PO.TB09.02 · 肿瘤生物学

结构变异塑造儿童癌症中的克隆演化

Structural variation shapes clonal evolution in pediatric cancer

海报缩略图:结构变异塑造儿童癌症中的克隆演化
编号 3525 展板 1 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 33 主讲 Robert Greenhalgh, BS;PhD
分会场 Tumor Evolution
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Robert Greenhalgh1, Bensheng Ju1, Samuel W. Brady2, John Easton1, Sivaraman Natarajan1, Jinghui Zhang1

1Computational Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN,2Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
肿瘤克隆演化由在治疗干预压力下赋予优势的突变的选择或获得所驱动。关于克隆演化轨迹的大部分知识基于单核苷酸变异(SNV),这是一种非常适合通过深度测序检测亚克隆并估计其癌细胞分数的突变类型。为了探索结构变异(SV)在演化过程中的作用,我们分析了13例具有多个时空上不同的肿瘤样本和患者来源异种移植(PDX)的儿童癌症患者,这些样本通过全基因组测序(WGS)进行了分析。除了从头(de novo)SV检出之外,还通过Fuzzion2分析了同一患者所有肿瘤样本中SV的存在情况,该方法利用模式匹配以低至单个读对的灵敏度发现SV。我们发现,由SV定义的克隆结构在很大程度上与SNV所定义的结构一致,尽管如果SV的形成不受治疗相关诱变(如顺铂)的影响,分支长度可能有所不同。基于SV的突变过程,如白血病中RAG介导的重组,可从诊断到复发持续活跃,而染色体碎裂(chromothripsis)导致的复杂SV尽管在诊断时占主导地位,却可能未被选择。一组诊断-复发横纹肌肉瘤样本表现出一种有趣的模式,即共享一个MDM2的祖先染色体外扩增子,该扩增子与诊断和复发时各自不同的第二个扩增子共存。RNA测序证实每个扩增子导致不同基因子集的过表达,而由WGS得出的SV表明,复发特有的扩增子可能与祖先MDM2扩增子发生了融合。这一发现的验证目前正在进行中,利用长读长测序和源自这些肿瘤PDX模型的细胞。我们的研究强调了检查SV的重要性,以便获得关于治疗过程中影响驱动基因和扩增子结构的动态变化的视角,并可能为克服治疗耐药性的策略提供新见解。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Tumor clonal evolution is driven by the selection or acquisition of mutations that confer an advantage under the pressures of therapeutic intervention. Much of the knowledge of clonal evolutionary trajectories is based upon single nucleotide variants (SNVs), a mutation type well-suited for detecting subclones and estimating their cancer cell fraction by deep sequencing. To explore the role of structural variants (SVs) in the evolutionary process, we analyzed 13 pediatric cancer patients with multiple spatiotemporally distinct tumor samples and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) profiled by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In addition to de novo SV calling, the SV presence across all tumor samples from the same patient was analyzed by Fuzzion2, which uses pattern matching to find SVs at a sensitivity as low as a single read pair. We found that clonal architectures defined by SVs largely mirrored those of SNVs, although the branch lengths could differ if SV formation was not affected by therapy-related mutagenesis (e.g. cisplatin). SV-based mutational processes, such as RAG-mediated recombination in leukemia, can be active from diagnosis to relapse, and complex SVs caused by chromothripsis may not be selected for despite their predominant presence at diagnosis. A trio of diagnosis-relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma samples exhibited an intriguing pattern of sharing an ancestral extrachromosomal amplicon of MDM2 , which co-existed with a second amplicon distinct at diagnosis and relapse. RNA sequencing confirmed each amplicon led to overexpression of different subsets of genes, and SVs derived from WGS indicated that the amplicon private to relapse may have merged with the ancestral MDM2 amplicon. Validation of this finding is currently underway, leveraging long-read sequencing and cells derived from PDX models of these tumors. Our study emphasizes the importance of examining SVs to gain perspective on the dynamic changes that impact driver genes and amplicon architecture during therapy and may offer new insights on strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance.
利益披露 Disclosure
R. Greenhalgh, None.. B. Ju, None.. S. W. Brady, None.. J. Easton, None.. S. Natarajan, None.. J. Zhang, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索