PO.ET06.05 · 实验与分子治疗
利用工程化PCMT1解码SCLC中ELAVL4的异天冬氨酰化:一种揭示免疫触发因素的策略
Decoding ELAVL4 isoaspartylation in SCLC using engineered PCMT1: A strategy for uncovering immune triggers
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
SCLC患者的5年生存率仅为9%——亟需新的治疗方法。约15%的SCLC患者会针对神经元蛋白胚胎致死异常视觉样蛋白4(ELAVL4)产生低滴度免疫应答,其生存期显著改善。在肺部,ELAVL4唯一表达于肺神经内分泌细胞,即SCLC的主要起源细胞。我们实验室先前的研究表明,抗ELAVL4免疫应答源自一种具有免疫原性的翻译后损伤,称为异天冬氨酰化。我们此前已将ELAVL4的异天冬氨酰化定位于RNA识别基序结构域(RRM1)上游的38个氨基酸的N端非结构化区域。异天冬氨酰化可发生在天冬酰胺和天冬氨酸残基上,最常见于它们位于柔性蛋白区域并后接一个小氨基酸(甘氨酸、丝氨酸或组氨酸)时。天冬酰胺或天冬氨酸侧链与主链发生反应,形成环状琥珀酰亚胺中间体,该中间体在70%的情况下解析为异天冬氨酸(isoAsp),从而使肽主链发生扭结。异天冬氨酰化在体内由蛋白-L-异天冬氨酸(D-天冬氨酸)O-甲基转移酶(PCMT1)修复。PCMT1缺陷在小鼠中无一例外地致死,说明该修复酶的必不可少的性质。PCMT1利用甲基供体S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(SAM)启动修复,产生S-腺苷同型半胱氨酸(SAH),后者可通过ELISA和生物发光测定进行定量。定位ELAVL4中的异天冬氨酰化位点至关重要,因为这将有助于识别用于设计未来针对SCLC患者的靶向免疫治疗的抗原表位。然而,由于天冬酰胺、天冬氨酸和异天冬氨酸残基之间分子量差异极小,异天冬氨酰化位点的定位具有挑战性。过去,氚标记的SAM曾与PCMT1联合使用以标记蛋白并检测异天冬氨酰化。在此,我们研究PCMT1能否与质谱联合使用,以甲基化并检测ELAV4中的异天冬氨酰化。该方法具有位点特异性并避免使用放射性。我们还将使用Bruker heliX生物传感器评估底物结合动力学。改进ELAVL4中异天冬氨酰化位点的检测与定位,有助于识别利用抗异天冬氨酰化ELAVL4应答的治疗靶点,用于SCLC的新型治疗。本研究由Robert E. and May R. Wright Foundation转化性癌症研究基金、USC本科生研究助理项目以及Norris综合癌症中心核心基金NIH/NCI P30CA014089资助。DAV和IAO是CaRE2癌症研究教育与参与健康中心的成员,该中心由NIH/NCI基金U54CA233396、U54CA233444和U54233465支持。
查看英文原文 English abstract
The 5-year survival rate for SCLC patients is only 9%-new therapies are urgently needed. Approximately 15% of SCLC patients develop a low-titer immune response against the neuronal protein embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like 4 (ELAVL4), exhibiting significantly improved survival. In the lung, ELAVL4 is uniquely expressed in pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, the primary cell of origin of SCLC. Prior research in our lab suggests that the anti-ELAVL4 immune response originates from an immunogenic type of post-translational damage called isoaspartylation. We previously mapped the isoaspartylation of ELAVL4 to the 38-amino acid N-terminal unstructured region, upstream of the RNA recognition motif domain (RRM1). Isoaspartylation can occur at asparagine and aspartic acid residues, most commonly when they are located in a flexible protein region and followed by a small amino acid (glycine, serine, or histidine). The asparagine or aspartate side chain reacts with the main chain, forming a cyclic succinimide intermediate that, in 70% of cases, resolves to an isoaspartate (isoAsp), thereby kinking the peptide backbone. Isoaspartylation is repaired by the enzyme protein-L-isoaspartate (D-aspartate) O-methyltransferase (PCMT1) in vivo. PCMT1 deficiency is invariably fatal in mice, illustrating the essential nature of this repair enzyme. PCMT1 utilizes the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to initiate repair, producing S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), which can be quantified via ELISA and bioluminescent assays. Mapping the isoaspartylation site(s) in ELAVL4 is essential, as this will help identify the antigenic epitope used to design future targeted immunotherapies for SCLC patients. However, mapping of isoaspartylation sites is challenging due to minimal molecular weight differences between asparagine, aspartate, and isoaspartate residues. In the past, tritiated SAM has been used in conjunction with PCMT1 to label proteins and detect isoaspartylation. Here, we investigate whether PCMT1 can be utilized in conjunction with mass spectrometry to methylate and detect isoaspartylation in ELAV4. This method is site-specific and avoids the use of radioactivity. We will also assess substrate binding kinetics using a Bruker heliX biosensor. Improved detection and mapping of isoaspartylation sites in ELAVL4 can help identify therapeutic targets that leverage the anti-isoaspartylated ELAVL4 response for new SCLC treatments. Supported by the Robert E. and May R. Wright Foundation Transformative Cancer Research Grant, USC's Undergraduate Research Associates Program, and the Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center core grant, NIH/NCI P30CA014089. DAV and IAO are members of CaRE2 the Cancer Research Education and Engagement Health Center, supported by NIH/NCI grants U54CA233396, U54CA233444, and U54233465.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Pan, None..
X. Zhou, None..
D. De Luna Moran, None..
C. Yan, None..
W. Cohn, None.