PO.CL01.10 · 临床研究
对调控区域cfDNA WGS的片段组学分析生成基因水平的类表达特征用于乳腺癌亚型分析
Fragmentomic analysis of cfDNA WGS at regulatory regions generates gene-level expression-like traits for subtype analysis in breast cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:对液体活检中游离DNA(cfDNA)的分析提供了一种快速、可重复且无创的方式来研究肿瘤生物学。在乳腺癌中,侵入性组织活检和免疫组化(IHC)仍是确定分子亚型和治疗选择的标准。然而,对cfDNA全基因组测序(WGS)的片段组学分析可通过其与核小体定位的关系,产生具有生物学意义的肿瘤转录状态替代指标。在此,我们描述了一种基于WGS的片段组学流程,能够从cfDNA中重现基因水平的类表达特征。这些特征使得能够开发反映组织表达标志物(如激素受体和HER2)的片段组学分类器。
实验步骤:分析了25例知情同意的乳腺癌患者的配对FFPE肿瘤块和血浆样本。血浆cfDNA进行WGS测序至30-40×深度,配对的FFPE RNA通过RNA测序进行谱分析。cfDNA读段通过一个片段组学流程处理,量化分配给邻近基因的预定义调控区域内的片段大小和覆盖度特性。对RNA-seq的基因水平表达进行分析,并应用了已建立的乳腺癌分子亚型分类器。将片段组学信号与相同基因的RNA表达进行相关分析。样本被分为训练集(n = 17)和测试集(n = 8),Pearson相关系数 > 0.4的特征被用于弹性网络模型,以从cfDNA片段组学数据预测ESR1表达。
结果:弹性网络模型预测的ESR1评分在训练集中的Spearman相关系数为0.99(p = 0.003),在测试集中为0.64(p = 0.10)。模型选定区域的片段组学信号热图与相应的RNA-seq表达模式相吻合。模型鉴定出的基因包括DLG5和MTUS1(两者在ESR1高表达样本中均上调)以及SMC4(在ESR1高表达样本中下调),与已知的ER相关生物学一致。
总结与结论:这些发现表明,源自高深度WGS的cfDNA片段组学模式能够重现反映乳腺癌肿瘤生物学的基因水平类表达特征。将调控区域片段组学与表达信息建模相结合,能够直接从血浆中无创推断分子表型,如雌激素受体状态。深度WGS数据在RNA-seq支持下,还可用于定义靶区域,从而在靶向杂交捕获panel中实现基因水平的表达片段组学。该方法凸显了cfDNA片段组学作为基于组织的转录组和IHC谱分析替代方法的潜力,支持开发基于液体活检的分类器用于乳腺癌分型和治疗分层。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsy provides a rapid, repeatable, and non-invasive means to study tumor biology. In breast cancer, invasive tissue biopsies and immunohistochemistry (IHC) remain the standard for determining molecular subtype and treatment selection. However, fragmentomic analysis of cfDNA whole genome sequencing (WGS) can yield biologically meaningful surrogates of tumor transcriptional states through its relationship with nucleosome positioning. Here, we describe a WGS-based fragmentomic pipeline that recapitulates gene-level, expression-like traits from cfDNA. These traits enable the development of fragmentomic classifiers reflective of tissue expression markers such as hormone receptor and HER2.
Experimental Procedures: Matched FFPE tumor blocks and plasma samples from 25 consenting patients with breast cancer were analyzed. Plasma cfDNA underwent WGS to 30-40× depth, and matched FFPE RNA was profiled by RNA sequencing. cfDNA reads were processed through a fragmentomic pipeline quantifying fragment size and coverage properties across predefined regulatory regions assigned to nearby genes. Gene-level expression from RNA-seq was analyzed and established breast cancer molecular subtype classifiers were applied. Fragmentomic signals were correlated with RNA expression for the same genes. Samples were split into training (n = 17) and test (n = 8) sets, and features with Pearson correlation > 0.4 were used in an elastic net model to predict ESR1 expression from cfDNA fragmentomic data.
Results: The elastic net model's predicted ESR1 score showed a Spearman correlation of 0.99 (p = 0.003) in the training set and 0.64 (p = 0.10) in the test set. Heatmaps of fragmentomic signal at model-selected regions mirrored corresponding RNA-seq expression patterns. Genes identified by the model included DLG5 and MTUS1 (both upregulated in samples with high ESR1 expression), and SMC4 (downregulated in samples with high ESR1 expression), consistent with known ER-associated biology.
Summary and Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that cfDNA fragmentomic patterns derived from high-depth WGS can recapitulate gene-level, expression-like traits reflective of tumor biology in breast cancer. Integrating regulatory-region fragmentomics with expression-informed modeling enables non-invasive inference of molecular phenotypes such as estrogen receptor status directly from plasma. The deep WGS data, supported by RNA-seq, could also be leveraged to define target regions to enable gene-level expression fragmentomics in targeted hybrid capture panels. This approach highlights the potential of cfDNA fragmentomics as a surrogate for tissue-based transcriptomic and IHC profiling, supporting development of liquid biopsy-based classifiers for breast cancer subtyping and therapeutic stratification.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. H. Shepherd,
GeneCentric Employment.
J. Burdine,
GeneCentric Employment.
Y. Shibata,
GeneCentric Employment.
G. M. Mayhew,
GeneCentric Employment.
G. Milburn,
GeneCentric Employment.
M. V. Milburn,
GeneCentric Employment.
M. LaBella,
Myriad Genetics Employment.
S. Killpack,
Myriad Genetics Employment.
K. L. Pappan,
GeneCentric Employment.
J. M. Davison,
GeneCentric Employment.
K. Beebe,
GeneCentric Employment.