PO.ET02.09 · 实验与分子治疗

肿瘤药物的药物敏感性分析揭示子宫平滑肌瘤亚型中的候选治疗靶点

Drug sensitivity profiling of oncology drugs reveals candidate therapeutic targets in uterine leiomyoma subtypes

海报缩略图:肿瘤药物的药物敏感性分析揭示子宫平滑肌瘤亚型中的候选治疗靶点
编号 481 展板 24 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 19 主讲 Helmiina Jarvi, MS
分会场 RNA, Gene and Cell Therapies, and Enabling Assay Technologies
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Helmiina Järvi1, Simona Bramante1, Juuli Raivola1, Emilia Piki2, Alice Dini2, Maija Jäntti1, Emma Siili3, Ralf Bützow3, Oskari Heikinheimo4, Annukka Pasanen3, Niko Välimäki1, Daniela Ungureanu2, Kristiina Rajamäki1, Lauri A. Aaltonen1

1Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,2Disease Networks Unit, Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland,3Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland,4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
子宫平滑肌瘤(UL)是良性平滑肌肿瘤,是育龄女性中最常见的肿瘤,全球影响高达80%的女性。虽然UL很少演变为恶性平滑肌肉瘤,但它们造成巨大的经济和社会负担。已知UL通过少数几种不同且互斥的遗传驱动事件产生,最常见的是MED12的热点突变和HMGA2的基因组重排。 目前,UL通常统一采用手术治疗,这是唯一的根治性选择。激素疗法可以减小肿瘤体积和缓解症状,但疗效和持续时间有限,且未考虑遗传亚类。因此,我们的目标是表征代表不同肿瘤亚型的UL来源原代细胞培养物中的药物反应。 我们建立了来自5个MED12和5个HMGA2异常UL及其匹配的正常肌层的患者来源原代细胞培养物。使用包含526种临床批准和在研癌症药物的综合化合物库进行了高通量药物敏感性和耐药性测试(DSRT)。 初步结果显示UL与匹配的肌层细胞之间的药物反应存在明显差异,包括不同的亚类特异性模式。药物反应谱的主成分分析和层次聚类将UL与正常组织区分开来,也与之前使用相同化合物库和DSRT工作流程分析的上皮性卵巢癌样本区分开来。 在针对UL和肌层测试的526种化合物中,根据设定为反应第80百分位数的药物敏感性评分(DSS)阈值,280种被认为在至少一个细胞培养样本中具有实质性效应。在这些化合物中,18%(N=50)对肿瘤细胞活力诱导了更强的效应,而82%(N=230)对肌层细胞的影响更大。在亚类水平上,84%的药物在MED12肿瘤中诱导的反应强于HMGA2。值得注意的是,抑制胰岛素样生长因子1受体(IGF1R)和磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶(PI3K)(这些在癌症中反复激活的通路)的化合物在UL细胞中产生了特别强的效应,且两种亚型之间的反应也各不相同。 迄今为止,针对UL的广泛药物发现工作尚未建立。尽管UL本质上是良性的,但它们与癌症共享失调的信号通路,使这些通路成为有吸引力的药物靶点。虽然我们认识到癌症药物通常具有显著的副作用,不能直接适用于UL治疗,但整合这些癌症药物方法可能有助于为UL开发有效的个性化疗法。此外,比较良性肿瘤和癌症中的药物反应,可能有助于阐明同一通路的改变如何导致不同的表型特征。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Uterine leiomyomas (ULs) are benign smooth muscle tumors and the most common neoplasms in reproductive aged women affecting up to 80% globally. Although ULs rarely evolve into malignant leiomyosarcomas, they inflict a huge financial and social burden. ULs are known to emerge through a few distinct mutually exclusive genetic driver events, the most common being a hotspot mutation in MED12 and genomic rearrangements of HMGA2 . Currently, ULs are often treated uniformly with surgery as the only curative option. Hormonal therapies can reduce tumor size and symptoms but are limited in efficacy and duration and do not consider the genetic subclass. Therefore, our aim was to characterize drug responses in UL-derived primary cell cultures representing the different tumor subtypes. We established patient-derived primary cell cultures from 5 MED12 and 5 HMGA2 aberrated ULs and their matched normal myometrium. High-throughput drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) was performed using a comprehensive compound library with 526 clinically approved and investigational cancer drugs. Preliminary results revealed clear differences in drug responses between ULs and matched myometrial cells, including distinct subclass-specific patterns. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering of drug response profiles separated ULs from normal tissue, as well as from epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analyzed using the same compound library and DSRT workflow. Among the 526 tested compounds for UL and myometrium, 280 were considered to have a substantial effect in at least one cell culture sample based on the drug sensitivity score (DSS) threshold set at 80th percentile of responses. Out of these compounds, 18% (N=50) induced stronger effects in tumor cell viability, while 82% (N=230) affected myometrial cells more. At the subclass level, 84% of drugs induced a stronger response in MED12 tumors compared to HMGA2. Notably, compounds inhibiting the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), pathways recurrently activated across cancers, produced particularly strong effects in the UL cells with also responses varying between the two subtypes. To date, broad drug discovery efforts for ULs have not been established. Despite their benign nature, ULs share dysregulated signaling pathways with cancers, making these pathways interesting drug targets. While we recognize that cancer drugs often have significant side effects and would not directly be suitable for UL treatment, integrating these cancer drug approaches could enable the development of effective personalized therapies for ULs. Moreover, comparison of drug responses in benign tumors and cancers could help to elucidate how alterations in the same pathways lead to different phenotypic characteristics.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Järvi, None.. S. Bramante, None.. J. Raivola, None.. E. Piki, None.. A. Dini, None.. M. Jäntti, None.. E. Siili, None.. R. Bützow, None.. O. Heikinheimo, None.. A. Pasanen, None.. N. Välimäki, None.. D. Ungureanu, None.. K. Rajamäki, None.. L. A. Aaltonen, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索