PO.MCB02.01 · 分子与细胞生物学

整合实时阻抗与荧光成像以表征NETosis

Integrated real-time impedance and fluorescence imaging to characterize NETosis

海报缩略图:整合实时阻抗与荧光成像以表征NETosis
编号 4675 展板 24 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 20 主讲 Xiaoyu Zhang, PhD
分会场 Cell Death Regulation and Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tian Wang1, Xiaoyu Zhang2, Grace Yang1, Peifang Ye1, Nancy Li2

1Agilent Technologies, Hangzhou, China,2Agilent Technologies, La Jolla, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
NETosis是中性粒细胞死亡的一种特殊形式,其特征是释放网状DNA结构及相关蛋白,即中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网(NETs)。有两条主要途径介导NETosis:(1)经典的"自杀性"NETosis,涉及NET释放后的细胞裂解,通常在3-4小时内发生,并依赖于经NADPH氧化酶产生的活性氧(ROS);(2)"活性"NETosis,其中NETs在1-2小时内通过囊泡挤出,而细胞保持完整。NETosis在宿主防御和疾病中发挥双重作用,既参与抗菌免疫,也参与病理性炎症、血栓形成和自身免疫。在本研究中,对分化的中性粒细胞样HL-60细胞(dHL-60)和原代人中性粒细胞使用了一小组化合物进行处理:PMA,可触发自杀性NETosis;A23187,一种诱导快速活性NETosis的药理学试剂;以及喜树碱,一种凋亡性化合物。为可视化NET形成,将细胞培养于含eTox Green(一种膜不可透过的DNA结合染料)的培养基中。通过阻抗读数(以细胞指数报告)和活细胞成像,在xCELLigence RTCA eSight系统上同步连续监测形态和生理变化。我们的结果显示:(1)DNA结合染料染色的程度可区分凋亡与NETosis,NETosis诱导剂PMA和A23187产生的绿色荧光面积大于凋亡试剂喜树碱,反映出挤出的NETs显著大于细胞核;(2)基于ROS依赖性,可区分PMA诱导的自杀性NETosis与A23187触发的活性NETosis——在PMA处理后,NET释放被NADPH氧化酶抑制剂DPI完全抑制,而在A23187暴露后则不被抑制。其他区别还包括A23187处理时NET挤出起始更早,以及PMA刺激后(而非A23187处理后)发生中性粒细胞死亡;(3)PMA诱导的NETosis与从悬浮状态向贴壁状态的转变相关,该转变通过阻抗测量得到监测和定量。总之,这种实时、非侵入性的阻抗-成像方法能够可视化NETosis,通过荧光成像定量NET释放动力学,并通过阻抗测量监测中性粒细胞在悬浮与贴壁状态之间的转变。这一整合方法为NETosis机制研究、药物筛选应用以及对中性粒细胞驱动病理的更广泛研究提供了一个稳健而通用的平台。
查看英文原文 English abstract
NETosis is a specialized form of neutrophil cell death characterized by the release of web-like DNA structures and associated proteins, known as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Two main pathways mediate NETosis¹ , ²: (1) classical “suicidal” NETosis, which involves cell lysis following NET release, typically occurs within 3-4 hours and depends on reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation via NADPH oxidase; and (2) “vital” NETosis, where NETs are extruded through vesicles within 1-2 hours while the cell remains intact. NETosis plays a dual role in host defense and disease, contributing to antimicrobial immunity as well as pathological inflammation, thrombosis, and autoimmunity³. In this study, differentiated neutrophil-like HL-60 (dHL-60) and primary human neutrophils were treated with a small set of compounds: PMA, which triggers suicidal NETosis; A23187, a pharmacological agent that induces rapid, vital NETosis; and camptothecin, an apoptotic compound. To visualize NET formation, the cells were cultured in media containing eTox Green, a membrane-impermeable DNA-binding dye. The morphological and physiological changes were continuously monitored via both impedance readout, reported as Cell Index, and live-cell imaging simultaneously on an xCELLigence RTCA eSight system. Our results show that: (1) the extent of DNA-binding dye staining distinguished apoptosis from NETosis, with NETosis inducers PMA and A23187 producing larger green fluorescence areas than the apoptotic agent camptothecin, reflecting that extruded NETs are substantially larger than nuclei; (2) suicidal NETosis induced by PMA was differentiated from vital NETosis triggered by A23187 based on ROS dependency-NET release was completely inhibited by DPI, an NADPH oxidase blocker, after PMA treatment but not after A23187 exposure. Additional distinctions included earlier onset of NET extrusion with A23187 and neutrophil death following PMA stimulation but not A23187 treatment; and (3) PMA-induced NETosis was associated with a transition from suspension to adherent states, which was monitored and quantified by impedance measurements. In conclusion, this real-time, noninvasive impedance-imaging approach enables visualization of NETosis, quantification of NET release kinetics via fluorescence imaging, and monitoring of neutrophil transitions between suspension and adherent states through impedance measurements. This integrated method provides a robust and versatile platform for mechanistic NETosis studies, drug-screening applications, and broader investigations into neutrophil-driven pathologies.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Wang, None.. X. Zhang, None.. G. Yang, None.. P. Ye, None.. N. Li, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索