PO.BCS01.10 · 生物信息与计算

通过对比学习和T细胞表型分析预测源自肿瘤浸润CD8+ T细胞的TCR对自身抗原的识别

Predicting self-antigen recognition of TCRs derived from tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells via contrastive learning and T cell phenotyping

海报缩略图:通过对比学习和T细胞表型分析预测源自肿瘤浸润CD8+ T细胞的TCR对自身抗原的识别
编号 4196 展板 23 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 4 主讲 Brinda Vijaykumar
分会场 Integrative Computational Approaches 2
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Brinda Vijaykumar, Qiaomu Tian, Jack Prazich, Preet Joshi, Neel Patel, John Abel, Anthony Coyle, Daniel Pregibon

Repertoire Immune Medicines, Cambridge, MA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
基于T细胞受体(TCR)的免疫疗法利用TCR以高特异性和高选择性结合源自细胞内靶点(包括在肿瘤上过表达的靶点)的肽段的能力。因此,从对肿瘤微环境中抗原产生应答的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)中鉴定出的TCR,是TCR免疫疗法开发的理想底物。然而,鉴于TCR和靶序列空间的多样性,为TCR去孤儿化(de-orphaning)极具挑战性。尽管多重肽-MHC(pMHC)染色检测提高了直接、离体测量TCR-pMHC结合的通量,但它们受限于TIL样本质量、T细胞浸润、TCR库多样性以及有限的pMHC文库规模。基于机器学习的技术可能通过训练模型来预测TCR-pMHC相互作用,然后在其他情境下收集的大型数据库上推断TCR-pMHC结合,从而克服这些限制。在此,我们将一个TCR-pMHC结合预测的对比模型(1)应用于来自9种适应证、包含490,000个T细胞的382个肿瘤样本。我们发现,该数据集中的TCR有5,244/490,000(约1.1%)被预测可识别我们模型训练集中4,438个pMHC之一。其中,1,949个被预测可结合常见病毒肽,这一观察结果提示存在旁观者募集和浸润。另有2,549个TCR被预测可结合I类肿瘤抗原,包括QLLALLPSL [PRAME]、YLEPGPVTA [GP100]和GLYDGMEHLI [MAGEA10]。该模型能够捕获具有多样化互补决定区(CDR)以及高度同源序列的TIL TCR。使用Repertoire的DECODE™平台(2)对预测可结合自身抗原的TCR进行了表型分析,结果显示,与病毒特异性TCR(例如巨细胞病毒、EB病毒和流感特异性TCR)上的记忆样特征相比,癌症特异性TCR往往具有更偏向细胞毒性和效应样的表型。这些结果展示了一种以高通量方式对TCR特异性进行计算去孤儿化并对T细胞进行表型表征的方法,从而加深我们对癌症患者中TCR图谱的理解。重要的是,该策略可利用现有数据集实现适用于治疗开发的TCR序列的发现。未来工作应聚焦于增加经验证的TCR-pMHC特异性的多样性,以及对预测的TCR-pMHC相互作用进行体外验证(以及报告的模型性能指标)。1. Abel, John, et al. "REPTRA: Mapping Immune T Cell Receptor Activity from Full Sequences with a Debiased Contrastive Loss." bioRxiv (2025): 2025-10. 2. Francis, Joshua M., et al. "Allelic variation in class I HLA determines CD8+ T cell repertoire shape and cross-reactive memory responses to SARS-CoV-2." Science immunology 7.67 (2021): eabk3070.
查看英文原文 English abstract
T cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapies leverage the ability of a TCR to bind with high specificity and selectivity to peptides derived from intracellular targets, including those overexpressed on tumors. Consequently, TCRs identified from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) that respond to antigens in the tumor microenvironment represent attractive substrates for TCR immunotherapy development. However, de-orphaning TCRs is exceedingly challenging given the diversity of TCR and target sequence space. Although multiplexed peptide-MHC (pMHC) staining assays have improved throughput of direct, ex vivo measurement of TCR-pMHC binding, they are limited by TIL sample quality, T cell infiltration, TCR repertoire diversity, and limited pMHC library size. Machine-learning based techniques may overcome these limitations by training models to predict TCR-pMHC interactions and then inferring TCR-pMHC binding on large databases collected in other contexts. Here, we applied a contrastive model of TCR-pMHC binding prediction (1) to 382 tumor samples from 9 indications containing 490,000 T cells. We found that 5,244/490,000 (~1.1%) of TCRs from this dataset were predicted to recognize one of the 4,438 pMHCs in our model training set. Of these, 1,949 were predicted to bind common viral peptides, an observation indicative of bystander recruitment and infiltration. An additional 2,549 TCRs were predicted to bind to Class I onco-antigens, including QLLALLPSL [PRAME], YLEPGPVTA [GP100] and GLYDGMEHLI [MAGEA10]. The model was able to capture TIL TCRs with diverse complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) as well as highly homologous sequences. TCRs predicted to bind self-antigens were phenotyped using Repertoire's DECODE™ platform (2), showing that cancer-specific TCRs tended to have a more cytotoxic and effector like phenotype compared to a memory-like signature on viral specific TCRs (e.g. TCRs specific to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and influenza). These results demonstrate a way to computationally de-orphan TCR specificities and phenotypically characterize T cells in a high-throughput manner to further our understanding of the TCR landscape in cancer patients. Importantly, this strategy could enable the discovery of TCR sequences suitable for therapeutic development using existing datasets. Future work should focus on increasing the diversity of validated TCR-pMHC specificities and in-vitro validation of predicted TCR-pMHC interactions (as well as reported model performance metrics).1. Abel, John, et al. "REPTRA: Mapping Immune T Cell Receptor Activity from Full Sequences with a Debiased Contrastive Loss." bioRxiv (2025): 2025-10.2. Francis, Joshua M., et al. "Allelic variation in class I HLA determines CD8+ T cell repertoire shape and cross-reactive memory responses to SARS-CoV-2." Science immunology 7.67 (2021): eabk3070.
利益披露 Disclosure
B. Vijaykumar, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. Q. Tian, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. J. Prazich, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. P. Joshi, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. N. Patel, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. J. Abel, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. A. Coyle, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option. D. Pregibon, Repertoire Immune Medicines Employment, Stock Option.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索