PO.TB04.07 · 肿瘤生物学

利用PDX来源的胶质母细胞瘤微环境构建多细胞血脑屏障模型:比较人源与鼠源生物芯片系统在肿瘤异质性和药物反应方面的表现

Modeling the multicellular blood-brain barrier with a PDX-derived glioblastoma microenvironment: comparing human and mouse biochip systems for tumor heterogeneity and drug response

海报缩略图:利用PDX来源的胶质母细胞瘤微环境构建多细胞血脑屏障模型:比较人源与鼠源生物芯片系统在肿瘤异质性和药物反应方面的表现
编号 3401 展板 6 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 28 主讲 Amélie Paillereau
分会场 In Vitro Models 1: 2D and 3D
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Michelle Zimmer1, Amélie Paillereau2, Thomas Sommermann2, Lars Winkler1, Joshua Alcaniz1, Jens Hoffmann1, Knut Rennert2

1Experimental Pharmacology and Oncology Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany,2Dynamic42 GmbH, Jena, Germany

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种高度恶性的原发性脑肿瘤,其治疗管理因其侵袭性行为和血脑屏障(BBB)的限制性特征而受到阻碍。BBB严格调控循环系统与脑之间的分子转运,限制了治疗药物的渗透。广泛使用的二维(2D)体外系统预测价值有限,因为它们缺乏诸如屏障完整性、多细胞复杂性和流动依赖性影响等关键生理特征。由于治疗疗效同时取决于BBB通透性和肿瘤的直接反应,因此亟需能够更准确重现BBB功能的先进体外平台,以支持更可靠的临床前评估。为构建一个具有生理相关性的BBB模型,我们将鼠源或人源脑毛细血管内皮细胞与原代星形胶质细胞和周细胞组装在一起,并在静态Transwell系统和微流控芯片平台中检测其屏障形成情况。我们比较了不同组合和来源的BBB构建细胞在连接组织结构和屏障紧密性方面的差异。流动的加入通过剪切依赖性的连接重塑进一步增强了屏障结构。随后,这些人源和鼠源BBB芯片模型与患者来源异种移植(PDX)GBM细胞系相结合,生成了一组鼠源PDX/GBM芯片和人源GBM芯片模型,可在人源或鼠源屏障下评估肿瘤异质性。首先,我们比较了传统2D培养、静态BBB构建体、基于流动的微流控模型以及体内实验之间的治疗反应。尽管2D和体内研究显示对cobimetinib敏感,但该化合物在整合流动的BBB芯片中无法有效抑制生长。这与其无法穿透完整屏障的特性相一致。相反,可穿透BBB的药物afatinib在体内和生物芯片中均有效降低了GBM的生长,表明该芯片能可靠地反映治疗活性是否依赖于BBB穿透。总之,GBM芯片系统将关键的血管屏障特征与GBM共培养结合起来,提供了一个转化框架,用于研究肿瘤-屏障动态并确定化合物穿越BBB的能力,从而更有效地将体外实验与PDX及人体结果联系起来。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor whose therapeutic management is hindered by its invasive behavior and the restrictive properties of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB tightly regulates molecular transport between the circulatory system and the brain, limiting penetration of therapeutic agents. Widely used 2D in vitro systems offer little predictive value, as they lack key physiological features such as barrier integrity, multicellular complexity, and flow-dependent influences. As treatment efficacy depends on both, BBB permeability and direct tumor response, there is a critical need for advanced in vitro platforms that more accurately reproduce BBB function to support more reliable preclinical evaluation. To build a physiologically relevant BBB model, we assembled mouse or human brain capillary endothelial cells together with primary astrocytes and pericytes and tested their barrier formation both in static transwell systems and in a microfluidic chip platform. Different combinations and sources of BBB building cells were compared for junctional organization and barrier tightness. The addition of flow further reinforced barrier structure through shear-dependent junctional remodeling. These human and mouse BBB-on-chip models were then combined with patient-derived xenograft (PDX) GBM cell lines, generating a set of mouse PDX/GBM-on-chip and human GBM-on-chip models, that allow evaluation of tumor-heterogeneity under a human or mouse barrier. Initially, we compared treatment responses across conventional 2D cultures, static BBB constructs, the flow-based microfluidic model, and in vivo assays. Although 2D and in vivo studies demonstrated sensitivity towards cobimetinib, the compound was ineffective at inhibiting growth in the flow-integrated BBB chip. This is consistent with its inability to penetrate an intact barrier. In contrast, the BBB-permeable agent afatinib effectively reduced GBM growth in vivo and within the biochip, indicating that the chip reliably reflects whether therapeutic activity depends on BBB penetration. In summary, GBM-on-chip systems unite critical vascular barrier characteristics with GBM co-culture, offering a translational framework to examine tumor-barrier dynamics and determine compound passage across the BBB, thus more effectively connecting in vitro assays with PDX and human outcomes.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Zimmer, None.. A. Paillereau, None.. T. Sommermann, None.. L. Winkler, None.. J. Alcaniz, None.. K. Rennert, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索