PO.BCS01.04 · 生物信息与计算
黑色素细胞转录状态是转移性黑色素瘤生存的独立标志物
Melanocytic transcriptional state is an independent marker of survival in metastatic melanoma
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:晚期皮肤黑色素瘤在临床结局上表现出显著的异质性,即使在被归入同一临床分期的患者中亦是如此。理解这种异质性背后的分子驱动因素对于推进治疗策略至关重要。既往研究已鉴定出不同的黑色素瘤转录组状态——Tirosh等和Balderson等一致认可一个定义"未分化"、"神经嵴"、"过渡"和"黑色素细胞"状态的四亚型模型。然而,它们的生物学和临床相关性仍不清楚。在此,我们使用数字空间RNA分析对移行转移黑色素瘤(ITM)进行分析,以将黑色素瘤转录组状态与总生存期(OS)和肢端黑色素瘤(AM)状态相关联。
方法:在由1990-2020年诊断的ITM患者构建的组织微阵列上进行数字空间分析(Nanostring GeoMx全转录组图谱)。在过滤低质量的感兴趣区域(AOI)后,我们使用噪声校正和分位数标准化处理数据。我们应用主成分分析(PCA),通过对贡献于前四个主成分的基因进行排序来定义黑色素瘤亚型特征。我们使用GSEA进行基因集富集分析,以校正p值 < 0.05定义显著性。使用最佳表达阈值定义高、低组来评估基因或基因集表达与OS之间的关联,最小组规模为20%。随后使用Cox比例风险模型评估各组间的生存差异。
结果:我们分析了一个由84例患者(116个AOI)组成的通过质控的ITM队列。转录谱的PCA揭示了不同的转录状态。PC1轴区分过渡型与未分化型黑色素瘤,PC2反映免疫细胞浸润,PC3对应基质细胞和神经嵴样黑色素瘤,PC4与黑色素细胞型黑色素瘤相关。我们从PCA结果中衍生出基因集,并将每个基因集的表达与OS相关联。在一个未经治疗的ITM队列中,黑色素细胞状态的高表达带来了7.59年的中位总生存期差异(黑色素细胞"高"=5.16年 vs "低"=12.75年,log-rank p=0.0024),并在多变量分析中独立地与不良生存相关。与非肢端病例相比,AM表现出更高的黑色素细胞状态基因表达。这些发现在外部数据集中得到验证,支持黑色素细胞状态预测不良预后。
结论:黑色素细胞转录状态与转移性黑色素瘤患者更差的总生存期独立相关,并在肢端黑色素瘤中富集,提示对黑色素细胞状态的评估可能对临床风险分层具有价值。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Advanced cutaneous melanoma shows substantial heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, even among patients classified within the same clinical stage. Understanding the molecular drivers underlying this heterogeneity is critical for advancing treatment strategies. Previous studies have identified distinct melanoma transcriptomic states - Tirosh et al . and Balderson et al. have agreed on a four-subtype model defining “Undifferentiated”, “Neural Crest”, “Transitory”, and “Melanocytic” states. However, their biological and clinical relevance remains unclear. Here we profiled in-transit melanoma (ITM) using digital spatial RNA profiling to associate melanoma transcriptomic states with overall survival (OS) and acral melanoma (AM) status.
Methods: Digital spatial profiling (Nanostring GeoMx Whole Transcriptome Atlas) was performed across a tissue microarray constructed from patients with ITM diagnosed from 1990-2020. After filtering poor quality areas of interest (AOIs), we processed the data using noise correction and quantile normalization. We applied Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to define melanoma subtype signatures by ranking genes contributing to each of the first four PCs. We performed gene set enrichment analysis using GSEA with significance defined as an adjusted p-value < 0.05. Association between gene or gene-set expression and OS was evaluated using optimal expression cutoffs to define high and low groups, with a minimum group size of 20%. Cox proportional hazards models were then used to assess survival differences between groups.
Results: We analyzed a cohort of 84 patients (116 AOIs) with ITM passing QC. PCA of transcriptional profiles revealed distinct transcriptional states. The PC1 axis differentiated Transitory from Undifferentiated melanoma, PC2 reflected immune cell infiltration, PC3 corresponded to stromal cells and Neural crest-like melanoma, and PC4 associated with Melanocytic melanoma. We derived gene sets from the PCA results and associated the expression of each gene set with OS. Across a cohort of treatment-naïve ITM, high expression of the melanocytic state conferred a median overall survival difference of 7.59 years (melanocytic ‘high'=5.16 years vs ‘low'=12.75 years, log-rank p=0.0024) and independently associated with poor survival in multivariate analysis. AMs showed higher melanocytic state gene expression compared to non-acral cases. These findings were validated in external datasets, supporting that the melanocytic state predicts poor prognosis.
Conclusion: The melanocytic transcriptional state was independently associated with worse overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma and was enriched in acral melanoma, suggesting that assessment of the melanocytic state may have value for clinical risk stratification.
利益披露 Disclosure
Z. Huang, None..
K. E. Rhodin, None..
R. Al-Rohil, None..
V. Geron, None..
M. H. O'Connor, None..
C. V. Angeles, None..
S. K. Nair, None..
G. M. Beasley, None.