PO.TB10.08 · 肿瘤生物学
TNBC微环境的单细胞空间蛋白质组分析定义基因型特异性特征
A single-cell spatial proteomic analysis of the TNBC microenvironment defines genotype-specific features
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
携带胚系BRCA1/2致病变异(gBRCA1/2)的女性乳腺癌通常采用铂类治疗和PARP抑制剂(PARPi),但耐药常见发生。由于gBRCA1三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的肿瘤微环境(TME)富含肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)和CD8 T细胞,已开展将PARPi与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合用于BRCA1 TNBC的治疗试验。该联合方案尚未显示比单用PARPi更有效。评估gBRCA1/2 TNBC的TME可能有助于识别最可能从PARPi/ICI治疗中获益的肿瘤。我们进行了详细的空间蛋白质组分析,采用空间组织多重成像(PhenoCycler)表征gBRCA1/2和野生型(WT)TNBC患者的肿瘤-免疫细胞相互作用,包括101例gBRCA1、24例gBRCA2和30例WT TNBC,并对34例gBRCA1、8例gBRCA2和16例WT TNBC进行了配对RNAseq。开发了一个43-plex抗体面板,涵盖DNA损伤与修复、免疫亚型和耗竭标志物。我们在全部三个队列中检测到处于S/G2期(Geminin+)、具有双链DNA断裂(yH2AX+)和DNA修复能力(RAD51+)的单个肿瘤细胞(PANCK+)。与WT TNBC相比,gBRCA1/2 TNBC患者具有同源重组功能完备(HRP)的肿瘤细胞比例显著更低(gBRCA1 p = 0.006;gBRCA2 p = 0.007)。在WT和gBRCA1/2 TNBC中,CD4和CD8 T细胞及CD20 B细胞的DNA修复功能完好。gBRCA1相比WT TNBC,CD8+ T细胞(p=0.016)和CD20 B细胞(p=0.003)的频率显著更高;BRCA2与WT TNBC无差异。对CD8 T细胞的详细表征显示,与WT TNBC相比,BRCA1(TOX,p<0.0001;LAG-3,p=0.028;PD-1,p=0.033)和BRCA2(LAG-3,p=0.033)中潜在功能障碍的CD8 T细胞数量显著增加。我们在gBRCA1 TNBC中观察到两种类型的TME:1)CD8低型(均值<9.38%),免疫检查点(PD-1)表达升高1.4倍(均值:15.4%),肿瘤细胞DNA损伤高;2)CD8高型(>9.38%),PD-1降低,肿瘤细胞DNA损伤低。我们的发现表明,尽管gBRCA1/2变异导致肿瘤细胞DNA损伤和修复受损,T细胞(CD4、CD8)和B细胞(CD20)仍保留完整的DNA修复机制。我们还发现,gBRCA1/2 TNBC在CD8 T细胞上的免疫检查点蛋白LAG-3和PD-1水平高于WT TNBC。这一发现提示在PD-L1阻断之外,额外使用ICI(LAG-3、PD-1)的潜在效用。重要的是,gBRCA1相关TNBC患者呈现两种不同的TME,提示对ICI和DNA损伤类治疗的反应在不同肿瘤间可能存在差异,且可在治疗前预判。明确初治TME对于为BRCA突变TNBC个体设计个性化、靶向的ICI策略至关重要。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Breast cancer in women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (g BRCA1 / 2 ) are generally treated with platinum-based therapies and PARP inhibitors (PARPi) with resistance commonly emerging. As the tumor microenvironment (TME) in gBRCA1 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is enriched with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD8 T cells, treatment trials have been done combining PARPi and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in BRCA1 TNBC. This combination has not been shown to be more effective than PARPi alone. Evaluating the TME in gBRCA1 / 2 TNBC may help identify tumors most likely to benefit from PARPi/ICI therapy. We performed a detailed spatial proteomic analysis to characterize tumor-immune cell interactions in patients with gBRCA1/2 and wild-type (WT) TNBC with spatial tissue multiplexing (PhenoCycler) in 101 g BRCA1 , 24 g BRCA2 , and 30 WT TNBCs with matched RNAseq for 34 g BRCA1 , 8 g BRCA2 , and 16 WT TNBCs. A 43-plex antibody panel was developed featuring markers of DNA damage and repair, immune subtypes and exhaustion. We detected single tumor cells (PANCK+) in S/G2 phase (Geminin+) with double-stranded DNA breaks (yH2AX+) and DNA repair capacity (RAD51+) across all three cohorts. g BRCA1/2 TNBC patients exhibited a significantly lower proportion of tumor cells with homologous recombination proficiency (HRP) (g BRCA1 p = 0.006; g BRCA2 p = 0.007) compared to WT TNBC. CD4 & CD8 T cells, and CD20 B cells had intact DNA repair in WT and g BRCA1 / 2 TNBC. The frequency of CD8+ T (p=0.016) and CD20 B (p=0.003) cells was significantly higher in g BRCA1 compared to WT TNBC; BRCA2 and WT TNBC showed no differences. A detailed characterization of CD8 T cells revealed significantly increased numbers of potentially dysfunctional CD8 T cells in BRCA1 (TOX, p<0.0001; LAG-3, p=0.028; PD-1, p=0.033) and BRCA2 (LAG-3, p=0.033) compared to WT TNBC. We observed two types of TMEs in g BRCA1 TNBC: 1) CD8 low (mean<9.38%) with 1.4-fold increased immune checkpoint (PD-1) expression (mean: 15.4%) and high DNA damage in tumor cells; and 2) CD8 high (>9.38%) with reduced PD-1 and low DNA damage in tumor cells. Our findings suggest that although g BRCA1/2 variants lead to DNA damage and impaired repair in tumor cells, T cells (CD4, CD8) and B cells (CD20) retain intact DNA repair mechanisms. We also found that g BRCA1/2 TNBCs exhibit higher levels of immune checkpoint proteins LAG-3 and PD-1 on CD8 T cells compared to WT TNBC. This finding suggests the potential utility of additional ICI (LAG-3, PD-1) beyond PD-L1 blockade. Importantly, patients with g BRCA1 -associated TNBC exhibit two different TMEs, suggesting that the response to ICI- and DNA-damaging-based therapies may differ between tumors, and anticipated prior to treatment. Defining treatment-naïve TME is crucial for designing personalized, targeted ICI strategies for individuals with BRCA -mutated TNBC.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Pueschl, None..
D. Bragen, None..
J. Lin, None..
A. Nayak, None..
D. A. Oldridge, None..
K. Bennett, None..
V. Fang, None..
P. A. James, None..
P. L. Mai, None..
S. H. Teo, None..
A. Antoniou, None..
G. Chenevix-Trench, None..
E. J. Wherry, None..
S. M. Domchek, None..
K. L. Nathanson, None.