PO.IM02.04 · 免疫学

整合新抗原免疫原性与肿瘤克隆性以预测免疫治疗应答

Integrating neoantigen immunogenicity and tumor clonality for predicting immunotherapy response

海报缩略图:整合新抗原免疫原性与肿瘤克隆性以预测免疫治疗应答
编号 4253 展板 21 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 6 主讲 Ko-Han Lee, MD
分会场 Adaptive Immunity in Cancer
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ko-Han Lee, Timothy Sears, Maurizio Zanetti, Hannah K. Carter

University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:癌症免疫治疗已经变革了治疗格局,但应答率仍不理想。免疫原性新抗原——引发T细胞应答的肿瘤特异性肽——是有前景的生物标志物,但当前的预测方法存在关键局限:它们主要聚焦于MHC-I而忽视了MHC-I/II的协同作用,并依赖于肿瘤突变负荷(TMB),后者缺乏免疫原性特异性且忽略了肿瘤异质性。我们开发了NeoPrecis,这是一个将免疫原性预测与肿瘤亚克隆结构相整合的计算框架,用于改进免疫治疗应答预测。 方法:NeoPrecis由两个模块组成,分别捕获以突变为中心和以肿瘤为中心的免疫原性背景。NeoPrecis-Immuno对野生型到突变型肽的距离进行建模,以估计T细胞识别的可能性,纳入了氨基酸嵌入、MHC结合基序、位置因素和肽序列。该模型在TCR结合数据上进行预训练以区分肽-TCR交叉反应性,然后在T细胞检测数据上进行微调。NeoPrecis-Landscape将MHC-I和MHC-II免疫原性预测与PyClone推断的亚克隆结构相整合。对于每个亚克隆,免疫原性被计算为其MHC-I和MHC-II评分的乘积。随后,肿瘤水平的免疫原性被计算为所有亚克隆评分的加权平均值,权重由亚克隆流行度决定。 结果:在一个具有经验证的CD4+/CD8+ T细胞检测的独立胃肠道癌数据集上,NeoPrecis-Immuno的表现优于PRIME、ICERFIRE和DeepNeo。其可解释的架构通过等位基因获益评分量化等位基因特异性贡献,该评分在黑色素瘤(p=0.04)和NSCLC(p=0.01)中显示出显著的预后关联,且独立于特定突变。在五个黑色素瘤队列和三个NSCLC队列中,NeoPrecis-Landscape在分层ICI应答者方面优于TMB,尤其是在黑色素瘤和异质性NSCLC中。同质、经过大量免疫编辑的NSCLC(主要为吸烟者肿瘤)显示出基于新抗原的预测能力下降。 结论:NeoPrecis提供了一个用于新抗原免疫原性评估的可解释框架。通过整合肿瘤亚克隆结构,它在预测ICI应答方面优于TMB,尤其是在免疫编辑程度低的黑色素瘤和异质性NSCLC中。在免疫编辑肿瘤中的较差表现提示,在这些情境下免疫逃逸机制可能主导ICI应答。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Cancer immunotherapy has transformed treatment, yet response rates remain suboptimal. Immunogenic neoantigens-tumor-specific peptides eliciting T-cell responses-represent promising biomarkers, but current predictors have critical limitations: they focus predominantly on MHC-I while neglecting MHC-I/II coordination, and rely on tumor mutation burden (TMB), which lacks immunogenicity specificity and ignores tumor heterogeneity. We developed NeoPrecis, a computational framework integrating immunogenicity prediction with tumor subclonal architecture to improve immunotherapy response prediction. Methods: NeoPrecis comprises two modules capturing mutation-centric and tumor-centric immunogenic contexts. NeoPrecis-Immuno models wild-type to mutant peptide distance to estimate T-cell recognition likelihood, incorporating amino acid embeddings, MHC-binding motifs, positional factors, and peptide sequences. The model was pre-trained on TCR-binding data for peptide-TCR cross-reactivity discrimination, then fine-tuned on T-cell assay data. NeoPrecis-Landscape integrates MHC-I and MHC-II immunogenicity predictions with PyClone-inferred subclonal structure. For each subclone, immunogenicity is computed as the product of its MHC-I and MHC-II scores. Tumor-level immunogenicity is then calculated as the weighted average of all subclonal scores, with weights determined by subclone prevalence. Results: NeoPrecis-Immuno outperformed PRIME, ICERFIRE, and DeepNeo on an independent gastrointestinal cancer dataset with validated CD4+/CD8+ T-cell assays. Its interpretable architecture quantifies allele-specific contributions via allele benefit scores, which showed significant prognostic associations in melanoma (p=0.04) and NSCLC (p=0.01) independent of specific mutations. Across five melanoma and three NSCLC cohorts, NeoPrecis-Landscape outperformed TMB in stratifying ICI responders, particularly in melanoma and heterogeneous NSCLCs. Homogeneous, heavily immunoedited NSCLCs (predominantly smoker tumors) showed reduced neoantigen-based predictive power. Conclusion: NeoPrecis provides an interpretable framework for neoantigen immunogenicity assessment. By integrating tumor subclonal structure, it outperforms TMB in predicting ICI response, especially in melanoma and heterogeneous NSCLCs with low immunoediting. Poor performance in immunoedited tumors suggests immune evasion mechanisms may dominate ICI response in these contexts.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Lee, None.. T. Sears, None. M. Zanetti, Invectys Inc advisor to the board. H. K. Carter, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索