PO.TB10.03 · 肿瘤生物学

靶向CD44-SPP1轴以克服膀胱癌的治疗耐药

Targeting the CD44-SPP1 axis to overcome therapy resistance in bladder cancer

海报缩略图:靶向CD44-SPP1轴以克服膀胱癌的治疗耐药
编号 3458 展板 30 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 29 主讲 Hiba Siddiqui, BS
分会场 Microenvironmental Determinants of Therapy Response and Resistance 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Hiba Siddiqui1, Yuzhen Zhou1, Jihyun Lee2, Kevin Bi3, Jacqueline T. Ochoa3, Martin Egger1, Eliezer M. Van Allen1, Filipe L. De Carvalho2, Kent W. Mouw1

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA,3Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:以顺铂为基础的化疗仍是肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的主要治疗手段,而近期批准的抗体药物偶联物(ADCs)恩诺单抗(enfortumab vedotin,EV)联合帕博利珠单抗(P)作为一线治疗,扩展了治疗选择。然而,对这些治疗的原发性无应答和获得性耐药导致了不良的临床结局。肿瘤细胞与肿瘤微环境(TME)相互作用,其中肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)占非肿瘤细胞的50-80%,可促进免疫抑制性TME,从而驱动治疗耐药。然而,在以顺铂和EV为基础的治疗背景下,肿瘤-巨噬细胞串扰的潜在机制仍未充分明确。 方法:我们采用snRNA-seq分析人类样本,并与公开可用的数据集进行联合分析。使用空间转录组学表征TAM亚型的分布。使用CRISPR-Cas9生成CD44缺陷型膀胱癌细胞系和SPP1缺陷型巨噬细胞。在顺铂和MMAE治疗条件下进行了一系列体外功能实验,包括基于流式细胞术的巨噬细胞表型分析、吞噬实验、免疫印迹和活力实验。使用直接和间接共培养系统模拟肿瘤细胞-巨噬细胞相互作用。使用免疫健全的小鼠膀胱癌模型评估CD44-SPP1阻断与顺铂或EV联合时的治疗应答。进行RNA测序以分析CD44-SPP1轴调控后肿瘤细胞和巨噬细胞的基因表达变化。 结果:肿瘤细胞CD44表达和巨噬细胞SPP1表达与膀胱癌患者的顺铂耐药和不良临床结局呈正相关。在耐药肿瘤中,表达SPP1的巨噬细胞在空间上定位于CD44阳性肿瘤细胞附近。顺铂和EV治疗分别增加了肿瘤细胞和巨噬细胞中的CD44和SPP1表达,且重组SPP1足以诱导肿瘤细胞CD44表达。CD44缺失增强了肿瘤细胞对顺铂和EV的应答,流式细胞术和免疫印迹显示SPP1缺陷型巨噬细胞表现出改变的极化状态和增强的吞噬潜能。CD44表达型肿瘤细胞与SPP1缺陷型巨噬细胞共同植入减少了肿瘤生长。在各种遗传和治疗条件下对TME变化的全面免疫分析正在进行中。 结论:破坏CD44-SPP1相互作用使膀胱肿瘤对顺铂和EV敏感。通过界定CD44-SPP1轴内巨噬细胞的表型和极化状态,这项工作支持诸如基于工程化巨噬细胞的免疫疗法等治疗方法,以克服MIBC中的治疗耐药。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains a mainstay of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and the recent approval of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enfortumab vedotin (EV) combined with pembrolizumab (P) as the first-line treatment has expanded therapeutic options. However, primary non-response and acquired resistance to these treatments result in poor clinical outcomes. Tumor cells interact with the tumor microenvironment (TME), where tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) comprise 50-80% of non-tumors cells and can promote an immunosuppresive TME that drives therapeutic resistance. However, the mechanisms underlying tumor-macrophage crosstalk in cisplatin- and EV-based therapeutic settings remain poorly defined. Methods: We employed snRNA-seq to analyze human samples and performed combined analyses with publicly available datasets. Spatial transcriptomics were used to characterize the distribution of TAM subtypes. CRISPR-Cas9 was used to generate CD44-deficient bladder cancer cell lines and SPP1-deficient macrophages. A series of in vitro functional assays including flow cytometry-based macrophage phenotype profiling, phagocytosis assays, immunoblots, and viability assays were performed across cisplatin and MMAE treatment conditions. Direct and indirect co-culturing systems were used to model tumor cell-macrophage interactions. Immunocompetent murine bladder cancer models were used to evaluate therapeutic responses when combining CD44-SPP1 blockade with cisplatin or EV. RNA sequencing was performed to profile gene expression changes in tumor cells and macrophages following CD44-SPP1 axis modulation. Results: Tumor cell CD44 expression and macrophage SPP1 expression are positively correlated with cisplatin resistance and poor clinical outcomes in bladder cancer patients. SPP1-expressing macrophages were spatially localized near CD44-positive tumor cells in resistant tumors. Cisplatin and EV treatment increased CD44 and SPP1 expression in tumor cells and macrophages, respectively, and recombinant SPP1 was sufficient to induce tumor cell CD44 expression. CD44 deletion enhanced tumor cell response to cisplatin and EV, and flow cytometry and immunoblots showed that SPP1-deficient macrophages exhibit altered polarization states and enhanced phagocytic potential. Co-implantation of CD44-expressing tumor cells with SPP1-deficient macrophages reduced tumor growth. Comprehensive immune profiling of TME changes under various genetic and treatment conditions is underway. Conclusion: Disrupting the CD44-SPP1 interaction sensitizes bladder tumors to cisplatin and EV. By defining macrophage phenotypes and polarization states within the CD44-SPP1 axis, this work supports therapeutic approaches such as engineered macrophage-based immunotherapies to overcome therapeutic resistance in MIBC.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Siddiqui, None.. Y. Zhou, None.. J. Lee, None.. K. Bi, None.. J. T. Ochoa, None.. M. Egger, None.. F. L. De Carvalho, None.. K. W. Mouw, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索