PO.PS01.07 · 人群科学

在一个奠基者人群中BRCA1/2突变及多基因风险评分与前列腺癌风险和死亡率的关联

Associations of BRCA1/2 mutations and polygenic risk score with prostate cancer risk and mortality in a founder population

编号 3593 展板 11 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 35 主讲 Ilir Agalliu, MD;ScD
分会场 Genetic Epidemiology 1: GxE, GWAS, Polygenic Risk Scores, and Post-GWAS
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ilir Agalliu1, Mykhaylo Usyk2, Michael D`Angelo2, Victor Kamensky1, Robert Burk2

1Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY,2Microbiology and Immunology, Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:前列腺癌(PrCa)是最常见的实体肿瘤,也是美国男性癌症死亡的第二大原因。尽管该癌症的多因素病因表明涉及多条生物学通路,但迄今为止,罕见变异与常见遗传变异(SNP)在预测更具侵袭性或致死性PrCa风险中的作用仍不明确。本项目的目标是在一个奠基者人群中,考察罕见的胚系BRCA1/2突变和多基因风险评分(PRS)与总体及侵袭性PrCa风险以及总体死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率之间的关联。 方法:本分析使用了来自943例PrCa病例和1,199例阿什肯纳兹犹太裔对照的流行病学和胚系基因型数据。我们分别采用logistic回归和多项回归模型,评估BRCA1(185delAG)和BRCA2(6174delT)奠基者突变以及由77个SNP生成的PRS与总体PrCa和高级别癌症(定义为Gleason评分7-10)风险的关联,并对年龄和PrCa家族史进行校正。所有男性自纳入研究时(1999年至2003年间)起,通过与美国国家死亡指数的链接随访至2022年12月31日以观察死亡情况。在对年龄、Charlson合并症指数以及临床因素和PrCa治疗进行校正后,采用Cox回归模型和竞争风险分析来考察BRCA1/2突变和PRS与总体死亡率及PrCa特异性死亡率的关联。 结果:BRCA1(185delAG:1.2%对0.7%)和BRCA2(6174delT:1.3%对0.9%)的患病率在病例中高于对照。携带BRCA1或BRCA2突变者与非突变携带者相比,总体PrCa的OR为1.92(95%CI 1.00-3.67),高级别PrCa的OR为3.38(95%CI 1.63-7.04)。PRS评分也独立地与总体PrCa和侵袭性癌症风险升高2.2至2.3倍呈统计学显著相关。在中位随访19.7年期间,943例确诊PrCa的男性中共有712例(76%)死亡,其中124例(17.4%)为PrCa特异性死亡。BRCA2突变携带者与非突变携带者相比,总体死亡率和PrCa特异性死亡率的风险比(HR)分别为1.92(p=0.008)和2.88(p=0.01)。然而,PRS评分与PrCa特异性死亡率无关联(HR=0.98,p=0.89),与总体死亡率呈边界显著的9%较低风险(HR=0.91,p=0.05)。 结论:BRCA1突变、尤其是BRCA2突变的携带者发生更具侵袭性和致死性PrCa的风险增加。尽管PRS评分与总体风险相关,但其并未赋予更高Gleason评分肿瘤或致死性PrCa的升高风险。评估BRCA2突变可能有助于对男性进行PrCa筛查的风险分层,并可能有助于靶向治疗。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction : Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the most common solid tumor and the second-leading cause of cancer deaths among U.S. men. Although the multi-factorial etiology of this cancer indicates the involvement of several biological pathways, to date the role of rare vs common genetic variants (SNPs) in risk prediction of more aggressive or fatal PrCa remains unclear. The goal of this project is to examine the associations of rare germline BRCA1/2 mutations and a polygenic risk score (PRS) with risks of total and aggressive PrCa as well as with overall and cancer-specific mortality in a founder population. Methods : Epidemiological and germline genotype data collected from 943 PrCa cases and 1,199 controls of Ashkenazim Jewish descent were used in this analysis. We evaluated associations of BRCA1 (185delAG) and BRCA2 (6174delT) founder mutations and a PRS generated from 77 SNPs with risks of total PrCa and high-grade cancer (defined as Gleason score 7-10) using logistic and multinomial regression models, respectively, and adjusted for age and family history of PrCa. All men were followed for mortality via linkage with the U.S. National Death Index from recruitment into the study (between 1999 and 2003) through 12/31/2022. Cox regression models and competing risk analyses were used to examine associations of BRCA1/2 mutations and PRS with overall and PrCa-specific mortality after adjustment for age, Charlson comorbidity index as well as clinical factors and PrCa treatment. Results : The prevalence of BRCA1 (185delAG: 1.2% vs 0.7% ) and BRCA2 (6174delT: 1.3% vs 0.9% ) were higher in cases vs controls. Mutation carriers of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations had ORs of 1.92 (95%CI 1.00-3.67) for total PrCa and 3.38 (95%CI 1.63-7.04) for high-grade PrCa compared to non-mutation carriers. The PRS score was also independently associated with a statistically significant 2.2 to 2.3-fold higher risk for total PrCa and aggressive cancer. During a median follow-up of 19.7 years a total of 712 out of 943 (76%) men diagnosed with PrCa had died, of whom 124 (17.4%) were PrCa-specific deaths. BRCA2 mutation carriers had hazard ratios (HR) of 1.92 (p=0.008) and 2.88 (p=0.01) for overall and PrCa-specific mortality compared to non-mutation carriers. However, there was no association of the PRS score with PrCa-specific mortality (HR=0.98, p=0.89) and a borderline significant 9% lower risk (HR=0.91, p=0.05) with overall mortality. Conclusion : Carriers of BRCA1 and particularly BRCA2 mutations have increased risks of more aggressive and fatal PrCa. Although the PRS score was associated with overall risk, it did not confer any elevated risk for higher Gleason score tumors or fatal PrCa. Evaluation for BRCA2 mutations might be helpful for risk-stratification of men for PrCa screening and potentially targeted therapy.
利益披露 Disclosure
I. Agalliu, None.. M. Usyk, None.. M. D`Angelo, None.. V. Kamensky, None.. R. Burk, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索