PO.PR01.03 · 预防研究
用于癌症甲基化生物标志物绝对定量的无参照PCR检测方法
A reference-free PCR assay for absolute quantification of cancer methylation biomarkers
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:DNA m5C甲基化是疾病生物标志物的宝贵资源,在诊断中被广泛应用。然而,目前的qPCR方法依赖于基因或重复元件(如ACTB、ALU-C4)的参照检测进行数据归一化,这可能带来不准确和假阴性。为克服这些局限,我们开发了一种无参照qPCR技术MeRFPCR,该技术无需外部归一化即可对m5C甲基化进行准确的绝对定量。
方法:MeRFPCR利用亚硫酸氢盐处理中由C到T转化产生的非互补的正义和反义DNA链,从而设计出两组引物和荧光探针,分别靶向正义链中的甲基化CpG位点和反义链中相邻的无CpG区域。绝对甲基化水平通过PCR扩增后甲基化信号与无CpG信号的比值进行定量,从而无需外部参照归一化。我们评估了多个基因座的特异性、灵敏度和重复性,并将MeRFPCR与采用外部参照归一化的定量甲基化特异性PCR(qMSP)及亚硫酸氢盐焦磷酸测序进行了对比。该检测方法进一步应用于组织和液体活检样本中癌症甲基化生物标志物的检测。
结果:MeRFPCR在具有挑战性的条件下仍保持稳健性,在低至2 ng的输入量和80至200 bp的片段大小范围内,跨技术重复产生可重现的甲基化百分比(CV <5%)。在来自结直肠癌患者的20对匹配肿瘤及邻近正常组织中,MeRFPCR测得的SEPT9甲基化与焦磷酸测序显示出极佳的一致性(R² = 0.97),并将所有肿瘤与正常组织区分开来。相比之下,qMSP的一致性较低(R² = 0.73),且在若干病例中未能分辨肿瘤-正常组织差异(灵敏度90%)。值得注意的是,与焦磷酸测序相比,MeRFPCR的工作流程更快、更易获取且更具成本效益。此外,MeRFPCR能够从转移性CRC患者少至300 μL的血浆中准确检测甲基化SEPT9的循环游离DNA。这些发现支持了MeRFPCR因无参照方法而带来的技术准确性和优势,凸显了其在受损样本中以及在基于参照的检测受限的实验室环境下的特定诊断潜力。
结论:MeRFPCR技术是一种快速、准确、经济高效且无参照的DNA甲基化绝对定量方法。它有望减少跨平台的批次效应,并改善在具有挑战性的临床样本(包括液体活检和粪便DNA)中的检测。这些发现凸显了MeRFPCR作为一种基础且有价值的工具,在促进癌症甲基化生物标志物无创检测及更广泛的表观遗传学应用方面的潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: DNA m5C methylation is a valuable resource for disease biomarkers widely applied in diagnosis. However, current qPCR methods rely on reference assays of genes or repetitive elements (e.g., ACTB, ALU-C4) for data normalization, which may bring inaccuracy and false negatives. To overcome these limitations, we developed a reference-free qPCR technology, MeRFPCR, that enabled accurate and absolute quantification of m5C methylation without external normalization.
Methods: MeRFPCR utilized uncomplementary sense and antisense DNA strands yielded from C-to-T conversion in bisulfite treatment, allowing the design of two sets of primers and fluorescent probes targeting the methylated CpGs in the sense strand and the adjacent CpG-free region in the antisense strand. An absolute methylation level was quantified as the ratio of the methylated signal to the CpG-free signal following PCR amplification, eliminating the need for external reference normalization. We evaluated specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility across multiple loci, and benchmarked MeRFPCR against quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) with external reference normalization and bisulfite pyrosequencing. The assay was further applied to detect cancer methylation biomarkers in both tissue and liquid biopsy samples.
Results: MeRFPCR preserved robustness under challenging conditions, yielding reproducible methylation percentages across technical replicates (CV <5%) with inputs as low as 2 ng and fragment sizes ranging from 80 to 200 bp. In 20 matched tumor and adjacent normal tissues from colorectal cancer patients, SEPT9 methylation measured by MeRFPCR showed excellent concordance with pyrosequencing (R² = 0.97) and distinguished all tumors from normal tissues. In contrast, qMSP showed lower concordance (R² = 0.73) and failed to resolve tumor-normal differences in several cases (sensitivity 90%). Of note, the workflow of MeRFPCR is faster, easily accessible and more cost-effective compared with pyrosequencing. In addition, MeRFPCR accurately detected methylated SEPT9 in circulating cell-free DNA from as little as 300 µL of plasma in metastatic CRC patients. These findings support the technical accuracy and advantages of MeRFPCR resulting from the reference-free methods, highlighting its specific diagnostic potential in compromised samples and across laboratory settings where reference-based assays are limited.
Conclusion: The MeRFPCR technique is a fast, accurate, cost-effective, and reference-free method for absolute quantification of DNA methylation. It holds promise for reducing batch effects across platforms and improving detection in challenging clinical samples, including liquid biopsy and stool DNA. These findings highlight the potential of MeRFPCR as a basic and valuable tool for facilitating noninvasive detection of cancer methylation biomarkers and broader epigenetic applications.
利益披露 Disclosure
Z. Li, None..
H. Yu, None.