PO.BCS01.05 · 生物信息与计算

液体和组织基因组分析中的拷贝数丢失和体细胞杂合性缺失检测

Copy number loss and somatic loss of heterozygosity calling in liquid- and tissue-based genomic profiling

海报缩略图:液体和组织基因组分析中的拷贝数丢失和体细胞杂合性缺失检测
编号 5443 展板 10 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 1 主讲 Adrian Bubie, BS;MS
分会场 Application of Bioinformatics to Cancer Biology 5
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Hao Wang1, Andrew Gross1, Adrian Bubie1, Lauren Lawrence1, Reagan Barnett1, Bernard Herman1, Matthew Ellis1, Tingting Jiang2

1Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA,2Guardant Health, San Diego, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:拷贝数丢失(CNL)改变是常见的致癌驱动事件,对多种癌症类型的治疗选择和临床试验匹配具有重要意义。我们开发了一种CNL检测方法,将专门构建的panel与一个考虑倍性的多信号模型相结合,能够灵敏地从血浆和FFPE来源的样本中检测约1MB至染色体尺度的杂合性缺失(LoH)和纯合缺失(homdel)事件。 方法:我们采用了杂交捕获检测(Guardant360 Liquid和Guardant360 Tissue,Guardant Health,加州Palo Alto),其靶向700多个癌症相关基因,并纳入常见单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的密集平铺以优化分段分辨率。读取深度和SNP次要等位基因分数(MAF)在一个考虑倍性的似然框架内整合,该框架联合估计肿瘤分数(TF)、倍性和等位基因特异性拷贝数(CN)。高度多态的位点(如HLA)采用独特的靶标设计来处理,以在保留真实缺失的同时减轻多态性和伪影的影响。单一检测器可跨样本类型运行,并针对ctDNA和FFPE组织进行材料特异性调整。检测器性能的验证使用临床和人工配制的游离DNA(cfDNA)和基因组DNA(gDNA)样本的组合,建立了缺失检测限(LoD)、灵敏度、特异性和空白限(LoB)。 结果:联合肿瘤分数(TF)/CNL推断减少了错误检测,并改善了低TF下多倍体基因组中等位基因特异性状态的分配。CNL可报告范围扩展至>500个基因,包括对HLA位点、同源重组(HRR)和DNA错配修复(MMR)通路的覆盖。LoD在cfDNA中确立为20% TF,在组织来源gDNA中为30%,并且LoB显示出每样本假阳性率<5%。两种分析物在整个可报告范围内均显示出≥90%的灵敏度,临床精密度在LoD以上样本中确立为≥90%的阳性百分比一致性(PPA)。HLA缺失检测虽已知在技术上具有挑战性,但显示出与其他基因相似的整体性能。在来自晚期癌症患者的117k份血浆和43k份组织样本中,该方法在10.8%(血浆)和18.6%(组织)的病例中产生了可报告的缺失,大幅提高了诊断产出。 结论:我们证明,考虑倍性和TF的缺失检测器方法能够灵敏而准确地检测CNL,无论基因身份如何,包括在传统上难以定位的区域(如HLA位点),并适用于cfDNA和gDNA两种输入。这一能力是现代综合基因组分析的关键组成部分,后者必须包含对临床相关拷贝数改变的稳健检测,以更好地为癌症治疗决策提供信息。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Copy number loss (CNL) alterations are common oncogenic driver events important for therapy selection and clinical trial matching in several cancer types. We developed a CNL detection approach that pairs a purpose-built panel with a ploidy-aware, multi-signal model to sensitively detect loss of heterozygosity (LoH) and homozygous deletion (homdel) events from ~1MB to chromosome scale in both plasma- and FFPE-derived samples. Method: We employed hybrid-capture assays (Guardant360 Liquid and Guardant360 Tissue, Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA) that target more than 700 cancer-associated genes and incorporate a dense tiling of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to optimize segmentation resolution. Read depth and SNP minor allele fraction (MAF) are integrated within a ploidy-aware likelihood framework that jointly estimates tumor fraction (TF), ploidy, and allele-specific copy number (CN). Highly polymorphic loci (e.g. HLA) are handled with a unique target design that mitigates polymorphism and artifacts while preserving true deletions. A single caller operates across specimen types, with material-specific adjustments for ctDNA and FFPE tissue. Validation of the caller performance established deletion limit of detection (LoD), sensitivity, specificity and limit of blank (LoB) using a combination of clinical and contrived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and genomic DNA (gDNA) samples. Result: Joint tumor fraction (TF)/CNL inference reduces miscalls and improves allele-specific state assignment in polyploid genomes at low TF. The CNL reportable range extends to >500 genes including coverage of the HLA locus, homologous recombination (HRR) and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathways. LoD was established at 20% TF in cfDNA and 30% in tissue-derived gDNA, and LoB was demonstrated with a per-sample false positive rate of <5%. Both analytes demonstrated ≥90% sensitivity across the reportable range, and clinical precision established at ≥90% PPA for samples above LoD. HLA deletion calling, while known to be technically challenging, demonstrated similar overall performance to other genes. Among 117k plasma and 43k tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer, this method yielded reportable deletion 10.8% (plasma) and 18.6% (tissue) cases, substantially improving diagnostic yield. Conclusion: We demonstrate that ploidy- and TF-aware deletion caller approach sensitively and accurately detects CNLs irrespective of gene identity, including in traditionally difficult-to-map regions like the HLA locus, in both cfDNA and gDNA inputs. This ability is a critical component of modern comprehensive genomic profiling, which must include robust detection of clinically relevant copy number alterations to better inform cancer treatment decisions.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Wang, Guardant Health Employment. A. Bubie, Guardant Health Inc Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Travel. L. Lawrence, Guardant Health Employment. R. Barnett, Guardant Health Employment. B. Herman, Guardant Health Employment. M. Ellis, Guardant Health Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索