LBPO.PS01 · 人群科学 · Late-Breaking

理解突变图谱的起源

Understanding the origins of the mutational landscape

海报缩略图:理解突变图谱的起源
编号 LB372 展板 2 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 55 主讲 Alexandra Keidel, BS;PhD
分会场 Late-Breaking Research: Population Sciences
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Alexandra Keidel1, Jazmine Virzi1, Mina McKee1, Mu-Rong Chao2, Chiung-Wen Hu3, Ludmil Alexandrov4, Gunnar Boysen5, Marcus Cooke1

1University of South Florida, Tampa, FL,2Chung Shan Medical University, Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Taichung, Taiwan,3Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Taichung, Taiwan,4University of California San Diago, La Jolla, CA,5University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
暴露组中的化学致癌物是癌症风险的重要促成因素,但将暴露与突变及肿瘤发生联系起来的分子机制尚未完全阐明。癌症生物学中的一个核心挑战是界定哪些化学诱导的DNA损伤以及如何被转化为驱动恶性转化的稳定突变图谱。本项目的长期目标是通过整合细胞核酸加合物组学与长读长Nanopore测序及单分子双链测序,阐明暴露驱动的突变特征的起源,从而在DNA损伤、修复和突变之间建立直接的分子级联系。作为这一工作的基础,我们将借鉴此前使用苯暴露模型开展的大量工作。我们在小鼠暴露于1:1摩尔比的12C6和13C6-苯混合物后,界定了DNA修复正常和缺陷小鼠的尿核酸加合物组,证明预期的和新型的化学特异性DNA加合物可在体内被检测和鉴定,且加合物负荷和组成随性别和DNA修复能力而变化。这些发现凸显了采用靶向技术限制加合物负荷评估分析的传统方法的局限性。我们的研究确立了高通量稳定同位素核酸加合物组学分析作为理解暴露组生物学影响工具的生物学相关性和技术可行性。在此框架基础上,我们启动了针对与肝细胞癌有明确相关性的肝脏致癌物(包括三氯丙烷[TCP]和呋喃)的初步研究。雄性和雌性B6C3F1/N野生型小鼠连续五天给予1:1比例的同位素标记毒素(30 mg/mL),随后采集组织进行下游分子分析。虽然稳定同位素DNA加合物组学和测序分析仍在进行中,但早期生理学终点指标显示对暴露有可测量的生理反应。雄性小鼠在TCP暴露后平均体重下降约1.9%,呋喃暴露后下降约2.8%,与急性毒理学应激一致。通过将核酸加合物组学与新一代长读长和双链测序相结合,本工作旨在建立一个平台,用于界定致癌物诱导突变的分子起源,并推进对暴露驱动的癌症风险的机制理解。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Chemical carcinogens in the exposome are a significant contributor to cancer risk, yet the molecular mechanisms linking exposure to mutation and tumorigenesis are not fully resolved. A central challenge in cancer biology is defining which and how chemically-induced DNA damage is converted into stable mutational landscapes that drive malignant transformation. The long-term objective of this project is to elucidate the origins of exposure-driven mutational signatures by integrating cellular nucleic acid adductomics with long-read Nanopore sequencing and single-molecule duplex sequencing, enabling direct, molecule-level connections between DNA damage, repair, and mutation. As a foundation for this effort, we will draw on our extensive prior work using benzene exposure models. We defined the urinary nucleic acid adductome in DNA repair proficient and deficient mice following exposure to a 1:1 M cocktail of 12 C 6 and 13 C 6 - benzene, demonstrating that expected and novel chemical-specific DNA adducts can be detected and identified in vivo and that adduct burden and composition varies with sex, and DNA repair capacity. These findings underscore the limitations of conventional approaches that restrict analysis of adduct burden assessment using targeted techniques. Our study establishes both the biological relevance and technical feasibility of high-throughput stable isotope nucleic acid adductomic profiling as a tool to understand the biological impact of the exposome. Building on this framework, we initiated pilot studies examining liver carcinogens with established relevance to hepatocellular carcinoma, including trichloropropane (TCP) and furan. Male and female B6C3F1/N wild-type mice were dosed with a 1:1 ratio of isotopically labeled toxins for five consecutive days (30 mg/mL), followed by tissue collection for downstream molecular analyses. While stable isotope DNA adductomic and sequencing analyses are ongoing, early physiological endpoints indicate measurable physiological responses to exposure. Male mice exhibited mean body-weight losses of approximately 1.9% following TCP exposure and 2.8% following furan exposure, consistent with acute toxicological stress. By combining nucleic acid adductomics with next-generation long-read and duplex sequencing, this work aims to establish a platform for defining the molecular origins of carcinogen-induced mutations and advancing mechanistic understanding of exposure-driven cancer risk.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Keidel, None.. J. Virzi, None.. M. McKee, None.. M. Chao, None.. C. Hu, None.. L. Alexandrov, None.. G. Boysen, None.. M. Cooke, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索