PO.BCS01.04 · 生物信息与计算

免疫检查点阻断反应的泛癌转录组特征以及跨TIGER队列的基于机器学习的预测

Pan-cancer transcriptomic signatures of immune checkpoint blockade response and machine learning-based prediction across TIGER cohorts

海报缩略图:免疫检查点阻断反应的泛癌转录组特征以及跨TIGER队列的基于机器学习的预测
编号 4136 展板 16 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 2 主讲 Junqing Zhang
分会场 Application of Bioinformatics to Cancer Biology 4
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Junqing Zhang1, Hongru Shen2, Yajing Bi2, Xiangchun Li2

1Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China,2

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
免疫检查点阻断(ICB)可在一部分晚期癌症患者中诱导持久缓解,但在治疗前准确识别应答者对于最大化临床获益并避免不必要的免疫相关毒性至关重要。为满足这一需求,我们系统地分析了来自肿瘤免疫治疗基因表达资源库(TIGER)的bulk RNA-seq队列,涵盖接受ICB治疗的多种肿瘤类型,并开发了一个基于机器学习的框架,用于在泛癌、多队列环境下进行反应预测。 我们纳入了胶质母细胞瘤、头颈鳞状细胞癌、非小细胞肺癌、肾细胞癌、胃癌以及若干黑色素瘤数据集的队列,所有样本均标注为应答者或非应答者。在每个队列中,我们对应答者和非应答者之间进行差异基因表达分析,并应用Hallmark基因集富集来界定与ICB反应相关的关键生物学通路。在此基础上,我们提取转录组特征并训练支持向量机(SVM)分类器。模型性能通过队列内重复10折交叉验证进行评估,并进一步使用留一数据集(LODO)验证和黑色素瘤队列间的跨数据集测试进行检验。 在各肿瘤类型中,应答者表现出高度一致的免疫激活图谱,包括interferon-gamma/alpha反应、同种异体移植排斥反应以及TNF-NF-κB和IL6-JAK-STAT3炎症信号的显著上调,同时伴有涉及氧化磷酸化和胆固醇稳态的代谢重编程。非应答者更常表现出细胞周期和增殖通路(G2M检查点、E2F靶点)以及上皮-间质转化的富集,在黑色素瘤和肾细胞癌中具有肿瘤类型特异性的模式。SVM模型实现了良好的判别能力,许多队列内的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)超过0.7,部分接近0.9,同时在跨队列评估中保持了实际有用的性能。 总体而言,本研究勾勒出与ICB获益相关的共有免疫和代谢程序以及肿瘤类型依赖性的耐药特征,并提出了一个适用于多种癌症和队列的转录组-机器学习预测框架,为使用先进的表示学习方法进一步优化免疫治疗反应预测提供了坚实的数据和方法学基础。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can induce durable remission in a subset of patients with advanced cancer, but accurately identifying responders before treatment is essential to maximize clinical benefit and avoid unnecessary immune-related toxicities. To address this need, we systematically analyzed bulk RNA-seq cohorts from the Tumor Immunotherapy Gene Expression Resource (TIGER) encompassing multiple tumor types treated with ICB, and developed a machine learning-based framework for response prediction in a pan-cancer, multi-cohort setting. We included cohorts of glioblastoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, and several melanoma datasets, with all samples annotated as responders or non-responders. Within each cohort, we performed differential gene expression analysis between responders and non-responders and applied Hallmark gene set enrichment to define key biological pathways associated with ICB response. On this basis, we extracted transcriptomic features and trained support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Model performance was assessed by repeated 10-fold cross-validation within cohorts and further examined using leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) validation and cross-dataset testing among melanoma cohorts. Across tumor types, responders exhibited a highly consistent immune-activation landscape, including marked up-regulation of interferon-gamma/alpha responses, allograft rejection, and TNF-NF-κB and IL6-JAK-STAT3 inflammatory signaling, together with metabolic reprogramming involving oxidative phosphorylation and cholesterol homeostasis. Non-responders more frequently showed enrichment of cell-cycle and proliferation pathways (G2M checkpoint, E2F targets) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, with tumor type-specific patterns in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. SVM models achieved good discrimination, with many within-cohort areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) exceeding 0.7 and some approaching 0.9, while maintaining practically useful performance in cross-cohort evaluations. Collectively, this study delineates shared immune and metabolic programs associated with ICB benefit and tumor type-dependent resistance features, and proposes a transcriptome-machine learning prediction framework applicable across multiple cancers and cohorts, providing a solid data and methodological foundation for further optimization of immunotherapy response prediction using advanced representation learning approaches.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Zhang, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索