PO.CL01.10 · 临床研究

用于分子残留病灶检测的超灵敏全基因组测序检测的分析性能

Analytical performance of an ultrasensitive whole genome sequencing assay for molecular residual disease detection

海报缩略图:用于分子残留病灶检测的超灵敏全基因组测序检测的分析性能
编号 5307 展板 2 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 45 主讲 Andrew Georgiadis
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 4
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Andrew Georgiadis1, Christopher Greco1, Cynthia Maddox1, Paul McGregor1, Cesar Nalvarte1, Kaitlin Victor1, Amanda Harvey1, Shelby Bain1, Robert Summersgill1, Ana Perez-Lebron1, Liam Cox1, Stephen Higgings1, David Riley1, Samuel Angiuoli1, Marcia Eisenberg2, Brian Caveney2, Eric Severson2, Taylor J. Jenson2, Shakti Ramkissoon2, Mark Sausen1

1Laboratory Corporation of America, Baltimore, MD,2Laboratory Corporation of America, Durham, NC

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
在根治性干预后的非转移性癌症中,相当一部分患者残留肿瘤细胞,可导致疾病复发。这些残留肿瘤细胞可通过超灵敏的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测被检出,并报告为分子残留病灶(MRD)。最常见的方法通常采用患者特异性的定制panel,其初始检测周转时间较长,且游离DNA(cfDNA)投入量要求相对较高。在此,我们提出一种基于全基因组测序(WGS)的非定制方法,该方法利用Ultima Genomics(UG)测序平台的原生双链纠错,实现初始检测的快速周转和低cfDNA投入。具体而言,患者的肿瘤、白细胞和血浆来源的DNA通过UG 100平台上无PCR的WGS工作流程分别测序至约80x、30x和80x深度。这些数据在仪器上进行去多重化并比对到hg38人类参考基因组。配对肿瘤和白细胞样本的配对变异检出使用UG改良的DeepVariant算法进行,随后过滤以仅保留肿瘤特异性单核苷酸变异(SNV)。在这些肿瘤特异性SNV位置进行血浆变异分析,以利用配对正负链测序(ppmSeq)方法,允许≥Q60碱基质量,相当于理论上1×10⁻⁶的错误率。随后基于样本特异性机器学习模型加权和归一化信号相对于非癌症供者血浆样本参考人群(n=85)的水平,评估ctDNA状态和丰度。我们针对120例非癌症供者血浆样本,对照临床全基因组体细胞突变谱评估了分析特异性,证实特异性>99.5%。使用五种商业可得的细胞系,在1-500 ppm之间的十个水平上评估了ctDNA检测的分析灵敏度,证实95%检测限<5 ppm。此外,在膀胱癌、乳腺癌、结肠癌和结直肠癌患者队列的术前、未经治疗的血浆样本中评估了分析一致性。综上所述,这些数据支持肿瘤指导的非定制MRD方法在广泛的实体瘤类型和根治性临床场景中用于ctDNA检测的重大潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
In non-metastatic cancers after curative intent intervention, a significant subset of patients retain tumor cells which can lead to disease recurrence. These residual tumor cells can be detected through ultra-sensitive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays and reported as molecular residual disease (MRD). The most common approaches generally utilize patient-specific, bespoke panels, which have extended turnaround times for initial testing and relatively high cell-free DNA (cfDNA) input requirements.  Here we present a non-bespoke approach based on whole genome sequencing (WGS), which leverages native duplex error correction using the Ultima Genomics (UG) sequencing platform for rapid turnaround times for initial testing with low cfDNA input. Specifically, patient tumor, white blood cell, and plasma derived DNA were sequenced to approximately 80x, 30x, and 80x depth, respectively, through a PCR-free WGS workflow on the UG 100 platform. These data were demultiplexed and aligned on-instrument to the hg38 human reference genome. Paired variant calling for matched tumor and white blood cell samples was performed with the UG-adapted DeepVariant algorithm, and subsequently filtered to retain only tumor-specific single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Plasma variant analyses at those tumor-specific SNV positions were performed to leverage the paired plus-minus sequencing (ppmSeq) approach and allowed for ≥Q60 base quality, equating to a theoretical 1x10 -6 error rate. ctDNA status and abundance was then assessed based on the level of the sample-specific machine learning model weighted and normalized signal compared to a reference population of noncancerous donor plasma samples (n=85). We assessed analytical specificity for 120 noncancerous donor plasma samples evaluated against clinical whole-genome somatic mutation profiles and demonstrated a specificity > 99.5%. Analytical sensitivity for ctDNA detection was assessed using five commercially available cell lines across ten levels between 1 - 500 parts per million (ppm) and demonstrated a 95% limit of detection < 5 ppm. Additionally, analytical concordance was evaluated in pre-surgical, treatment naïve plasma samples across a cohort of patients with bladder, breast, colon, and colorectal cancers. Taken together, these data support the significant potential for tumor-informed, non-bespoke MRD approaches for ctDNA detection across a broad range of solid tumor types and curative-intent clinical settings.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Georgiadis, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Patent. C. Greco, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. C. Maddox, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. P. McGregor, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. C. Nalvarte, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. K. Victor, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. A. Harvey, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. S. Bain, Library Employment, Stock, Stock Option. R. Summersgill, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. A. Perez-Lebron, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. L. Cox, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. S. Higgings, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. D. Riley, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Patent. S. Angiuoli, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Patent. M. Eisenberg, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. B. Caveney, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. E. Severson, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. T. J. Jenson, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. S. Ramkissoon, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option. M. Sausen, Labcorp Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Patent.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索