PO.BCS01.05 · 生物信息与计算
利用整合空间转录组学的肿瘤微环境PK模型解析ADC载荷动力学
Decoding ADC payload dynamics with a spatial transcriptomics-integrated tumor microenvironment PK model
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:肿瘤微环境(TME)固有的异质性使得抗体药物偶联物(ADC)载荷递送及耐药机制的预测变得复杂。空间转录组学(ST)的出现实现了高分辨率的分子图谱分析,使得在TME内进行计算机模拟(in silico)药代动力学(PK)建模成为可能,可作为载荷递送的替代指标。本研究旨在开发一个TME-PK平台,进行临床前验证,并整合人类TME数据,以阐明如何在具有临床意义的场景中优化ADC载荷递送。
方法:我们开发了一个计算机模拟的TME-PK模型,其参数化基于ST(Visium/Visium HD)网格所衍生的靶点表达和内皮密度。通过求解映射到ST数据上的动力学方程,并纳入血管分布、连接子裂解酶活性及靶点表达模式,该模型能够以时间依赖的方式定量载荷分布。为验证这些发现,我们使用了接受荧光标记的西妥昔单抗(cetuximab)或帕尼单抗(panitumumab)的FaDu异种移植小鼠模型。分别在2小时和40小时收集肿瘤,用于分布成像和ST分析。随后,我们使用该模型模拟52例胃腺癌(STAD)患者在宽K D范围(pM至10 µM)内的载荷递送,以寻找最佳靶点及ADC特性范围。然后针对每例患者肿瘤的ST计算瘤内载荷的峰值浓度。
结果:TME-PK模型预测的2小时和40小时抗体分布与实验数据观察到的荧光强度显著相关(Spearman's rho > 0.65,p < 0.05)。随后评估了该模型中瘤内靶点表达水平与载荷递送对K D敏感性之间的关系,揭示出强正相关(Spearman's rho:0.94,p < 0.05)。对于高表达靶点(如CEACAM5),即使在中等结合亲和力(较高K D)下,载荷浓度也迅速饱和。然而,极高亲和力(低K D)会诱导强效的结合位点屏障,导致ADC在血管周围区域蓄积,阻碍其穿透至肿瘤核心。相反,对于低表达靶点(如NECTIN-4),极高亲和力(低K D)对于实现足够的载荷浓度和增强肿瘤核心递送至关重要。
结论:我们建立了一个空间分辨的TME-PK框架,并使用实验性异种移植数据进行了临床前验证。将其应用于STAD患者数据证实了已知的药理学现象,例如结合位点屏障效应。这表明TME-PK模型是优化ADC载荷递送的关键工具,说明抗体的最佳动力学特性必须与靶点表达的空间模式及其与肿瘤微环境的关系相平衡,以确保结合与组织穿透兼备。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: The inherent heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) complicates the prediction of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) payload delivery and the mechanism of resistance. The advent of spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables high-resolution molecular profiling, allowing in silico pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling within the TME as a proxy for payload delivery. This study aimed to develop a TME-PK platform, validate it preclinically, and integrate human TME data to inform how ADC payload delivery can be optimized in clinically relevant settings.
Method: We developed an in silico TME-PK model parameterized using target expression and endothelial density derived from ST (Visium/Visium HD) grids. It enables quantification of payload distribution in a time-dependent manner by solving kinetic equations mapped onto ST data, incorporating vessel distribution, linker-cleavage enzymatic activity, and target expression patterns. To validate these findings, we used a FaDu xenograft mouse model that received either fluorescently labeled cetuximab or panitumumab. Tumors were collected at two and 40 hours for distribution imaging and ST. We then used the model to simulate payload delivery in 52 stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) patients across a wide K D range (pM to 10 µM) to find optimal targets and range of ADC characteristics. The peak concentration of the intratumoral payload was then calculated for each ST of the patient tumor.
Results: The 2 and 40-hour antibody distribution predicted by the TME-PK model correlated significantly with observed fluorescence intensity from experimental data (Spearman's rho > 0.65, p < 0.05). The model was then evaluated for the relationship between intratumoral target expression levels and the sensitivity of payload delivery to K D , revealing a strong positive correlation (Spearman's rho: 0.94, p < 0.05). For highly expressed targets (e.g., CEACAM5), payload concentration rapidly saturated even at modest binding affinities (higher K D ). However, very high affinity (low K D ) induced a potent binding-site barrier, causing ADC accumulation in perivascular regions and preventing tumor core penetration. Conversely, for low-expression targets (e.g., NECTIN-4), a very high affinity (low K D ) was essential to achieve adequate payload concentration and enhanced tumor core delivery.
Conclusion: We established a spatially-resolved TME-PK framework, which was validated preclinically using experimental xenograft data. Its application to STAD patient data confirmed known pharmacological phenomena, such as the binding-site barrier effect. This demonstrates the TME-PK model as a crucial tool for optimizing ADC payload delivery, showing that the optimal kinetic properties of antibody must be balanced against the spatial patterns of target expression and relationship with tumor microenvironment to ensure both binding and tissue penetration.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Bae,
Portrai, Inc. Employment.
J. Park,
Portrai, Inc. Employment.
J. Choi,
Portrai, Inc. Employment.
D. Lee,
Portrai, Inc. Stock.
H. Im,
Portrai, Inc. Stock.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Employment.
H. Choi,
Portrai, Inc. Stock.
Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Employment.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea Employment.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea Employment.