PO.IM01.12 · 免疫学

STING通路激活揭示可能限制腺样囊性癌免疫刺激反应的反馈抑制

STING pathway activation reveals feedback inhibition potentially limiting immunostimulatory response in adenoid cystic carcinoma

海报缩略图:STING通路激活揭示可能限制腺样囊性癌免疫刺激反应的反馈抑制
编号 4299 展板 3 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 8 主讲 Annie Li, MD
分会场 Immunomodulatory Agents
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Annie Li1, Samantha E. Flynn1, Prinjali Kalyan1, Dawn R. Mitchell1, Chengzhou Gao1, Edwin Zhang1, Diane Yang1, Ross D. Merkin2, William C. Faquin1, Daniel L. Faden3, Xin Gao2, Jong Chul Park2, Lori J. Wirth2, A. John Iafrate1

1Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,2Departments of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
腺样囊性癌(ACC)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,其特征为生长缓慢但转移率高,约40-60%的患者会发生远处疾病。全身治疗,包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),显示出极小的疗效,多项临床试验未能为复发或转移性ACC找到有效的治疗方法。在此前的工作中,我们使用多重免疫荧光(mIF)分析了ACC免疫微环境,发现ACC是“冷”肿瘤,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)稀少,且在我们24例ACC队列中几乎所有分析样本中B2M和HLA I类分子表达均一致偏低。只有转移灶显示出局灶性HLA I类分子表达。空间转录组学分析显示,这些局灶阳性区域与一种干扰素-γ驱动的转录程序相关。用干扰素-γ或STING激动剂对ACC组织进行短期离体处理可强烈上调HLA I类分子、B2M和PD-L1,提示ACC的免疫可见性可通过药物手段恢复。然而,使用替代细胞系(鉴于缺乏已建立的ACC细胞系),我们观察到STING激活诱导了一个负反馈环路,导致STING信号通路受抑制,在24小时后STING、IRF3和TBK1表达降低。与一系列药物联合处理——包括蛋白酶体和溶酶体抑制剂、激酶通路抑制剂、表观遗传调节剂以及NF-κB或PI3K/AKT信号的调节剂——均未能阻止这种反馈抑制。在临床上,一名ACC患者接受STING激动剂dazostinag和帕博利珠单抗(pembrolizumab)联合治疗九个月,肿瘤负荷降低约70%,而其他患者则出现疾病稳定或进展。一种假说是,STING反馈机制的差异性激活可能是这些不同临床反应的基础。这些发现表明,虽然ACC细胞保留了上调抗原提呈通路的机制,但STING通路抑制的内在机制可能限制免疫刺激反应的持久性,凸显出在ACC中需要维持干扰素信号的策略。正在进行的工作聚焦于识别克服这种反馈抑制的策略,以及测试能够在不触发同一抑制性级联反应的情况下增强抗原提呈的替代药物,目标是为ACC开发更持久的免疫刺激疗法。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy characterized by indolent growth but a high rate of metastasis, with approximately 40-60% of patients developing distant disease. Systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have shown minimal efficacy, and multiple clinical trials have failed to identify effective treatments for recurrent or metastatic ACC. In previous work, we profiled the ACC immune microenvironment using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and found that ACCs are “cold” tumors, with scarce tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and uniformly low expression of B2M and HLA class I across nearly all analyzed samples in our cohort of 24 ACCs. Only metastatic lesions displayed focal HLA class I expression. Spatial transcriptomic analysis revealed that these focally positive regions were associated with an interferon-gamma-driven transcriptional program. Short-term ex vivo treatment of ACC tissues with interferon-gamma or a STING agonist strongly upregulated HLA class I, B2M, and PD-L1, suggesting that immune visibility of ACC can be pharmacologically restored. However, using surrogate cell lines (given the lack of established ACC cell lines), we observed that STING activation induced a negative feedback loop leading to suppression of STING signaling pathway with reduced STING, IRF3 and TBK1 expression after 24 hours. Co-treatment with a range of agents - including proteasome and lysosome inhibitors, kinase pathway inhibitors, epigenetic modifiers, and modulators of NF-κB or PI3K/AKT signaling - did not prevent this feedback inhibition. Clinically, one ACC patient treated with a combination of a STING agonist dazostinag and pembrolizumab over nine months showed a ~70% reduction in tumor burden, while other patients experienced stable or progressive disease. One hypothesis is that differential activation of the STING feedback mechanism may underlie these varied clinical responses. These findings indicate that while ACC cells retain the machinery to upregulate antigen-presentation pathways, intrinsic mechanisms of STING pathway repression may limit the durability of immunostimulatory responses, underscoring the need for strategies to sustain interferon signaling in ACC. Ongoing work focuses on identifying strategies to overcome this feedback inhibition and on testing alternative agents capable of enhancing antigen presentation without triggering the same suppressive cascade, with the goal of developing more durable immunostimulatory therapies for ACC.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Li, None.. S. E. Flynn, None.. P. Kalyan, None.. D. R. Mitchell, None.. C. Gao, None.. E. Zhang, None.. D. Yang, None.. R. D. Merkin, None.. W. C. Faquin, None. D. L. Faden, Bristol Myers Squibb Funding. Calico Funding. Predicine Funding. NeoGenomics Funding. BostonGene Funding. Haystack Funding. Merck Consulting fees and honoraria. Noetic Consulting fees and honoraria. Focus Consulting fees and honoraria. Guide Point Consulting fees and honoraria. Chrysalis Biomedical Advisors Consulting fees and honoraria. Acadia Consulting fees and honoraria. X. Gao, None.. J. Park, None.. L. J. Wirth, None. A. Iafrate, Invitae Royalties. Kinnate Biopharma Scientific Advisory Board member. Repare Therapeutics Scientific Advisory Board member. PAIGE.AI Scientific Advisory Board member. SequreDx Scientific Advisory Board member. Intellia Scientific Advisory Board member.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索