PO.MCB08.04 · 分子与细胞生物学

弥漫性胶质瘤中WHO 2021标准、WGS与DNA甲基化分类的诊断一致性:一项单中心队列研究

Diagnostic concordance of WHO 2021 standards, WGS, and DNA methylation classification in diffuse gliomas: A single-center cohort study

编号 5925 展板 13 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 21 主讲 Jungyu Kim, MD
分会场 Genetic and Transcriptomic Dissection of Cancer Evolution
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Jungyu Kim1, Yongjae Lee1, Jeong Seok Lee1, Tae Hoon Roh2, YOUNG SEOK JU1

1Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of,2Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:弥漫性胶质瘤表现出显著的临床和分子异质性。然而,WHO 2021临床诊断、全基因组测序(WGS)与基于DNA甲基化的分类之间在真实世界中的一致性仍有待充分阐明。 方法:我们回顾性分析了2013—2022年在Ajou大学医院接受治疗的111例胶质瘤患者。经过严格的质量控制(排除肿瘤分数<20%、样本混淆及仅复发的病例)后,93例患者(104个肿瘤)接受了WGS、酶法甲基化测序(EM-seq)和bulk RNA测序。临床诊断采用常规免疫组化和靶向panel测序更新至WHO 2021标准(星形细胞瘤,n=14;胶质母细胞瘤,n=76;少突胶质细胞瘤,n=14)。利用WGS根据IDH突变、TERT启动子突变、EGFR扩增以及7号染色体获得/10号染色体缺失来完善分类。甲基化类别(如GBM RTK I/II、Mesenchymal、MID、HGNET-BCOR)采用基于Illumina芯片数据(约20,000个CpG)训练的AI驱动分类器进行判定。我们评估了这三个层面的诊断一致性。 结果:在临床、WGS和甲基化各层面,IDH突变型星形细胞瘤和少突胶质细胞瘤的诊断一致性为100%。相比之下,在临床诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的病例中出现了差异。一例被重新分类为儿童型弥漫性半球胶质瘤,H3 G34突变型。另一例13岁患者的肿瘤携带复杂改变(ATRX、PTEN、TP53、PIK3R1、PTPRD、CDKN2A),被赋予了非GBM甲基化标签(CONTR/INFLAM),无法进行明确的亚分类。在经甲基化分类为GBM RTK I(9/10)、GBM RTK II(18/18)或Mesenchymal(15/16)的肿瘤中,几乎所有肿瘤均符合分子胶质母细胞瘤标准(IDH野生型、TERTp突变、EGFR扩增、chr7+/10-)。相反,MID及非GBM甲基化类别的肿瘤往往缺乏这些典型特征(17/21)。值得注意的是,WGS在一份具有HGNET-BCOR甲基化谱的样本中鉴定出BCOR::EP300易位——这是一种常规临床检测未能发现的融合——将BCOR改变的中枢神经系统肿瘤谱系拓展至经典内部串联重复之外。 结论:本单中心队列中整合的WGS与甲基化分析表明,基于DNA甲基化的分类可完善WHO 2021诊断,尤其是对常规诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的肿瘤。该方法能揭示罕见实体,如儿童型胶质瘤和BCOR改变型肿瘤,这些实体单靠靶向panel可能被遗漏。我们的研究结果支持采用多组学框架,以捕捉因有限分子标志物而被掩盖的生物学异质性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Diffuse gliomas exhibit significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity. However, the real-world concordance among WHO 2021 clinical diagnoses, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and DNA methylation-based classification remains to be fully characterized. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 111 glioma patients treated at Ajou University Hospital (2013-2022). Following strict quality control (excluding low tumor fraction <20%, sample swaps, and recurrent-only cases), 93 patients (104 tumors) underwent WGS, enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq), and bulk RNA sequencing. Clinical diagnoses were updated to WHO 2021 standards using routine immunohistochemistry and targeted panel sequencing (astrocytoma, n=14; glioblastoma, n=76; oligodendroglioma, n=14). WGS was utilized to refine classifications based on IDH mutation, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, and chromosome 7 gain/10 loss. Methylation classes (e.g., GBM RTK I/II, Mesenchymal, MID, HGNET-BCOR) were assigned using an AI-driven classifier trained on Illumina array data (~20,000 CpGs). We evaluated the diagnostic concordance across these three layers. Results: Diagnostic concordance was 100% for IDH -mutant astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas across clinical, WGS, and methylation layers. In contrast, discrepancies emerged in cases clinically diagnosed as glioblastoma. One case was reclassified as pediatric-type diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant . Another tumor in a 13-year-old patient, harboring complex alterations ( ATRX, PTEN, TP53, PIK3R1, PTPRD, CDKN2A ), was assigned non-GBM methylation labels (CONTR/INFLAM), precluding definitive subclassification. Among tumors classified as GBM RTK I (9/10), GBM RTK II (18/18), or Mesenchymal (15/16) by methylation, nearly all fulfilled molecular glioblastoma criteria ( IDH -wildtype, TERTp mutation, EGFR amp, chr7+/10-). Conversely, tumors in the MID and non-GBM methylation classes frequently lacked these canonical features (17/21). Notably, WGS identified a BCOR::EP300 translocation in a sample with an HGNET-BCOR methylation profile-a fusion undetected by routine clinical testing-expanding the spectrum of BCOR -altered CNS tumors beyond canonical internal tandem duplications. Conclusions: Integrated WGS and methylation profiling in this single-center cohort demonstrate that DNA methylation-based classification refines WHO 2021 diagnoses, particularly for tumors routinely diagnosed as glioblastoma. This approach uncovers rare entities, such as pediatric-type gliomas and BCOR -altered tumors, that may be missed by targeted panels alone. Our findings support the implementation of a multi-omics framework to capture biological heterogeneity obscured by limited molecular markers.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Kim, None.. Y. Lee, None. J. Lee, Inocras Inc. Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock Option. T. Roh, None. Y. Ju, Inocras Inc. Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock Option.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索