PO.ET02.09 · 实验与分子治疗
利用单细胞多组学实现分化治疗的可推广方法
Leveraging single-cell multiomics for a generalizable approach to differentiation therapy
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
在癌症治疗所用的各类系统性疗法中,分化治疗或许是最不常使用但通常最能耐受的治疗形式,其目标是使癌细胞回归其偏离的发育路径,通过多种机制导致细胞死亡。急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)是分化治疗的典范,其中停滞于祖细胞样状态的白血病原始细胞在经全反式维甲酸(ATRA)和三氧化二砷治疗后被诱导继续其髓系分化,使治愈率 >95%。与 APL 相比,其他类型的急性髓系白血病(AML)的 5 年生存率仅约 33%。然而,针对具有 IDH1/2(异柠檬酸脱氢酶 1 和 2)、NPM1(核仁磷酸蛋白 1)和 KMT2A(赖氨酸甲基转移酶 2A)改变的 AML 采用新型诱导分化药物的靶向治疗近期进展,已在年龄较大、体弱或复发/难治性疾病患者中显示出疗效。然而,诱导分化的潜在机制仍未完全阐明,限制了其在其他 AML 亚型或非血液系统疾病中的应用。建立一种发现分化治疗调控因子的合理方法可加速这类药物的开发。在此,我们提出一个用于发现分化中枢调控因子的平台,以此作为识别下游治疗开发靶点的手段。以 IDH1/2 突变(IDHm)AML 临床样本的单细胞多组学(RNA-seq 和 ATAC-seq——scMultiome)数据作为测试案例,我们利用名为 CellOracle 的软件包来剖析在 IDH 抑制过程中支撑分化反应的基因调控网络(GRN)。通过这些分析,我们重现了 IDHm AML 中已知的“BRCA 样”(BRCAness)模式,其中 BRCA1(乳腺癌基因 1)的计算机模拟敲除似乎支持 IDH 抑制的分化效应。我们还发现了包括数个 Ikaros 转录因子在内的推定的、迄今尚未鉴定的分化表型调控因子。借助这一新平台,我们还试图在实体瘤类型中识别分化治疗靶点——在实体瘤中,分化治疗的实例几乎完全缺乏,唯一值得注意的例外是 ATRA 用于神经母细胞瘤。我们利用了脑桥 H3K27M 弥漫性中线胶质瘤的 scMultiome 数据,已知这类肿瘤具有基于表观遗传学的终末分化抑制。这些侵袭性、毁灭性的脑癌几乎只影响学龄儿童,2 年死亡率约为 95%。使用同一分析流程,我们已识别出恶性向正常转变的数个推定调控因子,包括数个已知对正常神经胶质发育和维持癌症状态重要的基因。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Among the different types of systemic therapies used in cancer treatment, differentiation therapy, perhaps the least frequently utilized but typically most tolerable form of treatment, aims to set cancer cells back on the developmental path from which they strayed, leading to cell death through multiple mechanisms. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is the exemplar for differentiation therapy wherein leukemic blasts arrested in a progenitor-like state are induced to continue their myeloid differentiation after treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide, resulting in >95% cure rates. In contrast to APL, other types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have only a 5-year survival of ~33%. However, recent advances in targeted therapies with novel, differentiation-inducing agents for AML with alterations in IDH1/2 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2) , NPM1 (nucleophosmin 1) , and KMT2A ( lysine methyltransferase 2A ) have demonstrated efficacy in patients who are older, frail, or who have relapsed or refractory disease. However, the underlying mechanism of differentiation induction remains incompletely understood, limiting adoption for other AML subtypes or non-hematologic diseases. Establishing a rational means of discovering regulators of differentiation therapy could accelerate development of this class of drugs. Here, we present a platform for discovering the central regulators of differentiation as a means of identifying targets for downstream therapeutic development. Using single-cell multiomic (RNA- and ATAC-seq - scMultiome) data from clinical samples of IDH1/2 -mutated (IDHm) AML as a test case, we utilized a software package called CellOracle to dissect the gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) underpinning the differentiation response throughout the course of IDH inhibition. With these analyses, we recapitulated a known pattern of “BRCAness” in IDHm AML with in silico knockout of BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) appearing to support the differentiation effect of IDH inhibition . We also discovered putative as-yet unidentified regulators of the differentiation phenotype including several Ikaros transcription factors. With this new platform, we also sought to identify targets for differentiation therapy in a solid tumor type, wherein examples of differentiation therapy are almost entirely lacking, with the noteworthy exception of ATRA for neuroblastoma. We utilized scMultiome data from H3K27M diffuse midline gliomas of the pons, which are known to have an epigenetically-based inhibition of terminal differentiation. These aggressive and devastating brain cancers affect exclusively school-aged children and have an approximately 95% 2-year mortality. Using the same pipeline we have identified several putative regulators of a malignant-to-normal transition, including several genes known to be important to normal glial development and maintenance of the cancer state.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. C. Friedland,
Medscape, Inc Travel.
XLV and XBI Other Securities, ETFs.
Innovative Engagements ).
T. Ding, None..
G. Schweickart, None..
A. Mims, None..
K. Miller, None..
A. Rivaldi, None..
E. Garfinkle, None..
S. Benjamin, None..
J. Navarro, None..
M. Wedemeyer, None..
A. Eisfeld, None.