PO.TB10.07 · 肿瘤生物学
转化型滤泡性淋巴瘤肿瘤微环境的单细胞空间多组学表征
Single cell spatial multi-omic characterization of the tumor microenvironment in transformed follicular lymphoma
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)活检的组织学检查仍然是FL诊断和分期的基石。单细胞测序方法虽然在转录组学上信息丰富,但需要组织解离,因此丢失了可能构成FL进展及向高级别淋巴瘤(通常为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤,DLBCL)转化基础的天然空间背景。通过单细胞空间分析,我们旨在表征从FL向DLBCL组织学转化过程中恶性B细胞与肿瘤微环境(TME)之间的时空异质性和相互作用。
对14例tFL患者的FFPE组织核心(配对FL[tFL-FL]和DLBCL[tFL-DLBCL]时间点)以及13例无进展或转化证据的FL患者(非tFL;随访>6年)进行了单细胞空间转录组学(Nanostring CosMx)和蛋白质组学(Cell DIVE)分析。空间组学证实非tFL和tFL-FL中由恶性B细胞主导的滤泡结构,而在tFL-DLBCL中缺失,这与病理分类一致。随后对滤泡进行了划分(定义了滤泡内、滤泡周围和滤泡外区域),并观察到与滤泡外区域相比,滤泡内区域富集增殖和耗竭特征。此外,观察到不同的空间相互作用模式,其中Galectin-9串扰组分被鉴定为差异表达,且耗竭相关通路在非tFL和tFL-FL时间点的滤泡内和滤泡周围区域更为普遍。巨噬细胞表型也随进展在不同空间区域发生显著变化:非tFL中存在的滤泡内FOLR2⁺和IL4I1⁺巨噬细胞逐渐减少,而CD163⁺、SPP1⁺和NLRP3⁺巨噬细胞在tFL-DLBCL的滤泡外区域日益富集。细胞邻域分析显示非tFL、tFL-FL和tFL-DLBCL时间点之间存在丰度差异。对于B细胞占优势的细胞邻域(CNs),非tFL的生发中心(GC)评分高于tFL-FL,而tFL-FL和tFL-DLBCL共享相似的GC评分水平。在细胞类型组成相似的CNs内,转化状态下T细胞更为耗竭,巨噬细胞更倾向于抗炎表型极化。随后的单细胞蛋白质组学验证了不同空间区域之间滤泡Galectin-9信号传导和巨噬细胞相关基因表达模式的差异。
总之,我们描绘了惰性和转化型FL的空间图谱。我们鉴定了TME组成、空间相互作用和细胞邻域的时空转变。本研究为与FL转化相关的空间淋巴瘤结构提供了新的见解,有助于完善疾病演变模型。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Histological examination of follicular lymphoma (FL) biopsies remains the cornerstone for diagnosis and staging of FL. Single cell sequencing approaches, while transcriptomically rich, require tissue dissociation and therefore lose the native spatial context that may underpin FL progression and transformation to a high-grade lymphoma, typically diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). By single cell spatial profiling, we aimed to characterize the spatiotemporal heterogeneity and interplay between malignant B cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) during transformation from FL to DLBCL histology.
Single cell spatial transcriptomics (Nanostring CosMx) and proteomics (Cell DIVE) were performed on FFPE tissue cores of 14 tFL patients with paired FL (tFL-FL) and DLBCL (tFL-DLBCL) timepoints, and 13 FL patients without evidence of progression or transformation (non-tFL; >6y of follow-up). Spatial omics confirmed malignant B cell dominated follicular structures in non-tFL and tFL-FL while absent in tFL-DLBCL, consistent with pathologic classification. Follicles were then delineated (defining intra-follicular, peri-follicular and extra-follicular regions) and enriched proliferation and exhaustion features were observed in intra-follicular regions compared to extra-follicular counterparts. Moreover, differential spatial interaction patterns were observed, amongst which Galectin-9 crosstalk components were identified as being differentially expressed and exhaustion-related pathways were more prevalent in intra-follicular and peri-follicular regions in non-tFL and tFL-FL timepoints. Macrophage phenotypes also markedly shifted across spatial regions with progression: intrafollicular FOLR2⁺ and IL4I1⁺ macrophages present in non-tFL progressively diminished, while CD163⁺, SPP1⁺, and NLRP3⁺ macrophages became increasingly enriched in extra-follicular regions in tFL-DLBCL. Cell neighborhood analysis showed differential abundance among non-tFL, tFL-FL, and tFL-DLBCL timepoints. For B-cell-predominant cell neighborhoods (CNs), the germinal center (GC) score was higher in non-tFL than tFL-FL, whereas tFL-FL and tFL-DLBCL shared similar GC score levels. Within CNs of similar cell type compositions, T cells were more exhausted and macrophages were more polarized towards anti-inflammatory phenotypes in the transformed state. Subsequent single cell proteomics validated the differential follicular Galectin-9 signaling and macrophage-related gene expression patterns among spatial regions.
In summary, we delineated the spatial landscape of both indolent and transformed FL. We identified a spatiotemporal shift in TME composition, spatial interactions, and cell neighborhoods. This study provides novel insights into the spatial lymphoma architecture associated with FL transformation, contributing to a refined disease evolution model.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Wu, None..
E. Lee, None..
A. Fratzscher, None..
A. Lytle, None..
S. D. Martin, None..
D. G. Huntsman, None..
D. W. Scott, None..
C. Steidl, None..
A. Roth, None.