention is feasible, acceptable, and can be clinically integrated during active maintenance therapy for eAYAs with ALL. Participants in early maintenance showed high adherence and engagement, suggesting the feasibility and benefit of SB intervention during active treatment for ALL and potential scalability to other types of cancer.
利益披露 Disclosure
B. J. Ivory, None.. Y. Chi, None.. J. M. Shin, None.. B. R. Belcher, None.. D. R. Freyer, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索