PO.CL05.13 · 临床研究

膀胱癌中免疫治疗相比化疗的早期无进展生存不利:一项随机试验的荟萃分析

Unfavorable early progression-free survival of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy in bladder cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

海报缩略图:膀胱癌中免疫治疗相比化疗的早期无进展生存不利:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
编号 6690 展板 1 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 49 主讲 Donghwi Choi, MD
分会场 Vaccines and Other Immunomodulatory Agents
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Donghwi Choi, Hangyul Lee, Jinha Kim, Young Kwang Chae

Northwestern Univ. Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:铂类化疗长期以来一直是晚期尿路上皮癌的一线标准治疗。然而,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的问世推动了评估其作为初始治疗适用性的努力,尤其是在PD-L1高表达或无法耐受顺铂的患者中。随机对照试验(RCT)的早期结果提示,与化疗相比,仅用ICI的方案可能产生较差的短期无进展生存(PFS),这可能是由于免疫激活延迟、缺乏快速的肿瘤缩小,或在部分病例中出现超进展性疾病。为表征这种时间依赖性的疗效模式,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较晚期膀胱癌中仅用ICI方案与化疗的效果。 方法:通过对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行全面检索,鉴定出比较晚期膀胱癌一线仅用ICI方案(Durvalumab、Durvalumab+Tremelimumab、Pembrolizumab)与铂类化疗的II-III期RCT。仅纳入专门在一线治疗背景下开展的研究。提取并数字化合格试验的Kaplan-Meier PFS曲线,并使用Guyot算法重建患者个体水平的生存数据。由汇总数据生成合并的Kaplan-Meier估计值,并在第3、6、9和12个月计算比较免疫治疗与化疗的风险比(HR)值,以评估治疗效应随时间的变化。HR通过两阶段荟萃分析获得,纳入研究特异性权重以考虑各试验间样本量和方差的差异。 结果:两项RCT中的三种免疫治疗方案符合纳入标准。与化疗相比,仅用ICI方案显示出较差的早期PFS结局,第3个月的HR为4.08(95% CI,2.85–5.82),第6个月为2.87(2.23–3.70),第9个月为2.05(1.80–2.33),第12个月为1.92(1.63–2.25)。HR在整个12个月期间逐渐下降,表明生存轨迹缓慢趋同。合并的KM曲线显示,与化疗相比,免疫治疗的短期获益减少,但随着随访时间延长而逐渐改善,并最终在第10个月发生交叉。 结论:在晚期膀胱癌中,一线仅用ICI方案在早期阶段相对于化疗表现较差。随着随访延长,生存率缓慢改善,并在约第10个月KM曲线交叉时获益显现。这些发现强调了需要警惕的早期评估,并支持采用联合或序贯治疗策略,以抵消早期进展同时保留长期免疫获益。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Platinum-based chemotherapy has long served as the first-line standard for advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has spurred efforts to evaluate their suitability as initial therapy, especially in patients with strong PD-L1 expression or those who cannot tolerate cisplatin. Early results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that ICI-only regimens may produce inferior short-term progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy, potentially due to delayed immune activation, lack of rapid tumor shrinkage, or hyperprogressive disease in select cases. To characterize this time-dependent efficacy pattern, we performed a meta-analysis comparing ICI-only regimen with chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified phase II-III RCTs comparing first-line ICI-only regimen(Durvalumab, Durvalumab+Tremelimumab, Pembrolizumab) and platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer. Studies conducted exclusively in first-line treatment settings were selected for inclusion. Kaplan-Meier PFS curves from eligible trials were extracted and digitized, and reconstructed patient-level survival data were generated using the Guyot algorithm. Combined Kaplan-Meier estimates were produced from pooled data, and hazard ratio (HR) values comparing immunotherapy with chemotherapy were calculated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to evaluate temporal changes in treatment effect. HRs were obtained through two-stage meta-analysis, incorporating study-specific weights to account for differences in sample size and variance across trials. Results: Three immunotherapy regimens in two RCTs met the inclusion criteria. ICI-only regimens demonstrated worse early PFS outcomes compared to chemotherapy, with HRs of 4.08(95% CI, 2.85-5.82) at 3 months, 2.87(2.23-3.70) at 6 months, 2.05(1.80-2.33) at 9 months and 1.92(1.63-2.25) at 12 months. HRs gradually decreased throughout the 12-month period, indicating slow convergence of survival trajectories. Pooled KM curves showed that immunotherapy exhibited reduced short-term benefit compared to chemotherapy that gradually improved with longer follow-up and ultimately crossed over at 10 months. Conclusion: In advanced bladder cancer, first-line ICI-only regimen underperforms relative to chemotherapy in the early phase. Survivability slowly improves with follow-up and benefits are apparent around 10 months as the KM curves cross over. These findings underscore the need for vigilant early assessment and support combination or sequential treatment strategies to offset early progression while preserving long-term immunologic benefit.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Choi, None.. H. Lee, None.. J. Kim, None. Y. Chae, AbbVie ). Bristol Myers Squibb ). Biodesix ). Freenome ). Predicine ). Tempus ). Imagine AI ). Picture Health ). Oncohost ). Regeneron ). Roche/Genentech Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. AstraZeneca Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Foundation Medicine Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Neogenomics Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Guardant Health Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Boehringer Ingelheim Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Biodesix Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. ImmuneOncia Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Lilly Oncology Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Merck Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索