PO.CL01.10 · 临床研究

用于早期癌症检测的基于cfDNA的全基因组多特征分类器的分析精密度与跨平台可复现性

Analytical precision and cross-platform replicability of cfDNA-based genome-wide multi-feature classifiers for early cancer detection

海报缩略图:用于早期癌症检测的基于cfDNA的全基因组多特征分类器的分析精密度与跨平台可复现性
编号 5315 展板 10 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 45 主讲 Vishruth Girish
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 4
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Vishruth Girish1, Alice C. Eastman1, Adrianna L. Bartolomucci1, Akshaya V. Annapragada1, Hope Orjuela1, Carter Norton1, Daniel H. Du1, Sarah Short1, Christopher M. Cherry1, James R. White1, Shashikant Koul1, Vilmos Adleff1, Zachariah H. Foda2, Jillian Phallen1, Victor E. Velculescu1, Robert B. Scharpf3

1The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,2Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,3Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:全基因组液体活检提供了一种无创的癌症检测、管理和监测方法,并正日益被应用于癌症诊疗全程。这些方法探查游离DNA(cfDNA)片段组的众多基因组特征,相较于传统影像学和其他血液生物标志物具有潜在的性能优势。随着基于cfDNA的片段组方法走向临床部署,验证其在不同测序平台间的分析精密度和可复现性对于实现其全部临床潜力至关重要。 方法:我们开发了一种兼容自动化的两步板式方案,结合末端修复和加A尾,可并行处理48个样本。为系统评估该方案的分析精密度,我们设计了一项精密度研究,使用来自12名无癌个体以及肺癌(n=10)或肝癌(n=2)个体的大体积(约20 mL)血浆。三种独特的预设板式布局确保每位供者至少有12个基因组文库重复,在板内和板间具有不同的行列分配。同时,cfDNA使用我们既往发表的三步管式方案处理,在三种独特的管式布局中每位供者至少有6个基因组文库重复。每位操作员处理两种独特的板式布局和两种独特的管式布局,所有文库均使用3 ng输入cfDNA。 结果:与基于板的两步方案相比,基于管的三步方案的文库产量更高(6.51 nM vs 5.25 nM)。测序前分析显示,在匹配的重复样本间,文库QC指标中存在可测量的操作员效应。所有文库均在NovaSeq 6000和NovaSeq X上进行全基因组测序至1-2x的平均深度。测序后,统一应用锁定的计算流程进行比对和特征汇总,通过短片段(100-150 bp)与长片段(151-220 bp)的比率(S/L比率)生成非重叠5 Mb分箱中的全基因组片段化、染色体臂水平的非整倍体测量以及肺癌和肝癌分类器评分。通过使用Stan软件实现贝叶斯分层模型,评估了这些特征和分类器评分的批内和批间精密度。 结论:本研究旨在提供对基于cfDNA的特征和分类器中检测方法及平台驱动变异性的详细评估。初步发现支持可扩展、兼容自动化的板式方案的可行性,并强调了临床实施中对稳健工作流程的需求。正在进行的分析将确定分类器性能在方案和测序平台转换间的稳定性,为不断演进的液体活检技术提供最佳实践指导。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Genome-wide liquid biopsies offer a non-invasive approach to cancer detection, management, and monitoring, and are increasingly being adopted across the cancer care continuum. These approaches interrogate a multitude of genomic features of the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentome, providing potential performance advantages over traditional imaging and other blood-based biomarkers. As cfDNA-based fragmentome methods move towards clinical deployment, validating their analytical precision and replicability across sequencing platforms is essential to realize their full clinical potential. Methods: We developed an automation-compatible two-step plate protocol that combines end repair and A-tailing to process 48 samples in parallel. To systematically assess the analytical precision of this protocol, we designed a precision study using large volume (~20 mL) plasma from 12 individuals without cancer and individuals with lung (n=10) or liver (n=2) cancer. Three unique pre-specified plate layouts ensured that there was a minimum of 12 genomic library replicates per donor, with distinct row and column assignments within and between plates. In parallel, cfDNA was processed using our previously published three-step tube protocol, with a minimum of 6 genomic library replicates across three unique tube layouts. Each operator processed two unique plate and two unique tube layouts, with 3 ng input cfDNA for all libraries. Results: Library yields were higher with the tube-based three-step protocol compared to the plate-based two-step protocol (6.51 nM vs 5.25 nM). Presequencing analyses revealed measurable operator effects in library QC metrics across matched replicates. All libraries were sequenced genome-wide to a mean depth of 1-2x on both the NovaSeq 6000 and NovaSeq X. Post-sequencing, locked computational pipelines for alignment and feature summarization were applied uniformly, generating genome-wide fragmentation in non-overlapping 5 Mb bins via short (100-150 bp) to long (151-220 bp) fragment ratios (S/L ratios), chromosome arm-level measures of aneuploidy, and lung and liver cancer classifier scores. The intra- and inter-batch precision of these features and classifier scores was assessed by implementing a Bayesian hierarchical model using the Stan software. Conclusions: This study aims to provide a detailed assessment of assay- and platform-driven variability in cfDNA-based features and classifiers. Initial findings support the feasibility of scalable, automation-compatible plate-based protocols, and emphasize the need for robust workflows in clinical implementation. Ongoing analyses will determine the stability of classifier performance across protocol and sequencing platform transitions, informing best practices for evolving liquid biopsy technologies.
利益披露 Disclosure
V. Girish, None.. A. C. Eastman, None.. A. L. Bartolomucci, None. A. V. Annapragada, Artemyx Patent, Other, Co-founder. DELFI Diagnostics Patent. H. Orjuela, None.. C. Norton, None.. D. H. Du, None.. S. Short, None. C. M. Cherry, CMCC Consulting Other, Owner. J. R. White, None.. S. Koul, None. V. Adleff, DELFI Diagnostics Patent, Other, Co-founder, Consultant. Z. H. Foda, Artemyx Other, Co-founder. DELFI Diagnostics Patent. J. Phallen, Artemyx Patent, Other, Co-founder. DELFI Diagnostics Patent, Other, Co-founder. V. E. Velculescu, Artemyx Patent, Other, Co-founder. DELFI Diagnostics g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Patent, Other, Co-founder. Viron Therapeutics Other, Advisor. Epitope Other, Advisor. LabCorp Patent. Qiagen Patent. Sysmex Patent. Agios Patent. Genzyme Patent. Esoterix Patent. Ventana Patent. ManaT Bio Patent. R. B. Scharpf, Artemyx Patent, Other, Co-founder. DELFI Diagnostics Patent, Other, Co-founder, Consultant.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索