PO.PR01.03 · 预防研究

利用甲基化敏感性限制性内切酶消化和微滴数字PCR对一种新型供者来源参考物质进行甲基化谱分析

Methylation profiling of a novel donor-derived reference material using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion and droplet digital PCR

编号 6339 展板 25 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 36 主讲 Daniel Wasik
分会场 Genomics, Proteomics, Biomarkers, and Risk Stratification
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Daniel Wasik1, Yves Konigshofer2, Mona Shahbazian1, Adam Corner1, Eddy vanCollenburg1, Jayanthi Ramprakash2, Nish Kumar1, Andrew Anfora2, Mai Ho1

1Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA,2LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
异常DNA甲基化以及其他表观遗传修饰是癌症发生发展过程中的重要指标。高甲基化基因所呈现的独特组织特异性模式已与某些癌症类型相关联,并日益被用于识别肿瘤类型和监测疾病进展,包括微小残留病灶(MRD)以及持续的癌症监测。 准确的DNA甲基化分析依赖于稳健的参考标准品来验证检测性能并确保临床相关性。传统上,甲基化标准品是通过将完全甲基化的DNA与非甲基化的DNA按确定比例混合而制备的。虽然这些混合物为定量线性提供了便利的基准,但它们无法捕捉患者样本中所见的复杂甲基化异质性,这可能削弱这些标准品在转化研究和临床诊断中的应用价值。为弥补这一空白,我们的研究评估了一种新型的差异甲基化DNA标准品,该标准品经过专门设计以模拟生理相关的甲基化模式,从而更好地反映真实患者样本中所观察到的复杂性。 在本研究中,甲基化敏感性限制性内切酶(MSRE)与微滴数字PCR(ddPCR)联合使用,建立了一个以高灵敏度和高精密度为特征的DNA甲基化定量分析平台。与亚硫酸氢盐转化相比,MSRE消化所需的起始材料显著更少,并且无需脱嘌呤,从而降低了DNA降解的风险;当与ddPCR配合使用时,它可在单管工作流程中实现简化的、靶标特异性的甲基化检测。 我们在三种参考物质中评估了七个结直肠癌基因位点的甲基化情况:酶法甲基化DNA标准品、非甲基化DNA标准品以及差异甲基化标准品。与制造商所声明的性能一致,酶法甲基化标准品显示出持续的高甲基化,而非甲基化标准品则表现出低背景甲基化。相比之下,差异甲基化参考物质呈现出位点特异性的甲基化异质性,靶标的甲基化程度从非甲基化到部分甲基化不等,且没有一个靶标被发现是完全甲基化的。这些结果表明,Bio-Rad的ddPCR平台能够可靠地检测甲基化异质性,为跨人工合成型和生理相关型对照物质的研究和检测方法开发提供支持。 (仅供研究使用)
查看英文原文 English abstract
Aberrant DNA methylation, along with other epigenetic modifications, are important indicators in the development of cancer. Unique tissue-specific patterns of hyper-methylated genes have been linked to certain cancer types and are increasingly leveraged to identify tumor type and monitor disease progression including minimal residual disease (MRD) and ongoing cancer surveillance. Accurate DNA methylation analysis relies on robust reference standards to validate assay performance and ensure clinical relevance. Traditionally, methylation standards are produced by mixing fully methylated DNA and non-methylated DNA at defined ratios. While these mixtures provide a convenient benchmark for quantitative linearity, they fall short of capturing the complex methylation heterogeneity found in patient samples, which can diminish the utility of these standards for translational research and clinical diagnostics. To address this gap, our study evaluates a novel, differentially methylated DNA standard, specifically engineered to mimic physiologically relevant methylation patterns and better reflect the complexity observed in real-world patient samples. In this study, methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes (MSRE) are utilized in conjunction with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to establish a platform characterized by high sensitivity and precision for the quantitative analysis of DNA methylation. Compared to bisulfite conversion, MSRE digestion requires substantially less input material and eliminates the need for depurination, reducing the risk of DNA degradation; and when paired with ddPCR, it enables a streamlined, target-specific methylation detection in a single-tube workflow. We assessed methylation at seven colorectal cancer gene loci across three reference materials: enzymatically methylated DNA standard, non-methylated DNA standard, and the differentially methylated standard. Consistent with manufacturer's stated performance, the enzymatically methylated standard showed consistently high methylation, while the non-methylated standard exhibited low background methylation. In contrast, the differentially methylated reference material displayed locus-specific methylation heterogeneity, with targets ranging from non-methylated to partially methylated, and none were found to be completely methylated. These results demonstrate that Bio-Rad's ddPCR platform reliably detects methylation heterogeneity, supporting both research and assay development across both contrived and physiologically relevant control materials. (For Research Use Only)
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Wasik, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment. Y. Konigshofer, LGC Clinical Diagnostics Employment. M. Shahbazian, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment. A. Corner, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. E. vanCollenburg, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment. J. Ramprakash, LGC Clinical Diagnostics Employment. N. Kumar, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment. A. Anfora, LGC SeraCare Employment. M. Ho, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索