尤因肉瘤的多模态液体活检显示在放疗前具有高敏感性

Introduction: Detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with inferior outcomes in Ewing sarcoma (ES); however, ctDNA clears in nearly all patients within 2 of the 6 chemotherapy cycles before radiotherapy (RT) or surgery. Given a 3-year EFS of 37% on AEWS 1221 (metastatic) and 5-year EFS of 78% on AEWS 1031 (localized), current ctDNA testing fails to predict most relapses. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are microscopic particles studied as a biomarker in multiple cancer types. We hope to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA in ES and provide the first application of EVs in ES. Methods: cfDNA was isolated from 1mL plasma, quantified by Qubit, and sequenced as NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq v2 libraries. We performed a systematic unsupervised clustering analysis of 27 ES plasma cfDNA profiles using 4 differentially methylated regions (DMR) subsets (63 strong DMRs, top 30, top 15, and 10 promoter-proximal loci), 3 clustering algorithms (k-means, Ward hierarchical, PAM), and k=2-5 clusters, testing associations with tumor burden and progression. EV analysis involved antibody detection against ES surface markers, including LINGO1, ENPP1, CDH11, and CD99. Concentrations of EVs were determined by standardized and calibrated high-resolution flow cytometry then analyzed with custom-built software to automatically determine and apply gates. Samples were de-identified, randomly coded, and run in triplicates. The senior research technologist responsible for EV analysis was blinded to patient information and clinical data. Results: EV analysis included 36 pre-RT samples from 16 metastatic and 20 localized ES patients from a prospectively maintained biobank, with 27 pre-RT samples in the cfDNA analysis and 19 healthy donor (HD) samples. 35 of 36 patients had chemotherapy before sample collection. cfDNA concentrations were markedly elevated in ES patients compared with HD (24.4 vs 4.6 ng/mL, p<0.0001), and 74% of ES samples exceeded the HD 95th-percentile detectability threshold (7.0 ng/mL). Across clustering configurations, ES cfDNA profiles consistently exhibited reproducible methylation substructure. One configuration (PAM clustering, k = 5, 63 strong DMRs) showed a modest but permutation-supported association with primary tumor size (nominal p ≈ 0.04; empirical p ≈ 0.03-0.04). ES samples had increased EV concentration compared to HD (p<0.001), with AUC 0.988 for distinguishing between ES and HD ENPP1 (p<0.0001). The highest ENPP1 EV values were in patients with large primary tumors (>8 cm vs. ≤ 8cm) and metastatic disease (p=0.066). Conclusions: cfDNA- and EV-based liquid biopsy provide encouraging signals for high ES detectability pre-RT. We also show the first study of EVs as a novel biomarker in ES, which may provide complementary information to ctDNA. Multimodal liquid biopsy in ES may identify candidate patients for systemic or local therapy escalation and facilitate personalized care.