PO.ET02.13 · 实验与分子治疗

针对AML的结构性表面蛋白靶点

Structural surface protein targets for AML

海报缩略图:针对AML的结构性表面蛋白靶点
编号 4513 展板 4 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 15 主讲 Neal Goodwin, PhD
分会场 Hematologic Malignancies and Novel Therapeutic Modalities
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

James Dowell, Daniel Benjamin, Patric Sadecki, Jonathan Schmitz, Anjali Nelliat, Anna Ritter, Neal C. Goodwin

Immuto Scientific, Inc., Madison, WI

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:AML中几乎所有当前的抗体或CAR-T导向疗法(如CD33)所靶向的抗原也表达(通常水平较低)于健康的造血干/祖细胞(HSPCs)上,从而引起剂量限制性的骨髓清除或长时间的血细胞减少。受这一对肿瘤特异性靶点的迫切需求驱动,我们开发了一种深度学习方法,将结构蛋白质组学与多模态生物网络整合以及高通量蛋白复合物结构预测相结合,基于预测的表面定位、蛋白-蛋白相互作用(PPIs)的变化、构象变化程度及估计的潜在治疗相关性来预测潜在靶点。 方法:使用蛋白标记试剂,通过定量LC-MS/MS量化氨基酸表面可及性及溶剂可及性(SASA)的变化。采用这一创新方法,将经全反式维甲酸(atRA)处理的NOMO-1 AML细胞的全局结构性表面蛋白质组的变化与经溶媒处理的细胞进行比较。使用表面蛋白质组定位评分对具有显著SASA变化的肽段(FDR:q < 0.05;log2倍数变化 > +/-1)进行过滤,并针对该蛋白列表生成构象集合,由一个在表面蛋白质组学数据上微调的定制GNN结构编码器进行评分。此外,为鉴定界面SASA变化的PPIs,首先将全对全的蛋白对列表输入一个基于图注意力的模块,该模块整合多种数据模态以保留高置信度的相互作用,随后将其传递给AlphaFold-Multimer进行复合物结构预测,最终由基于界面SASA的评分函数预测靶标PPIs。 结果:全局结构分析从3,540个蛋白中鉴定出20,933个修饰肽段,其中来自1,089个蛋白的2,627个肽段表现出显著的SASA变化。这些蛋白及相应的1089×1089候选PPIs由我们的AI/ML流程进行分析,生成最终的潜在结构靶点排序列表,排名靠前的候选者对AML表现出高预测亲和力和特异性。本研究获得的数据集已成功鉴定出响应atRA处理、且独立于atRA-RARA分化的新表面靶点。 结论:我们的结构蛋白质组学平台通过鉴定新型结构性表面靶点,显著拓宽了AML中潜在的可成药空间。本研究获得的数据集已成功鉴定出响应多种atRA诱导机制的新表面靶点。本研究中排名靠前的结构靶点正作为AML潜在的抗体-药物偶联物(ADCs)疗法进行评估。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Nearly all current antibody- or CAR-T-directed therapies in AML (e.g., CD33) target antigens that are also expressed (often at lower levels) on healthy hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), causing dose-limiting myeloablation or prolonged cytopenias. Driven by this critical need for tumor-specific targets, we developed a deep learning approach that combines structural proteomics with multi-modal biological network integration and high-throughput protein complex structure prediction to predict potential targets based on predicted surface localization, changes in protein-protein interactions (PPIs), degree of conformational change, and estimated potential therapeutic relevance. Methods: Protein tagging reagents were used to quantify changes in amino acid surface accessibility and solvent accessibility (SASA) via quantitative LC-MS/MS. Using this innovative approach, changes in the global structural surfaceome of NOMO-1 AML cells treated with all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) were compared with those of vehicle-treated cells. Peptides with significant SASA changes (FDR: q < 0.05; log 2 fold-change > +/-1) were filtered using a surfaceome localization score, and conformational ensembles generated for this protein list were scored by a custom GNN-based structure encoder fine-tuned on surface proteomics data. Further, to identify PPIs with interface SASA changes, an all-by-all list of protein pairs was first fed to a graph attention-based module integrating multiple data modalities to retain high-confidence interactions, which were subsequently passed to AlphaFold-Multimer for complex structure prediction, and final target PPIs were predicted by a scoring function based on interface SASA. Results: The global structural analysis identified 20,933 modified peptides from 3,540 proteins, of which 2,627 peptides from 1,089 proteins exhibited significant changes in SASA. These proteins and the corresponding 1089×1089 candidate PPIs were analyzed by our AI/ML pipeline to generate a final ranked list of potential structural targets, with the top candidates demonstrating high predicted affinity and specificity against AML. The data set achieved in the current study has successfully identified new surface targets in response to atRA treatment that are independent of atRA-RARA differentiation. Conclusion: Our structural proteomics platform significantly broadens the potential druggable space in AML by identifying novel structural surface targets. The data set achieved in the current study has successfully identified new surface targets in response to multiple atRA-induced mechanisms. The top-ranked structural targets from this study are being evaluated as potential antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)-based therapies for AML.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Dowell, None.. D. Benjamin, None.. P. Sadecki, None.. J. Schmitz, None.. A. Nelliat, None.. A. Ritter, None.. N. C. Goodwin, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索