PO.CL09.01 · 临床研究
整合机器学习与大语言模型揭示KRAS突变型肺癌中生存和治疗反应的分子决定因素
Integrated machine learning and large language models reveal molecular determinants of survival and treatment response in KRAS-mutant lung cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:KRAS激活突变是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中最普遍的致癌驱动因素,其中KRAS G12C为主要亚型。FDA批准的小分子抑制剂(sotorasib和adagrasib)改善了KRAS G12C阳性患者的结局,尽管反应仍存在异质性。为剖析治疗反应和总生存期的临床与分子决定因素,我们分析了具有多模态临床注释和靶向测序的大型KRAS突变型NSCLC队列,整合了计算和机器学习(ML)方法。
方法:从UCSF Information Commons(数据于2025年3月发布)检索了679例KRAS突变型NSCLC患者,包括43例接受KRAS抑制剂治疗的患者。使用基于SQL的算法和大语言模型从临床病历中提取临床、病理、靶向肿瘤外显子组测序、生存和治疗反应数据。为ML模型(包括随机森林(RF)、多层感知机(MLP)和XGBoost(XGB))生成了结构化数据集。使用独立的MSK-IMPACT队列(n=2,152)进行验证。所有计算分析在UCSF Wynton HPC集群上进行。
结果:比较UCSF KRAS G12C(n=185)与非G12C KRAS(n=494)初治肿瘤之间的共现突变,我们识别出14个显著差异突变(Fisher精确检验,BH校正p<0.05)。LRP1B、KEAP1、RUNX1T1、ATP6AP1、ZFTA、TRAF7和NF2基因突变在KRAS G12C队列中富集。临床基因数据以中等准确度预测了KRAS抑制剂治疗结局(TO)(疾病稳定 vs 进展)和总生存期(OS),模型为RF(TO:0.67,OS:0.64)、MLP(TO:0.83,OS:0.73)和XGB(TO:0.67,OS:0.73)。有趣的是,模型识别出NAV3、COL2A1、MLH3、PTPRD和SOS2的共突变与肿瘤稳定相关,IGFBP3、SPEN和PTPRB的共突变与肿瘤进展相关,而DUSP4、WHSC1、EBF1和MAP2K4的共突变是不良OS的潜在协变量。使用MSK-IMPACT队列的临床-基因检测数据进行的OS的ML预测分别达到了0.80(RF)、0.72(MLP)和0.81(XGB)的AUROC值。特征重要性分析强调转移、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)以及ERCC5、BCOR和SPEN的突变为不良OS的主要预测因素。
结论:对真实世界多模态临床数据的分析揭示了KRAS G12C与非G12C NSCLC之间不同的生物学和基因组特征,以及生存和治疗反应的关键决定因素。本研究证明了LLM生成的结构化临床数据在AI/ML驱动的肿瘤学研究和假设生成中的价值,并突显了其改善个体化治疗决策的潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: KRAS activating mutations are the most prevalent oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with KRAS G12C as the dominant subtype. FDA-approved small-molecule inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have improved outcomes in KRAS G12C positive patients, though responses remain heterogeneous. To dissect clinical and molecular determinants of treatment response and overall survival, we analyzed large KRAS-mutant NSCLC cohorts with multimodal clinical annotation and targeted sequencing, integrating computational and machine learning (ML) approaches.
Methods: 679 KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients including 43 patients treated with KRAS inhibitors were retrieved from UCSF Information Commons (data released in March 2025). Clinical, pathological, targeted tumor exome sequencing, survival, and treatment-response data were extracted from clinical notes using SQL-based algorithms and large language models. Structured datasets were generated for ML models including random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and XGBoost (XGB). An independent MSK-IMPACT cohort (n=2,152) was used for validation. All computational analyses were performed on the UCSF Wynton HPC cluster.
Results: Comparing co-occurring mutations between UCSF KRAS G12C (n=185) and non-G12C KRAS (n=494) treatment naïve tumors, we identified 14 significant differential mutations (Fisher's exact test, BH-corrected p<0.05). LRP1B, KEAP1, RUNX1T1, ATP6AP1, ZFTA, TRAF7, and NF2 gene mutations were enriched in the KRAS G12C cohort. Clinical genetic data predicted KRAS inhibitor treatment outcomes (TO) (stable vs progressive disease) and overall survival (OS) with modest accuracies by models of RF (TO:0.67, OS:0.64), MLP (TO:0.83, OS:0.73), and XGB (TO: 0.67, OS:0.73). Intriguingly, the models identified co-mutations of NAV3, COL2A1, MLH3, PTPRD, and SOS2 associated with stable tumor disease, co-mutations of IGFBP3, SPEN and PTPRB correlated with progressive tumor disease, whereas co-mutations of DUSP4, WHSC1, EBF1 and MAP2K4 are potential covariates for poor OS. ML prediction of OS using MSK-IMPACT cohort with clinico-genetic test data achieved AUROC values of 0.80 (RF), 0.72 (MLP), and 0.81 (XGB), respectively. Feature-importance analyses highlighted metastasis, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and mutations in ERCC5, BCOR, and SPEN as major predictors of poor OS.
Conclusion: Analysis of real-world multimodal clinical data revealed distinct biological and genomic features between KRAS G12C and non-G12C NSCLC, as well as key determinants of survival and treatment response. This study demonstrates the value of LLM-generated structured clinical data for AI/ML-driven oncology research with hypotheses generation and highlights its potential to improve personalized treatment decision-making.
利益披露 Disclosure
Q. Li, None..
A. Lee, None.
T. G. Bivona,
Revolution Medicines Independent Contractor, ).
Verastem ).
Nextpoint ).
Relay Independent Contractor.
EcoR Independent Contractor.
Engine Independent Contractor.
Novartis Independent Contractor.
Pfizer Independent Contractor.
AstraZeneca Independent Contractor.
Genentech Independent Contractor.
Abbvie Independent Contractor.
Daiichi Sankyo Independent Contractor.
Granule Therapeutics Independent Contractor.