PO.IM01.09 · 免疫学
LBL-061:一种用于治疗多种实体瘤的新型EGFR×PD-L1靶向药物偶联物
LBL-061: A novel EGFR×PD-L1 targeted drug conjugate for the treatment of multiple solid tumors
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:EGFR在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和鼻咽癌(NPC)等多种实体瘤中过表达。新兴的靶向EGFR的抗体药物偶联物(ADC)已在临床试验中展现出初步的疗效和安全性。PD-L1是一种经临床验证的免疫检查点,在包括HNSCC和NSCLC在内的肿瘤中频繁过表达,并常与EGFR共表达。支持ADC与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合应用的临床证据为开发EGFR×PD-L1靶向ADC提供了理论依据。在此,我们介绍LBL-061的临床前开发,这是一种新型EGFR×PD-L1靶向ADC,由一个2:2形式的双特异性抗体通过我们自有的TOPiKinectics™连接子-载荷平台偶联而成。
方法:采用流式细胞术评估LBL-061对肿瘤细胞的细胞结合活性。采用Cell Counting-Lite发光细胞活力检测试剂盒评估LBL-061对肿瘤细胞和正常组织细胞的细胞毒性。采用PD-1/PD-L1报告基因检测系统评估LBL-061的PD-L1阻断活性。采用流式细胞术分析LBL-061的旁观者杀伤作用。在PBMC-肿瘤细胞共培养系统中评估LBL-061诱导肿瘤细胞免疫原性细胞死亡(ICD)的能力。在小鼠同基因模型和细胞系来源异种移植(CDX)模型中评估LBL-061的抗肿瘤活性。在食蟹猴剂量范围探索(DRF)研究中评估LBL-061的安全性和药代动力学(PK)。
结果:LBL-061对不同肿瘤细胞表现出强效的结合活性和细胞毒性,同时展现出强劲的PD-1/PD-L1阻断活性。在体外,LBL-061对表达PD-L1的树突状细胞(DC)和巨噬细胞的细胞毒性极低。在PBMC-肿瘤细胞共培养系统中,LBL-061诱导肿瘤细胞发生免疫原性细胞死亡(ICD),并对EGFR阴性肿瘤细胞介导强效的旁观者效应。在体内,LBL-061在同基因和异种移植小鼠模型中表现出更优的肿瘤生长控制能力。在为期6周的食蟹猴DRF研究中,重复静脉输注(Q3W给药)后,LBL-061耐受性良好,最高非严重毒性剂量(HNSTD)为40 mg/kg。在10至40 mg/kg剂量范围内,LBL-061在食蟹猴中表现出线性PK特征。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,新型双特异性EGFR×PD-L1靶向ADC LBL-061通过将直接细胞毒性与免疫激活相结合,产生协同抗肿瘤效应。它在食蟹猴中表现出良好的PK特征和安全性。总体而言,这些临床前数据强有力地表明LBL-061是一个值得进一步临床研究的有前景的候选药物。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: EGFR is overexpressed in multiple solid tumors such as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Emerging antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting EGFR have demonstrated preliminary efficacy and safety in clinical trials. PD-L1, a clinically validated immune checkpoint, is frequently overexpressed in tumors including HNSCC and NSCLC, where it is often co-expressed with EGFR. Clinical evidence supporting the combination of ADCs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provides a rationale for developing an EGFR×PD-L1-targeting ADC. Here, we describe the preclinical development of LBL-061, a novel EGFR×PD-L1-targeting ADC composed of a 2:2 format bispecific antibody conjugated via our proprietary TOPiKinectics TM linker-payload platform.
Methods: Cell binding activity of LBL-061 against tumor cells was assessed by flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity of LBL-061 against tumor cells and normal tissue cells was assessed by Cell Counting-Lite Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit. PD-L1 blocking activity of LBL-061 was evaluated using a PD-1/PD-L1 reporter gene assay system. Bystander killing of LBL-061 was analyzed by flow cytometry. LBL-061 induced tumor cells immunogenic cell death (ICD) was assessed in PBMC-tumor cells co-culture systems. The anti-tumor activity of LBL-061 was evaluated in mouse syngeneic and cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models. The safety profile and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LBL-061 were evaluated in a cynomolgus monkey dose-range finding (DRF) study.
Results: LBL-061 exhibited potent binding activity and cytotoxicity to different tumor cells. It also demonstrated robust PD-1/PD-L1 blocking activity. In vitro , LBL-061 showed minimal cytotoxicity to PD-L1 expressing dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages. In PBMC-tumor cells co-culture systems, LBL-061 induced tumor cells immunogenic cell death (ICD). It also mediated potent bystander effect on EGFR negative tumor cells. In vivo , LBL-061 showed superior control of tumors' growth in syngeneic and xenograft mouse models. In a 6-week cynomolgus DRF study, it was well tolerated with a highest non-severely toxic dose (HNSTD) of 40 mg/kg following repeated intravenous infusion (Q3W dosing). LBL-061 exhibited a linear PK characteristic in cynomolgus monkeys at doses ranging from 10 to 40 mg/kg.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that LBL-061, a novel bispecific EGFR×PD-L1-targeting ADC synergizes antitumor effects by combining direct cytotoxicity and immune activation. It showed a favorable PK profile and a good safety profile in cynomolgus monkeys. Taken together, these preclinical data strongly suggest that LBL-061 is a promising candidate worthy of further clinical investigation.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Qin,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Ye,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Dang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Tang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
P. Zhang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Zhu,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
S. Hu,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
M. Ye,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Liu,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Bao,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
H. Lin,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
W. Wang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
G. Wu,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Sun,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
H. Yuwen,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Lv,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Guan,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
M. Chen,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Zhao,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Zhu,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
C. Cai,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Huang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Kang,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.
H. Ling,
Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. Employment.